User talk:Smithy53

Welcome!

Hello, Smithy53, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS - if you're interested in contributing to football related articles, then have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football where there's suggestions for articles needed or needing improvement! --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2016–17 FA Vase page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your outstanding work on the 2017-18 FA Cup qualifying rounds page - it does not go unnoticed! M00036 (talk) 12:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Smithy53. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Armand Gnanduillet, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raul Correia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sidmouth Town A.F.C.

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Smithy53, thanks for creating Sidmouth Town A.F.C.!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Glenn Hoddle. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got the information from Carl Hoddle's Wiki page and that wasn't unsourced, I suggest you delete that as well.

I seem to remember you did the same with Danny Philliskirk when I updated his Senior Career details by adding AFC Fylde, this is still missing from his page today, he actually scored again for them today.

If you're not happy them block me, I'm sure I won't lose any sleep.

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosie Jones (model), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Smithy53. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool FC Responce

Hello. I'm writing in response to the message you left on my talk page a few days ago about the changes made to Blackpool F.C. What I want to say is that I do not feel I have butchered the page at all. The reason why i got rid of large chunks from the page is that the article was very bloated and cluttered with information which I do not think was necessary for the page. The sections on players that played for international teams for example was very bloated and took up far too much space on the page, there is a reason why no other football pages do this. Other areas like the book and DVD section at the bottom and the excessive information about the supporters fall into the same trap of interesting but not at all needed.

Perhaps I did make too many changes large at once, but I generally feel that the article is much better now than it was before. If that amount of information was added to another bigger team it likely would be shrunk down as well. If you disagree then fair enough, but I'm just here to explain why I did this.

Hope this answers your question. Segavisions1991 (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 FA Vase moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 FA Vase, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 FA Trophy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 FA Trophy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 FA Cup qualifying rounds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 FA Cup qualifying rounds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 FA Trophy (June 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 09:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smithy53! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 FA Cup qualifying rounds (June 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019–20 FA Vase (June 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts Reply

The primary difference between the articles is that one is about events that have yet to occur (see WP:CRYSTALBALL), which as you point out you've only been able to find a single source, whilst the other covers events that have occurred. As I have only been involved in the assessment of the drafts I can only make observations about the other articles but I would assume that, if they have been assessed by other editors, they have determined that whilst no sources have been identified that there are sources available (i.e. results of each of the individual rounds) and as such the article is likely to be considered notable. I hope that answers your query. Dan arndt (talk) 02:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last seasons pages were created around the same time last year and without references with one of those pages (2018-19 FA Trophy) still having no references, so why where they allowed to be displayed but not now?

As I previously stated it was probably because one was about events that had already occurred and the other was about events that may occur in the future. You might want to raise this with the editor who moved the article from the main space to a draft. Dan arndt (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing my point, the page I mentioned that had no references is one that was created in June last year and was updated gradually over the football season (9 months) and not once did this page have any references for whole season and was never moved to draft yet you do for 3 pages which do have a reference.

The next time there should be an update on those 3 pages is when the draw at the beginning of July and it's quite a big update for each page, so why should I or someone else waste my/their time and effort in updating the page when the pages might not be published?

Your thread has been archived

Hi Smithy53! You created a thread called Created Pages Moved To Draft? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Undoing Changes

Well, yes, if you're adding incorrect information to multiple articles then there is bound to be differences across them. You're adding good info, but saying someone moved directly between two clubs, when they were released by the first club, is patently incorrect. - NewTestLeper79 talk 12:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you're saying Wikipedia is consistently inconsistent, preacher meet choir. - 17:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

I checked a few, mostly lower-league, clubs (since they usually seem to confirm squad numbers later than the PL). Mansfield's players without numbers yet are listed alphabetically, as are Crystal Palace. If there's no established guideline, alphabetical makes eminently more sense to me than by position since it's quicker to find a player if listed by last name. - 18:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2019–20 FA Trophy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019–20 FA Trophy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2019–20 FA Vase concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019–20 FA Vase, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Smithy53! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Removal of Article or Article Moved To Draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of serial killers in the United States, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You can re-add the name when the article is created, not before, per the terms of the page. Inexpiable (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Removal of an edit

There is currently no Wikipedia page for that particular serial killer and there is no pending draft. The list is already reasonably long, if we started adding serial killers to the list without a Wikipedia page then the list would go on forever. The name can be added to the list once the article is made. If you're working on the article, publish it, then you can add the name to the list. But if you're not even working on the article then that isn't how this site works. You can't add random serial killers to the list hoping other users are going to create the page for you. If you want a page for that serial killer then you need to make it yourself. Inexpiable (talk) 07:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blackpool F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool F.C. squad

What errors would they be? Giant Snowman 17:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted non-constructive edits, to restore the squad list to the proper format. If players inadvertently got deleted then apologies. Giant Snowman 06:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, your edit was clearly against standard practice. Giant Snowman 07:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:GiantSnowman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]