Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 251: Line 251:


:: {{u|77.140.58.203}} I am so sorry. The message was not meant for you but other editor which I place my cursor on the wrong line and sent the message. I have removed the message from your talk page and thank you for corrected the text on Kabib page. Once again, thank you for informing me and my apologies. Thank you.[[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
:: {{u|77.140.58.203}} I am so sorry. The message was not meant for you but other editor which I place my cursor on the wrong line and sent the message. I have removed the message from your talk page and thank you for corrected the text on Kabib page. Once again, thank you for informing me and my apologies. Thank you.[[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

== account and article ==

Would like to ask if my account can't lose its privelages. I'm aware I have had multiple accounts in the past, primarily because I forget my passwords and sometimes find Wikipedia confusing.

Also, I really ask that my article [[Draft:Free Republic of Verdis]] is approved. It was previously declined due to lack of references, although it now has references. JHaworth recently unblocked it and I am now trying to get it to be accepted. It is not a hoax. I am a founding member of Verdis and am just trying to get it on wikipedia, primarily for a knowledge panel on Google along with it generally being on Wikipedia like Liberland, which we have very similar beliefs and efforts to.

Revision as of 09:45, 12 June 2019


Your very own Wikipedia bookmark page

With its own link at the top of every page, your user page is as accessible as Wikipedia's Main Page. Because of this, it is your customizable Wikipedia navigation hub. Just place your favorite Wikipedia and external reference links on your user page, and you can access them instantly anytime you want from anywhere on Wikipedia.

For more ideas on how to customize your user page, see Wikipedia's User Page Design Center. There's also a help department there too.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}


Review My Article

Dear CASSIOPEIA

I have followed what the administrator that moved my article to Draft said together with the advice of all the senior Wikipedians that I have discussed with. I have removed my unreliable sources and added 2 news reliable sources. The news sources are from a local news website. The two sources have almost the same title but different information provided. Please do review my article as writing articles for everyone is my passion. I learn as I go and I love taking in advice. I have taken in alot and hope this is the time for the confirmation to include my article into Wikipedia.

Artciel for reviewing: Draft:J. Philip Vincent

Thank you very much CASSIOPIA

Mathewanderson7232 (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Mathew Anderson (talk)[reply]

