Talk:The Wizard of Oz on television

Deletion of broadcast history

I removed the long list of the movie's broadcast history as it was overly long, non-notable and tantamount to trivia.--Thepinksuicidallemming 03:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I removed the list again, please take note of why I have done so. If you really feel strongly about what I have done, please say so, so we may reach an agreement.

• Only the first listed airdate was referenced.
• WP:NOT#DIR points out an almost identicle example
• List is tantamount to trivia. See WP:TRIV. This does not include any notable airing that have already been addressed in the body of the article.
• I haven't even touched on the fact that the entire article (not only the list) is limited to airings in the United States. But this is another problem.

--Thepinksuicidallemming 04:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't consider it trivia. The fact that the film was telecast twice in 1991 by CBS is important, considering the fact that it had previously been telecast only once a year. If you had left the dates in, they would have remained as verification of when the movie was telecast. AlbertSM (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Why was a referenced fact removed?

I added a New York Times reference which said the film was first shown in 1956, which someone later removed, and added the claim that it was first seen in 1959 [1]. Why? Added back the ref, since this aarticle has been cirticized for lack of refs in the AFD for the article listing all the showtimes [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizard Of Oz - Television Airdates]. Edison 19:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The claim that the film was trimmed to ninety minutes for its 1956 showing is highly questionable, although I was not old enough to see it in that year. I have, however, been watching it on TV since 1959, and I can certainly vouch for the fact that, despite commercial breaks, the film was shown complete in a two-hour time slot between 1959 and 1968.AlbertSM 01:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Worldwide view

Four months on from my first encounter with this page and I think I should actually add this template. This article deals with the movie on American TV only, despite the fact that many other nations are highly likely to have screened it (I know it's shown every couple of years in Australia).--Thepinksuicidallemming 09:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Appallingly American-centric article. The Wizard of Oz is shown every year here in Britain and indeed is one of the main films of the Christmas period, The Sound of Music the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panthro (talk • contribs) 02:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

That would be difficult to research for an American editor. You are in Britain: what have you done to remedy this lack? — Walloon (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Details

It has to be asked — gently, but necessarily: Is there anyone on this planet who really needs to know the exact date on which The Wizard of Oz was shown on TV every year from 1959 to the present? — Walloon (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

No one needs to know, in the sense that it's not a matter of life and death, but it certainly makes for interesting trivia, especially if you are old enough to have fond memories of the time in which the film was gaining its now-classic status because of its television showings.AlbertSM (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

This is not interestingtrivia.org; it's wikipedia.org. - JasonAQuest (talk) 23:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

That does not make those facts any less interesting. Furthermore, there are people still around (I am one of them) who would like to remember those dates, and I think it adds to an enhancement of this article, for people who weren't around then, to know just how The Wizard of Oz used to be shown on television.AlbertSM (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Changes made in running time: time compression

Time compression on video tape is usually accomplished by speeding up the playback slightly on a VTR equipped with dynamic tracking for the video and pitch-shifting for the audio. This results in a fairly smooth picture with some residual vertical stepping effects. The audio is pitch-corrected to avoid the "chipmunk" effect mentioned in the main article. This is necessary to compensate for the increase in pitch introduced by speeding up the playback. Thomprod (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe now, but not when I saw it in time compression back in the 1980's. It was almost painful. You had to listen closely, but if you did, you could detect it. AlbertSM (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

April 20th NBC HD section

I have deleted this section because, first of all, it was rather irrelevant, and second, the film did not air at all on NBC until 1968, and certainly not in HD. HD television did not even exist until recently. AlbertSM (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Page vandalism

Someone has recently vandalized this page, putting in a bunch of phony dates on which the film did not air, and including a totally irrelevant section entitled "Gifted presents". I have removed all the vandalism.AlbertSM (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

What in God's name is wrong with the website? I can't post on it!AlbertSM (talk) 00:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

