Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Archive 19) (bot
Line 63: Line 63:


I've boldly nominated this template for deletion as it no longer appears to serve any functional purpose: see discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 31#Template:V0.5]]. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 23:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I've boldly nominated this template for deletion as it no longer appears to serve any functional purpose: see discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 31#Template:V0.5]]. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 23:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

== Is this project inactive? ==

Looking at the project page listing the last release at over a decade ago. Some sort of overhaul of the content would be good to give folks an idea of where this is up to would be good...{{ping|Walkerma}}? cheers, [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 20:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 12 September 2019

Wikipedia 1.0 — (talk)
FAQTo do
Release version tools
Guide(talk)(stats)
Article selection process
(talk)
Version 0.8 bot selection
Version 0.8 feedback
IRC channel (IRC)

Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.8 release
(manual selection) (t)
"Selection" project (Talk)

schools selection
Offline WP for Indian Schools


CORE TOPICS
CORE SUPPLEMENT
Core topics - 1,000
(Talk) (COTF) (bot)
TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
WORK VIA WIKI
PROJECTS
(talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)

Static content subcom.

If you are new to this page, please see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAQs.

Core topics discussionsWiki sort discussionsFAs first discussionsWork via WikiProjects discussionsPushing to 1.0 discussions

Archives

Template:Wikipedia ad exists

Alternate process

While WP 1.0 bot is blocked, there is a way to get current article counts (assessment wikitable) for your WikiProjects. Follow the two-step process below.

  1. Generate new project data - At Update project data page, choose your Wikiproject & click the Go button. Depending on how busy enwp10 tool is there may be considerable wait time. After completion, run step two.
  2. Display project table - At Project summary tables page, choose your Wikiproject and click the Make table button.
Not only bookmarked on a laptop, but also a desktop. Anyone doing this must remember to call each of the bookmarks differently to avoid confusion. Adamdaley (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the workaround. I've commented out the template link to the bot-imported assessment table and added a direct link to the tool-based table on our WikiProject pages. I'd advise other WikiProjects to do the same until the ownership issue is resolved. LibraryGeek (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 21, 2018 - enwp10 not running, again.

Scripts on https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10 are not running ... links to this server just hang and (eventually) timeout. LibraryGeek (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As of this writing, that link works just fine and a random check of assessments from various pages generated by the tool shows that it's keeping up with changes in assessments. It's the logs I came here to show concern for. The log for the WP I mainly do assessments for was last updated on November 4, 2018. There have been lengthy gaps like that before, but it causes me to wonder if this is one more subproject that's slowly going the way of the dinosaurs. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@RadioKAOS and LibraryGeek: - Our people are working on fixing the code as time allows, but we haven't seen any progress as yet. Also, they are working on writing completely new code, to try and avoid the problems we've been having. In the meantime, you can request a one-off log update, and I think those are still working, if you need one urgently. Once I hear of significant progress, I'll update - but the best place to check is the WP1.0 technical talk page. Walkerma (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The new code had a couple of bugs, but they have been fixed and it's now working OK on a test set of 22 projects, though it's only updating the tables for the time being. Hopefully we can get updates across all WikiProjects soon. Walkerma (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update, waiting with anticipation for the next set of projects. Keith D (talk) 12:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Keith D:It seems that all is going smoothly now, so we're planning to switch things over completely to the new Python code soon. Walkerma (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Walkerma: Thanks for update. Looks like it has been running regularly with no obvious problems for last month, apart from a missing one on 2 April. So I would go for all projects when you can. Keith D (talk) 15:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfC of interest

this RfC may be of interet to the members of this project. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've boldly nominated this template for deletion as it no longer appears to serve any functional purpose: see discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 31#Template:V0.5. PC78 (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this project inactive?

Looking at the project page listing the last release at over a decade ago. Some sort of overhaul of the content would be good to give folks an idea of where this is up to would be good...@Walkerma:? cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]