Mathewanderson7232 Greetings. if you look at the history page of the article on "02:16, May 22, 2019‎ Noq talk contribs‎ m  4,589 bytes 0‎  Noq moved page J. Philip Vincent to Draft:J. Philip Vincent without leaving a redirect: Undersourced, incubate in draftspace. Honours section is unsourced, references with just passing mentions of him are not WP:significant coverage, Politician needs expanding - what role does a vice chairman play in the party?" - this is the reason why the page was moved back to draft space. The two sources you added didnot mentioned about the 'Honours of Malaysia" as per article claimed. Do note, sources can be in any languages. Since the subject is an Indian politician party vice president, and if you know India language, you might able to find some Indian newspaper sources of the subject. I tried to look for the subject in English and not able to locate more sources than what you have added. You could also find book sources. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear CASSIOPEIA
this was my mistake. I have removed the 'Honours of Malaysia' and just left the Penang honours as those honours were only sourced. And just for your information, in Malaysia, the place i currently live, honours are not given individually there accumulate everyone and give all honours one shot. For example 10 people are receiving the honour so the governor or Penang will award all at once and the news companies will publish all of the 10 people in one article as they don't stress on each individual. I am a writer of The Star Newspaper and The Star Online which is how I quickly manage to get the sources on your command. However, I did remove what I was told to remove. And also I need to inform you that this man I am writing about has resigned as a politician long ago. He is now a businessperson. So at that time, not good media or sourcing companies actually published this which is why I have trouble finding sources. In today's world, he is a businessperson. So please understand that I have limited sources of him as a politician since 2009 which is why I stated only a few details which could be refered back to. I really need your help CASSIOPEIA to give me the green light.
Thank you very much and I hope you understand and approve my article. Once my article gets approved, I wont stop finding for sources and keep adding them to my article as requested by Noq.
Mathewanderson7232 (talk) 05:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Mathew Anderson (talk):[reply]
Mathewanderson7232 First of all, if you are a WP:PAID editor (paid to write this page) then you need to WP:DISCLOSURE your conflict of interest on the (1) article talk page and (2) your user page. Pls see [[WP:DISCLOSURE] for info and instruction (make sure you do that) as Wikipedia strongly discourage editor with COI to edited on affected page. Secondly, if you currently live in Malaysia and is a journalist in a major newspaper and cant find any sources to further support the requirements needed then, it would be hard for anyone to assist. Have you try book that talk about him in part? Check on print material in the library, if the article is about him even he is a business man now, along as it mentioned the content in the article, you can use it as reference. Even if the honour he received is in group, and the sources indicate his name and the "name of the honour" he received that is good enough to use that source. As a vice president of a polical party even in State level is no small roles, there should be sources out there that talk about him or he have made some news on his political activities. I have approved and other review viewed more sources should be given. Since at the moment there is no changes for such it would not be a good practice for me to approve the same state again and I will leave it to other reviewers to do what they see fit. once The draft will stay in Wikipedia for 6 months before it is deleted. So try to find the sources. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear CASSIOPEIA
I will follow your instructions as you adviced. I will look for as many sources as possible. By the way, I do have some books that have great content about him but is not registered with an ISBN but can be found at libraries. Can I still use that as a reference? Because if its a yes then I have a lot to write.
Thank you very much.Mathewanderson7232 (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mathewanderson7232 Add book sources as what you could find. Anyway try Google books (do provide chapter and page number on reference). Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear CASSIOPEIA
I have added new references and some non-english references like you asked. I also added some books and magazines that can be refered back to including some new newspaper articles. Please do review my article.
Draft:J. Philip Vincent
Thank you very much. Regards from me.
Mathewanderson7232 (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Mathewanderson7232 Hi Greetings. I would leave it to other reviewer to review your draft page as I have done once. Do note we have about 3.5 to 4k draft articles in the pool waiting to be reviewed and the backlog is about 5/6 weeks. So please be patient. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019-20 Minnesota Timberwolves season

I Found another reliable source from twincities.com that is a newspaper online. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 Greetings. The draft need at least 3 sources. Here are some if you could use/ them for the content of the draft page.
  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
Do register to Wikipedia for there are more features which would be benificial to you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cassiopeia,

               I have read your message regarding my new page of "The Cause For Joseph Immaculate" and I now have the information needed for you to get in touch with the writers of the article on "Justification". The email address is:truth@compellingturth.org Could you please get in touch with them straight away so that my page is not deleted. I would really appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Please message me to let me know that you have seen my message here. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours Sincerely. June Brown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FJBrown (talkcontribs) 14:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FJBrown Greetings. You draft page has been deleted due to copyright infringement which means you have copied and paste the content from "complelingturth.org", a copyrighted site, to the draft page. You need to write the article in your own word and in neutral point of view. Secondly, "complelingturth.org" can be cant be reliable source as it states on their web site "Presenting the truth of the Christian faith in a compelling, relevant, and practical way. Our mission is to take the questions, issues, struggles, and disagreements that exist within the Christian faith and shine the truth of God's Word on them. We believe the truth of God's Word is compelling." Pls look for books sources. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Can be" or "cannot be"? Doug Weller talk 12:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller good day. Thank you for spotted that. I mean cant be and missing out the "t". Thank you for letting me know. Mistake is all mine. Appreciate it. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know this was obvious copyvio and I've deleted it. Doug Weller talk 12:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller Hi, Did I review this page as I cant see since it is deleted - [5]. Pls advise if I did and the "date I reviewed it". Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, there were two articles,I copied the wrong one into the section heading, many apologies. Draft:Inside Out Emotional Whirlwind You moved it from article space to draft space. 13:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talkcontribs)
Doug Weller Ok and thank you for letting me know. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


