User talk:Riceissa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:34, 22 March 2017

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice start! Vipul (talk) 07:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Form 1099-MISC page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	eeeeee Vipul (talk) 04:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of senescence research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain View (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a paid editor...

You should not be editing on behalf of your employer, which is effectively what you were doing by reverting my edit to Form 1040. As Vipul, your employer, also requested that article, you have a COI if you're going to team-edit on articles he has requested. Wikipedia is not a how-to, and dispensing tax advice without a disclaimer is not legal per the IRS' guidelines. That article is heading too much in that direction by discussing who can and cannot use which form, and what income classifications are on it. If you wish to dispute the policy, by all means bring it up over there. MSJapan (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to the specific IRS policy that says "dispensing tax advice without a disclaimer is not legal"? I was paid to write the article not to revert your redirection, which I did on my own; can you please explain to me how this would violate Wikipedia's CoI policy? Can you substantiate your claim that I am "team-edit[ing]"? Your actual objection to the article seems to be about specific content within the article not whether the topic is notable. Can you please justify your redirection? Riceissa (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's called Circular 230. Go look it up. It's a COI because you have a relationship with the user who requested the article, as well as anyone who works for that editor. Thus you are team-editing on his behalf. It's being redirected because Wikipedia is not a how-to, and as long as the article is going to describe what goes in what field, what the filing statuses are, and so forth, it is a how-to on how to do taxes.MSJapan (talk) 18:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Your recent editing history at Form 1040 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MSJapan (talk) 22:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits on Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Thanks for your edits on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation article, in particular adding the table with funding. I saw your reply on the talk page; I hope to look into it further in the coming days/weeks (am currently bogged down with other stuff); I think this is very useful information. Thanks a lot! EvMsmile (talk) 00:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Riceissa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing back the "Donald Trump "compromised" claims" article

Just want to thank you for bringing that back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Momomo952 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

hi issaa Ethanbas (talk) 09:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

meoww

meow

meowwww

hii

(n choose 0) - (n choose 1) + (n choose 2) - ... +- (n choose n) = 0 :O how could it be???? nandat/ee

A page you started (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation, Riceissa!

Wikipedia editor Tymon.r just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you! Your page is alright and has been marked as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Tymon.r's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 21:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unlicense article

Thank you good work! :) If your are knowledgable in the license domain, the license compatibility article would require more love.... ;) cheers Shaddim (talk) 10:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC) PS: your page https://issarice.com/wikipedia is quite interesting. Seems we are philosophical on the same page. :) Shaddim (talk) 11:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Vipul's paid editing enterprise. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New thread Corporation timelines opened about SEO link insertion. - Bri (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of digital preservation

The article Timeline of digital preservation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Due to synthesis and original research, article is not salvageable into something suitable for Wikipedia. WP:TNT due to sourcing, WP:PROMO and WP:MEAT issues discussed on this article's talkpage at at WP:COIN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bri.public (talk) 19:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

I have opened a thread on the paid editing enterprise at ANI for community consideration.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jytdog (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Timeline of global health

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Timeline of global health you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Timeline of global health

The article Timeline of global health you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Timeline of global health for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of nonprofit evaluation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of nonprofit evaluation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of nonprofit evaluation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators

User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 02:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (Help!) 11:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above discussion, your editing privileges have been revoked for abusing Wikipedia for promotional purposes. See Template:Unblock and the guide to appealing blocks if you want to appeal. MER-C 08:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Enjoy your indef! Ethanbas ^(talk) 06:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Riceissa (talk) 06:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You got indef'd, Lol. Ethanbas ^(talk) 06:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Ethanbas ^(talk) 06:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Ethanbas ^(talk) 06:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program

User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: I am currently indefinitely blocked, so what does "Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program" mean? Riceissa (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control

User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Comparison of measures of abundance of malaria

User:Riceissa/Comparison of measures of abundance of malaria, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Comparison of measures of abundance of malaria and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Comparison of measures of abundance of malaria during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Delvote

User:Riceissa/Delvote, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Delvote and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Delvote during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Spokes (replication system)

User:Riceissa/Spokes (replication system), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Spokes (replication system) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Spokes (replication system) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Solarized (color scheme)

User:Riceissa/Solarized (color scheme), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Solarized (color scheme) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Solarized (color scheme) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/t test

User:Riceissa/t test, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/t test and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/t test during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/fzf

User:Riceissa/fzf, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/fzf and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/fzf during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Riceissa/Read the Docs

User:Riceissa/Read the Docs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Read the Docs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Riceissa/Read the Docs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 ==MfD nomination of [[:User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program]]==
 [[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 03:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
+:{{ping|DGG}} I am currently indefinitely blocked, so what does "Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal health program" mean? [[User:Riceissa|Riceissa]] ([[User talk:Riceissa#top|talk]]) 03:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 ==MfD nomination of [[:User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control]]==
 [[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:User:Riceissa/Comparison of methods of malaria control]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 03:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)