User talk:MalachiReschke: Difference between revisions
→DYK nomination: june 9th |
|||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
::: {{ping|Valereee}} I'm not sure how this will affect the process, but I created the article on May 26th, which would put it outside the one-week requirement. Is this an issue? Thanks again for guiding me through the process. --[[User:MalachiReschke|MalachiReschke]] ([[User talk:MalachiReschke#top|talk]]) 19:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
::: {{ping|Valereee}} I'm not sure how this will affect the process, but I created the article on May 26th, which would put it outside the one-week requirement. Is this an issue? Thanks again for guiding me through the process. --[[User:MalachiReschke|MalachiReschke]] ([[User talk:MalachiReschke#top|talk]]) 19:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::Nope, the date starts counting from when the article was moved from draft space, which was yesterday. When you post it to the noms page, place it under June 9th. --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 20:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
::::Nope, the date starts counting from when the article was moved from draft space, which was yesterday. When you post it to the noms page, place it under June 9th. --[[User:Valereee|valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 20:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::: {{ping|Valereee}} Alright, I think I did it correctly and have submitted the edit. I know I keep saying this but thank you for the time and effort you've put into helping me; you've made my first editing experience great and I'm looking forward to many more. Again, thank you so much! --[[User:MalachiReschke|MalachiReschke]] ([[User talk:MalachiReschke#top|talk]]) 20:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:16, 10 June 2019
Welcome
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi MalachiReschke! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: 1963 Freedom Ballot has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)DYK nomination
Hi, MalachiReschke! I think you could nominate this article for "Did you know...", which puts a link to it on the Main Page for 24 hours. If you're interested, I can walk you through the process. --valereee (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Valereee: That would be great! As soon as I insert a categories box, I'd love to have you go over that with me. Thank you! Nevermind, you seem to have covered the categorization already. Thanks again! --MalachiReschke (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Great! The form to nominate is here. There's a learning curve, but I'm happy to help. Before you start, you need to think of a "hook," which is some short fact from the article that would be likely to make a random reader think, "Huh, that's interesting" and want to click through the read the article. You could do something like "... that nearly 80,000 black Mississippians cast a vote in the 1963 Freedom Ballot, four times the number who were registered to vote?", for example. You want to provide a link to a source/sources that very clearly supports all points in the hook; for that example I'd use the ibiblio sncc source. You want to provide the exact quote within that source that supports your hook; for that example I'd use "Nearly 80,000 blacks came out to vote, four times the number of blacks registered to vote in the state."
- There are instructions at the nomination form, plus links for details and clarifications, etc. Ping me with any questions; my editing hours are primarily 5am - 5pm Eastern, so if you start the process at that time of day I'm likely to be available within a couple hours at most. In the meantime I'll go do a DYK check on the article to make sure all our ducks are in a row. --valereee (talk) 12:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Valereee: Hello again. I just wanted to know if you would like to be included as an author since you contributed so much to the article. --MalachiReschke (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- That's so kind! No, this is your article! You create and nominate! It's a very big deal for a brand new editor to write an article from scratch. --valereee (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Valereee: I'm not sure how this will affect the process, but I created the article on May 26th, which would put it outside the one-week requirement. Is this an issue? Thanks again for guiding me through the process. --MalachiReschke (talk) 19:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nope, the date starts counting from when the article was moved from draft space, which was yesterday. When you post it to the noms page, place it under June 9th. --valereee (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Valereee: Alright, I think I did it correctly and have submitted the edit. I know I keep saying this but thank you for the time and effort you've put into helping me; you've made my first editing experience great and I'm looking forward to many more. Again, thank you so much! --MalachiReschke (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nope, the date starts counting from when the article was moved from draft space, which was yesterday. When you post it to the noms page, place it under June 9th. --valereee (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Valereee: Hello again. I just wanted to know if you would like to be included as an author since you contributed so much to the article. --MalachiReschke (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)