How do you do, Cassiopeia? There is something unusual happening. In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-391, it appears to me that some fans of the musician are coming along to vote keep in the discussion. It is slightly concerning because this technique prevents the deletion process from moving smoothly. I have a feeling those people were instructed by the musician himself to show up and voice out against deleting the page. Do you know how to deal with this? I am asking you because I do not know anyone else on here. KoopaLoopa (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KoopaLoopa Greetings. The IP user had only one edit and it was made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-391. The IP editor might be a Sock puppeteer or WP:MEATPUPPET or just a random registered editor who did not log in while making the edit - we would not know. If you want an investigation, then to to WP:SPI and click on "How to open an investigation:". Place the master puppet name (that is the one you have to figure out which editor), and list the stock. Provide "history diff" and clear explanation of the case. If you do not have good evident, then pls do not file it - Wikipedia:Don't be quick to assume that someone is a sockpuppet Pls read through all the links I provided above prior any action is taken. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know to proceed with WP:SPI. Will you please assist me with that? I don't have any information on those people but I think it's no coincidence they came there to vote keep by themselves. Also the creator of that article was blocked for undisclosed paid editing, so could it be them who is the mastermind? KoopaLoopa (talk) 19:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
KoopaLoopa, hi, I have explained to you on my previous message on how to file the report and you would read more about it at WP:SPI - see THIS example.Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CASSIOPEIA

Per WP:MMAORG, Krantz has had three fights in top-tier promotions. His two bouts in Bellator MMA took place during the period where the promotion was labeled as top tier from 2009 to 2015, with both bouts occurring in 2012. I would ask you to please reverse your edits on his wiki page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Luchuslu (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi Luchuslu Greetings. I didnt notice his two Bellator bouts and I apologies for redirect the page. I have removed the redirect and added all the wikilinks to the associated pages. You could find the article in the mainspace here - Derrick Krantz. Once again, my apologies and the mistake was soley mine. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:31, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Luchuslu (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Luchuslu, Thank you for your understanding and once again my apologies. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Strathnairn

Strathnairn (Canberra)

Hi, thank you for accepting the article Strathnairn (Canberra). Is it possible to please move this article to the title "Strathnairn, Australian Capital Territory" as per system of naming for Canberra suburbs. I had input the article title as the name of the article, however, only titled the draft "Strathnairn". I can update the hyperlinks to the new title. I do not have the ability to move the article from my username. Gebruikersnaam55 (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gebruikersnaam55 Greeting. Moved to Strathnairn, Australian Capital Territory as requested. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:29, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw your update. Thank you. Gebruikersnaam55 (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gebruikersnaam55 You are welcome and thank you for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cassiopeia and thank you for your interaction, I'am creating articles that covers women's sports and sport statistics, I know some articles might have a simple contents and are very simple, this is due to my English level, But Articles must be created first and therefor developed over time, I have added all citations and sources to the last article you have noted, Hopefully, your removed from the draft list. thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobantini (talkcontribs) 18:21, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

Gobantini Greeting. You have added sources but they are primary which can not be contributed to the notability of the draft article. You need to provide independent, reliable sources which states specifically about the number (wins) of "women's club international titles in volleyball". Sources from newspaper would be good and stand alone list article do allow to have group sources. Lastly, pls do not remove the submission template on the top of the article, when you have provide the appropriate source then hit the submit button for review. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:29, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created Pages Moved To Edit

You recently moved 3 pages 2019-0 FA Cup qualifying rounds, 2019-20 FA Trophy and 2019-20 FA Vase I created to Edit as they had no references, I've since added a reference to each page as they've since been made available but someone else won't take the pages out of Edit mode, any help?

