Jump to content

User talk:5 albert square: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Legobot (talk | contribs)
Line 79: Line 79:


The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#rfc_78CA23C|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 76155 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#rfc_78CA23C|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 76155 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

== Dynamic IPs and ClueBot ==

You wrote:
> When vandalism happens, ClueBot does not differentiate whether or not you have a dynamic IP - it won't because it doesn't
> matter.

Yes it does.

When you send one of these messages to a dynamic IP that has been reassigned by an ISP to a different user than the one who committed the vandalism it is a near certainty that it will go to someone who never has and never will edit Wikipedia and has no idea how Wikipedia works: they just know it as a place to look stuff up. It may go to someone who just did their very first edit (but not the one that triggered the warning): you can bet that they will never do another. They will find your messages accusing them of vandalism very offputting and perhaps even a little frightening (they may conclude that Wikipedia is "tracking" them). There are automated ways to identify dynamic IPs with some reliability. If you insist on continuing to send these automated warnings to IPs please arrange for the messages to go only to IPs that you have good reason to believe are static.
[[Special:Contributions/72.160.224.122|72.160.224.122]] ([[User talk:72.160.224.122|talk]]) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:28, 27 October 2017


It is approximately 2:46 PM where this user lives (Newcastle upon Tyne). [refresh]


Admins: If I have erred in one of my admin actions, or my rationale for the action no longer applies, please don't hesitate to reverse it. I have no objection to my actions being reversed, as long you leave me a polite note explaining what you did and why. Thanks.



Please place awards on my awards page.



Today is Thursday, 25 July 2024, and the current time is 13:46 (UTC/GMT). There are currently 6,856,920 articles.
Purge this page for a new update.



Hi everyone

Welcome to my talk page!

If you post a message here then please add this page to your watchlist as I will reply here. If I ask you a question on your talk page then please reply on your talk page as I will be watching it.

Finally please remember to sign your signature using the button.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic IPs and ClueBot

You wrote: > When vandalism happens, ClueBot does not differentiate whether or not you have a dynamic IP - it won't because it doesn't > matter.

Yes it does.

When you send one of these messages to a dynamic IP that has been reassigned by an ISP to a different user than the one who committed the vandalism it is a near certainty that it will go to someone who never has and never will edit Wikipedia and has no idea how Wikipedia works: they just know it as a place to look stuff up. It may go to someone who just did their very first edit (but not the one that triggered the warning): you can bet that they will never do another. They will find your messages accusing them of vandalism very offputting and perhaps even a little frightening (they may conclude that Wikipedia is "tracking" them). There are automated ways to identify dynamic IPs with some reliability. If you insist on continuing to send these automated warnings to IPs please arrange for the messages to go only to IPs that you have good reason to believe are static. 72.160.224.122 (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]