Jump to content

Talk:Falooda: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5.4)
Line 45: Line 45:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 00:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 00:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

== removal of RS by some persian users and reverting removal of a non RS persian blog post. ==

i have posted RS, which has been declared ''POV'' by persian users such as {{ping|Wikaviani}} {{ping|LouisAragon}} while the removal of a non RS, persian blog post has been reinstated. i want to call these users to discuss why they have done that. [[Special:Contributions/175.137.72.188|175.137.72.188]] ([[User talk:175.137.72.188|talk]]) 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:42, 13 February 2019

Untitled

I was more interested to know in which country the Falooda originated in. I thought that it had originated in Persia now called Iran ...

Untitled

Is it really necessary to quote someone as describing Falooda as "The worst fucking thing"?

I agree. It may be the worst f@cking thing in the world, but it's unnecessary to include this unreferenced quote. Applejuicefool 16:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I oppose the proposed merge because, while they have similar names and are historically related, they are not the same. Faloodeh, the Persian dessert, is not a drink, for a start. Munci (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. They're completely different. Many Indian dishes originated in Persia but have evolved through time. South Asian persian inspired food is not a subset of Iranian cookery. Pidog99 (talk) 08:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an error in this article. Falooda is essentially not a drink in India or Pakistan either. There is a drink that incorporates falooda which seems to be called falooda also. I don't think it's available in North India or Pakistan. Seems to be an innovation from Bombay that's spread into some regions. However, there are other reasons to keep the articles distinct. As far as I know, the Falooda-qulfi combination, the usage of falooda in idiomatic language, etc are all specific to the subcontinent. It has a distinct history. Most Indians and Pakistanis have no idea that falooda is of Persian origin, anymore than the Irish think of the potato as a South American thing - it is considered totally native to the subcontinent. --Hunnjazal (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have arranged both articles so that no merger is needed. Xufanc (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, no merge. However I do think it is good to include the history and relationship between the two to show the difference. Jooojay (talk) 06:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noodles

Currently this article says the noodles can be made of wheat starch and it has a citation with a dead link for this information. I have never seen wheat-based noodles used since they have gluten and get soggy. Can someone find a more reliable citation for this? Or can we remove it, if not? I have looked and I am not finding it. Jooojay (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Falooda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

removal of RS by some persian users and reverting removal of a non RS persian blog post.

i have posted RS, which has been declared POV by persian users such as @Wikaviani: @LouisAragon: while the removal of a non RS, persian blog post has been reinstated. i want to call these users to discuss why they have done that. 175.137.72.188 (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]