BTW, one of the pages I mentioned above, had one for last season 2018-19 FA Trophy and that had no references from it's creation to its finish and that was never moved to edit. "Smithy53 (talk) 13:31, 11 June 2019 (UTC)"[reply]

Smithy53 Good day. I believe you were referred to Draft:2019–20 FA Cup qualifying rounds, 2018–19 FA Cup and Draft:2019–20 FA Trophy. I noticed you have added one reference (source) to each of the draft article; however they are not the right source as the are consider WP:PRIMARY source which are considered not independent. We need at least at least 3 [[WP:IS|independent], reliable sources for verification where by the sources talk about the subject directly and not merely passing mentioned. Sources such as from major newspapers are good source and sources can be in any languages. Sources from official web site, home page, marketing, press releases, user generated sources, interviews, and etc are considered not independent and / or not reliable and ca not be used to contribute /demonstrate the notability of the subject. Once you have added 3 sources for each article then let me know. Pls see WP:GOLDENRULE.
We have a limited of reviewers and some of new as such some articles acceptable and also see WP:OSE. However, to say that, even if the article is accepted and irregardless how many years it has been in Wikipedia mainspace and it could be nominated for deletion if any editor find the it does not meet the notability guidelines. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck in someone being able to find 3 sources each for those pages even before the season has started, not sure where you are but those 3 pages are regarding English non-league football cups and the draws are mainly only announced on www.TheFA.com's website (the FA is the governing body of English football), so it will be difficult in finding 3 independant sources.
And if I'd have known that "even if the article is accepted and irregardless how many years it has been in Wikipedia mainspace and it could be nominated for deletion if any editor find the it does not meet the notability guidelines." I wouldn't wasted my time in updating each FA Cup qualifying, FA Trophy and FA Vase pages over the last 3 years for the chance it could be deleted. "Smithy53 (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Smithy53 Please when not an editor nominate an article for deletion, does not mean the article will be deleted automatically. It needs to go to article for deletion discussion, and if other editors find the article is notable based on Wikipedia notability requirements, then the article will stay in Wikipedia, in short, only article truly meet Wikipedia notability requirements will stay in Wikipedia mainspace for good. Since there are not independent sources to be available at this stage of your draft articles to support the content claim it means, it is WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTALL at the moment. If you have not read the WP:GOLDENRULE link which I provided on my previous message, I suggest you to read so you may understand the requirements needed. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CASSIOPEIA I find it strange that you won't just accept a source from one of the governing bodies of English football (The FA) as a reliable one and would prefer one from somone who is independant and less trustworthy. For the last 3 years since I've been updating these 3 pages it has never been a problem and I find one or two of people who moderate on Wiki petty, so if it's all the same from now on I'll let others fill in these 3 pages, good luck with that as getting all the attendances is difficult if you don't know where to look. "Smithy53 (talk) 05:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Smithy53 A source can be reliable but not independent (such as FA is associate with the clubs). We need both independent (from the subject) and reliable (well reputable sources) such as independent reliable media (such as major newspaper) talk about the subject. I have provided you the links and do suggest you to read to understand further. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #368

The message you sent me

Hello,

I don't appreciate the message you just sent me about the changes made to Khabib Nurmagomedov's page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khabib_Nurmagomedov

I went to check the page a few hours ago and noticed that some troll made inappropriate/racists changes to his page (mainly the "Rat" comment), so I went to correct two of them, and now you accuse me of vandalism? I assume you got confused and thought I was the one that made the bad edits. If so, then no harm done but double check the edits before falsely accusing people trying to correct mistakes and bigoted comments.

Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.140.58.203 (talk) 03:04, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

77.140.58.203 I am so sorry. The message was not meant for you but other editor which I place my cursor on the wrong line and sent the message. I have removed the message from your talk page and thank you for corrected the text on Kabib page. Once again, thank you for informing me and my apologies. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

account and article

Would like to ask if my account can't lose its privelages. I'm aware I have had multiple accounts in the past, primarily because I forget my passwords and sometimes find Wikipedia confusing.

Also, I really ask that my article Draft:Free Republic of Verdis is approved. It was previously declined due to lack of references, although it now has references. JHaworth recently unblocked it and I am now trying to get it to be accepted. It is not a hoax. I am a founding member of Verdis and am just trying to get it on wikipedia, primarily for a knowledge panel on Google along with it generally being on Wikipedia like Liberland, which we have very similar beliefs and efforts to.