My browser closes when I try to edit. Why?AlbertSM (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Canadian broadcasts

I have noticed that this is airing on Mpix in Canada this month. Should this be added to the broadcast history of the article?[2] NorthernThunder (talk) 00:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Editing the article

Why can't anybody edit the article?AlbertSM (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Wrong article

This is great info, but too detailed for this article. It should be relocated elsewhere in Wikipedia:

--Walt Disney, television pioneer-- Feature films by nearly all of the major Hollywood studios were not broadcast on network television before 1955, due to the studios' reluctance to anger theatre owners with a competing venue. The one exception was Walt Disney, who, understanding the potential of the medium as a promotional tool, did not hesitate to begin showing some of his films on ABC-TV once his long-running television anthology series premiered in late 1954. Disney films first shown on the program in the 1950s (in one-hour edited versions) included Alice in Wonderland (1951), So Dear to My Heart (1948), and Dumbo (1941), although occasionally a full-length Disney film such as Treasure Island (1950) would be split into two one-hour episodes shown a week apart. Several of these films were re-run on the Disney program in color when the program moved to NBC in the 1960s, and nearly all of these mentioned were re-released to movie theatres even after being shown on television. Some of the most famous old Disney films, however, such as Bambi (1942) and Pinocchio (1940), were not shown complete on television (or even in one-hour edits) until the 1980s, and Fantasia (1940) and Song of the South (1946) are the two remaining Disney classics which, even today, have never been televised complete or in one-hour versions. (Most segments of Fantasia, however, have been televised separately on Disney's long-running anthology series.) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) was telecast complete for the first time ever (but with commercials) in February 2010. However, it also made its television debut on the commercial-free Disney Channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.249.134.57 (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

References

Lead

I've tagged the article for its lead section. The is supposed to be summary of the article, a few paragraphs long. This lead is far too overdetailed and redundant and violates WP:LEAD guidelines. It needs to be severely condensed. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't think it's redundant at all. Some of the phrasing may be awkward and I have corrected that, but every sentence tells you something that wasn't mentioned in the previous one. I don't see anything wrong with the tone of the article, either.AlbertSM (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid that sidesteps the point: It's not that one sentence doesn't build onto another, it's that it's dense overdetail that's inappropriate for an article lead, as you'll see upon reading WP:LEAD. This says the lead should be no more than four paragraphs long and should be "a concise overview".

Also, I said nothing about the article WP:TONE, so I'm confused about your comment in that regard. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Also, I've just seen in the article's history that you've written the bulk of it including that lead, so with all respect it's very important that in order to avoid WP:OWN you let other editors do whatever is needed to in order to address the tags and bring this article up to guideline standards. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to assume good faith, but it's difficult when AlbertSM over the last few days has demonstrated remarkably clear WP:OWN behavior. This includes restoring uncited POV claims, WP:PUFFERY and [{WP:TONE]] violations, and reinsertions of IMDb, which Wikipedia disallows for reference citations.

I'm not sure how it's unclear to this editor that these violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I'm concerned this is going to have to go to an RfC or involve admin intervention. And while a lot of problems remain in the article, as the multi-tag box indicates, these edits are clearly violative. I asked for discussion on Feb. 25, and he has not responded. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Date of first telecast

Someone keeps changing the date of the first telecast of the film from 1956 to 1959. This is incorrect. The film was first telecast on November 3, 1956. CBS waited three years to rebroadcast it, so the second telecast took place in 1959. After that, the film began airing annually.AlbertSM (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

The New York Times citations are wonderful and greatly welcomed. We still need citing on the exact date of the first broadcast. I'll check Brooks/Marsh. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Found cite for the Nov. 3, 1956, date, and upgraded a cite that was misdirecting. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2013 (U

Days of the week on which the film was telecast

Actually, there is such a list in this article, reportedly culled from TV Guide. AlbertSM (talk) 23:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Cool. Just needs a cite — and you've done good work in finding those archival New York Times citations that I then fleshed out a bit. "Reportedly" is one of those dangerous "weasel words", as Wikipedia calls them. But I'm sure between the two of us we'll find a good citation. It's nice to be collaborating better. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Uncited personal commentary

I know it's well-meant and it was added in good faith, but this is uncited personal commentary and violates WP:POV. It's also OR speculation: "must have been" ... "most likely" ... We just can't say these types of things in an encyclopedia. This whole article is written like a personal essay and it really needs an enormous amount of work to be brought up to encyclopedic standard.

