Talk:Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
==Untitled==
==Untitled==
I'm not sure I'd rate this article as "B" class. There is absolutely no discussion about the historical reliability of the sources on this person, not even a mention that this period in Roman History is often considered more legend than fact. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 21:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure I'd rate this article as "B" class. There is absolutely no discussion about the historical reliability of the sources on this person, not even a mention that this period in Roman History is often considered more legend than fact. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 21:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


The sources used in this article are the most reliable sources available about this time period. Would you rather there was just no page on this guy? [[User:CrypticIndividual1000|CrypticIndividual1000]] ([[User talk:CrypticIndividual1000|talk]]) 18:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:43, 22 March 2019

Untitled

I'm not sure I'd rate this article as "B" class. There is absolutely no discussion about the historical reliability of the sources on this person, not even a mention that this period in Roman History is often considered more legend than fact. -- llywrch (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The sources used in this article are the most reliable sources available about this time period. Would you rather there was just no page on this guy? CrypticIndividual1000 (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]