Jump to content

Talk:AV1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Flugaal (talk | contribs)
→‎lists: new section
Line 25: Line 25:


Shouldn't we describe important features and the process how features are added in prose instead of bloating the article with those questionable excessive lists? I find such lists to add little value and regard them mostly as a sign for low quality articles.--[[User:Flugaal|Flugaal]] ([[User talk:Flugaal|talk]]) 20:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Shouldn't we describe important features and the process how features are added in prose instead of bloating the article with those questionable excessive lists? I find such lists to add little value and regard them mostly as a sign for low quality articles.--[[User:Flugaal|Flugaal]] ([[User talk:Flugaal|talk]]) 20:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

: For current experiments, let's drop those lacking explanations – that's no sacrifice at all. Actually, it doesn't matter, since that list is supposed to be empty in a month's time. Meanwhile, the list of former experiments will gain at most 5 more (J.Krishnan, STSWE 2017) before it's final. That list, in ''list form'', is golden: All sources we have about the features of the format so far are sparse or outdated, while this list, to the best of our knowledge, is complete! If/when an official or better list or overview of any sort is revealed, we should of course link to that instead.—[[Special:Contributions/84.208.177.88|84.208.177.88]] ([[User talk:84.208.177.88|talk]]) 22:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:10, 26 December 2017

Lossless?

Does this codec support lossless RGB encoding/decoding? That seems like it would be useful information to have in this article. I came here looking for that information, but it was missing. -AlexFolland (talk) 11:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I second that request. I've been reading up on all kinds of sources but could find no information regarding support for a lossless mode.2A02:8109:8700:11A0:8DD1:24F3:1D5D:BEB3 (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If I read the specs correctly, it does: https://webmproject.github.io/av1-bitstream/ 83.87.131.205 (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it does, see Changelog v1.3.0 too: https://github.com/mbebenita/aom/blob/master/CHANGELOG Slhck (talk) 12:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the logo supposed to be an A+1+v for Av1? Anyway, please add an infobox here. –193.96.224.9 (talk) 12:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lists

Shouldn't we describe important features and the process how features are added in prose instead of bloating the article with those questionable excessive lists? I find such lists to add little value and regard them mostly as a sign for low quality articles.--Flugaal (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For current experiments, let's drop those lacking explanations – that's no sacrifice at all. Actually, it doesn't matter, since that list is supposed to be empty in a month's time. Meanwhile, the list of former experiments will gain at most 5 more (J.Krishnan, STSWE 2017) before it's final. That list, in list form, is golden: All sources we have about the features of the format so far are sparse or outdated, while this list, to the best of our knowledge, is complete! If/when an official or better list or overview of any sort is revealed, we should of course link to that instead.—84.208.177.88 (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]