User talk:5 albert square: Difference between revisions
→Dynamic IPs and ClueBot: new section |
|||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#rfc_78CA23C|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 76155 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC) |
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#rfc_78CA23C|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 76155 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Dynamic IPs and ClueBot == |
|||
You wrote: |
|||
> When vandalism happens, ClueBot does not differentiate whether or not you have a dynamic IP - it won't because it doesn't |
|||
> matter. |
|||
Yes it does. |
|||
When you send one of these messages to a dynamic IP that has been reassigned by an ISP to a different user than the one who committed the vandalism it is a near certainty that it will go to someone who never has and never will edit Wikipedia and has no idea how Wikipedia works: they just know it as a place to look stuff up. It may go to someone who just did their very first edit (but not the one that triggered the warning): you can bet that they will never do another. They will find your messages accusing them of vandalism very offputting and perhaps even a little frightening (they may conclude that Wikipedia is "tracking" them). There are automated ways to identify dynamic IPs with some reliability. If you insist on continuing to send these automated warnings to IPs please arrange for the messages to go only to IPs that you have good reason to believe are static. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/72.160.224.122|72.160.224.122]] ([[User talk:72.160.224.122|talk]]) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:28, 27 October 2017
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
![]() |
It is approximately 2:46 PM where this user lives (Newcastle upon Tyne). [ ] |
Today is Thursday, 25 July 2024, and the current time is 13:46 (UTC/GMT). There are currently 6,856,920 articles. this page for a new update. |
Hi everyone
Welcome to my talk page!
![]() | Read first! Welcome to my talk page! Questions, information, warnings? Say it here! Please post new topic at the bottom of this page, please sign your topic with ~~~~. And remember, Assume good faith! Click here to start a new topic. |
If you post a message here then please add this page to your watchlist as I will reply here. If I ask you a question on your talk page then please reply on your talk page as I will be watching it.
Finally please remember to sign your signature using the button.
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
You can use
ccnorm_contains_any
when you create an abuse filter. This can be used to look for multiple words or phrases within a string. It will find words where some characters have been replaced. You can read more in the documentation. [1]
Changes later this week
- When you search in some languages the search function could use specific other languages if the first language didn't work. This is called a fallback language. This didn't work properly and created bad searches. The search index is being fixed to work better. [2]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 October. It will be on all wikis from 26 October (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 24 October at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 25 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- There is a Structured Commons community focus group for Commons and Wikidata contributors who want to give input on structured data on Wikimedia Commons. You can sign up to join it. [3]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Dynamic IPs and ClueBot
You wrote: > When vandalism happens, ClueBot does not differentiate whether or not you have a dynamic IP - it won't because it doesn't > matter.
Yes it does.
When you send one of these messages to a dynamic IP that has been reassigned by an ISP to a different user than the one who committed the vandalism it is a near certainty that it will go to someone who never has and never will edit Wikipedia and has no idea how Wikipedia works: they just know it as a place to look stuff up. It may go to someone who just did their very first edit (but not the one that triggered the warning): you can bet that they will never do another. They will find your messages accusing them of vandalism very offputting and perhaps even a little frightening (they may conclude that Wikipedia is "tracking" them). There are automated ways to identify dynamic IPs with some reliability. If you insist on continuing to send these automated warnings to IPs please arrange for the messages to go only to IPs that you have good reason to believe are static. 72.160.224.122 (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)