Jump to content

Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:


How do they put it in rockets then? I find this statement axiomatically incorrect and think it should be removed. [[User:RaRaRasputin|RaRaRasputin]] ([[User talk:RaRaRasputin|talk]]) 21:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
How do they put it in rockets then? I find this statement axiomatically incorrect and think it should be removed. [[User:RaRaRasputin|RaRaRasputin]] ([[User talk:RaRaRasputin|talk]]) 21:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The rockets don't contain explosives. [[Special:Contributions/68.199.221.23|68.199.221.23]] ([[User talk:68.199.221.23|talk]]) 01:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


== Whose territory is it? ==
== Whose territory is it? ==

Revision as of 01:14, 6 April 2017

Template:SCW&ISIL sanctions

Help identify the perpertrator and the gas used

To stay anon, send content to my mail, contact me via talk page. wb_admin (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting government claim of missile factory strike

I don't know how this 1RR crap works for reverting IPs, but one has twice deleted a government claim from the government claims section. If we're just deleting stuff that doesn't fit the fuck Assad theme, that hardly seems fair, but I'm not getting blocked for this. If someone else finds it useful for a wider picture, maybe restore it. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:06, April 4, 2017 (UTC)

And it's back, before I even complained. Thanks. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:09, April 4, 2017 (UTC)
The f'uck, this is the worst source ever, they are paid to lie for the sadist Assad regime--2A02:8108:1900:3E24:C0C7:E9CB:C4BC:595A (talk) 22:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And others are paid to lie against the sadist Assad regime. That's war for you. If readers don't trust the source, they don't have to believe the story. But it seems useful to have someone saying something (somewhat) specific about why the town was hit, where and by what. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:40, April 4, 2017 (UTC)
I see you've deleted a third time, against two editors. I suppose as an IP, our one revert rules are powerless to stop you. Must be nice. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:44, April 4, 2017 (UTC)
1RR only applies to reverting registered users' edits. Revert to your heart's content (well, not quite, but you know). ansh666 00:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetrator

Re[1] Volunteer Marek, what do you mean with "it is known". Do you seriously believe that five days after the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said the United States' policy on Syria is no longer focused on making president, Bashar al-Assad to leave power,ref he go on an order the deadliest chemical attack since the Ghouta attack in 2013? Do you realy think he is that stupid? Come on. Erlbaeko (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blowing up sarin destroys it

How do they put it in rockets then? I find this statement axiomatically incorrect and think it should be removed. RaRaRasputin (talk) 21:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The rockets don't contain explosives. 68.199.221.23 (talk) 01:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whose territory is it?

The infobox mentions the location of the incident as "Ahrar al-Sham-controlled territories". However, the lede itself describes the town as being part of the rival Tahrir al-Sham. The two groups are rivals and have clashed woth each other often. If HTS controls the town, then it doesn't make sense as to why it is called Ahrar al-Sham territory. A source used here says Ahrar al Sham is the main group in the town but it is a Twitter source, if what it says is true then it cannot be said to be "Ahrar al-Sham controlled" as there are other groups controlling parts as well. I wonder if it fulfills WP:SPS. We cannot use it if its unreliable and there are other reliable sources contradicting it. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]