Jump to content

User talk:5 albert square/Archive46

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edits on Donald Trump

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit on Donald Trump. I'm not sure why you made this edit, as you removed a link to the Justice's Department's PDF of the Russian Interference Investigation (which was part of a reference) and you also incorrectly changed the titles of multiple news articles, making some letters lowercase when, according to the source themselves, they are capitalized. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

  • @Politicsfan4:The url to the Justice Dept's document has been restored. It was probably removed by the formatting script as linkspam, but the {{efn}} has now been protected so the links within will not be removed. As to the formatting changes to the article titles, titles should abide to our WP:MOS. Downcasing of titles that are incorrectly in upper case is appropriate even though sources may apply their own MOS to these. Indeed there's no question that prepositions in works titles cannot be downcased. -- Ohc ¡digame! 09:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit on Joe Biden

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Your edit has deleted two images from the Joe Biden article and I do not have the privileges to restore them. Omnibus (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, it's been changed.-- 5 albert square (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ian and Sharon's marriage

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi thank you for reverting the marriage duration I have already reverted it once and now I've just had to change it on Ian once again. Adavid299 (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

No problems, I was about to thank you for doing the same thing :) I added the hidden comment beforehand as this usually happens. I'll keep an eye on both the articles plus The Queen Vic in case it gets added as an event.-- 5 albert square (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

22:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

EastEnders sockpuppetry

Hello – could you please place semi-protection for the 2014 (and potentially 2019) character lists? 2014 is always hit by an IP sock, and 2019 is more often than not changed too. I don't know of any SPIs for this Gavin Ellis sock but protection would help. DarkGlow (contribstalk) 19:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done I don't think there is any. Sometimes it's best to just revert, block and ignore-- 5 albert square (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks. Got it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Porn vandals and LTAs

Re [17], please, please just block these people on sight! They know what they are doing is wrong. MusikAnimal and zzuuzz know about this. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

SaltySaltyTears

SaltySaltyTears is requesting unblock on UTRS. AmandaNP has said to extend them rope. Please let me know your thoughts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, 5. Thanks for the information you sent me a couple of days ago. For reasons I can't be bothered to explain, I have only just seen it, but as you will see I've taken it on board and acted accordingly. JBW (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021


19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Classification

Hi how come we are changing past back to Former? Adavid299 (talk) 20:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, there was a discussion on the talk page of the template here and it was decided to use former 5 albert square (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

23:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)