Talk:CORE (research service): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:44, 5 June 2019

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Open Access Start‑class Mid‑importance

CORE (research service) is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Nancy Pontika, the main author of this entry, is an Open Access Aggregation Officer at the CORE project.

Requested move 29 May 2019

It has been proposed in this section that CORE (research service) be renamed and moved to CORE.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

COnnecting REpositories → CORE – The project has stopped using the acronym COnnecting REpositories since ~2017. Thus we would like to change the page title to its current name, CORE. After that we will also update the content of the page, as it is outdated. I work for CORE. Nancypontika (talk) 17:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a malformed request. The proposed destination name is already occupied by something different, and the nominator has not suggested what to do about that. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to CORE (library organization)? Is that a better title? Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "CORE (open access project)" or "CORE (open access aggregation system)"? I don't think it fits the description of "library organization". —BarrelProof (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks a lot for starting this discussion and my apologies for the malformed request. Is it possible that we (CORE) provide some alternative suggestions? And if yes, could we have a week to think about it, provided that it is not already taken? Thanks a lot. --2A02:C7D:8210:4F00:60DE:67C3:17D5:24BE (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *Move to [[CORE (library organization)]]? Is that a better title? [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 20:59, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 **How about "{{no redirect|CORE (open access project)}}" or "{{no redirect|CORE (open access aggregation system)}}"? I don't think it fits the description of "library organization". —[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 17:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
+** Thanks a lot for starting this discussion and my apologies for the malformed request. Is it possible that we (CORE) provide some alternative suggestions? And if yes, could we have a week to think about it, provided that it is not already taken? Thanks a lot. --[[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:8210:4F00:60DE:67C3:17D5:24BE|2A02:C7D:8210:4F00:60DE:67C3:17D5:24BE]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7D:8210:4F00:60DE:67C3:17D5:24BE|talk]]) 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)