The impression left by the telecasting of a film in color must have been far greater on viewers then, when color television was rare, than it is now, when it is taken for granted. This was most likely true up until 1965, the year that the three networks began switching to all-color broadcasting, after having shown a significant part of their daily schedules in black-and-white since the early days of television.

We also can't cite a wiki as a reference source. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Intricate detail

I don't see how inclusion of intricate detail "which may interest only a specific audience" would ruin an article. Since when has tailoring an article to a specific audience been wrong? Most classical music articles are tailored to specific audiences. And we must remember that many members of today's viewing audience were simply either not around or are too young to remember the early telecasts of "The Wizard of Oz". AlbertSM (talk) 01:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I meant the listing of every U.S. broadcast and cable showing ever, which would seem to be of limited interest. Trivialist (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Editing and removing citations

I have had to add (and re-add) a citation to the phrase the film was always shown during or just before the spring months three times because someone always keeps removing it and putting citation needed. The citation I added is correct, and proves that during that period (1968 to 1991) the film was indeed shown during or just before the spring months. AlbertSM (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleting of list of fantasy specials

I posted a list of fantasy specials aired in the wake of the Mary Martin Peter Pan. I think it's helpful in showing why CBS decided to telecast The Wizard of Oz in the first place, and I think that section should be reinstated. AlbertSM (talk) 19:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

The move to cable

I made this into a new section because I changed the title of one section into "Telecasts in the pre-cable era", and as it was, "The move to cable" just looked like a subheading underneath it. Please do not change it back. AlbertSM (talk) 18:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Citations

Tenebrae, why do you revert my changes whenever I try to cite from the "Wonderful Wizard of Oz website? It seems to be that this is as valid a site from which to get information as any. AlbertSM (talk) 01:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

It's a self-published fan site (see that bluelink and WP:RS generally). And while Eric Gjovaag himself seems to be published in fanzines, he's not a recognized mainstream authority. But let's say fanzine publication makes him authoritative — his information still is all coming from other sources, so we need to cite the actual, authoritative, published original sources. Finally, we can't cite anything at all from http://thewizardofoz.info/wiki/Main_Page, since Wikipedia disallows us, quite reasonably so, to use wikia as reference sources. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

I would also note that The Wizard of Oz (1939 film) article itself is perfectly well-cited without using this self-published fan site, which no one there appears to ever have used except you yourself, in June 2013, when you presumably knew that fan sites aren't reliable sources for reference citations. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

That fan site, however, presumably got the dates of the telecasts from TV Guide, those same dates that were deleted before. AlbertSM (talk) 03:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

"Presumably"? An encyclopedia really can't really be built on a foundation of guesswork. Aside from the fact that preemptions happen after TV Guide goes to press — as TV Guide itself always cautioned in its pages about its listings — if a claim is true, we can find it in a reliable source. But we can certainly cite the issue and page of TV Guide or the TV-listings page of a newspaper (many vintage papers are available as Google scans) as to scheduled airdates. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

As for today's edit, we also can't include uncited personal opinion or original-research observation. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

wrong time for 1965 and 1966

In 1965 and 1966, "The Wizard of OZ" aired at 7pm, not 6pm, according to TV listings in the Boston Globe and numerous smaller newspapers in New York State and California...all can be viewed on-line. Also on-line is a 1965 ad from TV Guide giving the time as 7-9pm. 108.20.114.62 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)