Jump to content

Talk:Israel–Lebanon relations: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Deleted pointless, non-sequitur opinion
Line 10: Line 10:
This article, as well as [[Israel–Syria relations]] and [[Iraq–Israel relations]], is quite problematic. It's not just that the states of Israel and Lebanon hasn't 'normal relationshiå', but Lebanon, Syria and Iraq does not (and has never) recognized the state of Israel. Thus having articles included in 'Bilateral relations of ...' categories become misleading. My proposal is to make some changes in these articles, making clear that they are not part of the 'x country-y country relations' articles, remove them from the 'foreign relations' templates and to make them as articles categorized under the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]] instead. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 08:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
This article, as well as [[Israel–Syria relations]] and [[Iraq–Israel relations]], is quite problematic. It's not just that the states of Israel and Lebanon hasn't 'normal relationshiå', but Lebanon, Syria and Iraq does not (and has never) recognized the state of Israel. Thus having articles included in 'Bilateral relations of ...' categories become misleading. My proposal is to make some changes in these articles, making clear that they are not part of the 'x country-y country relations' articles, remove them from the 'foreign relations' templates and to make them as articles categorized under the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]] instead. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 08:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
: Not sure what became of this. I do understand the rationale here however I feel that the aim of the articles is to explain bilateral relations - Israel and Syria do have bilateral relations even though they do not have formal diplomatic relations and Syria does not recognise Israel's right to exist. They interact at the UN (perhaps speaking at rather than to each other), and they interact through intermediaries, including the [[UN]] and [[Red Cross]] right at the cease-fire line. Conflict is also a form of relationship, albeit a generally undesirable one. Ergo, I think the articles should stay as they are. [[User:Robert Brockway|Robert Brockway]] ([[User talk:Robert Brockway|talk]]) 11:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
: Not sure what became of this. I do understand the rationale here however I feel that the aim of the articles is to explain bilateral relations - Israel and Syria do have bilateral relations even though they do not have formal diplomatic relations and Syria does not recognise Israel's right to exist. They interact at the UN (perhaps speaking at rather than to each other), and they interact through intermediaries, including the [[UN]] and [[Red Cross]] right at the cease-fire line. Conflict is also a form of relationship, albeit a generally undesirable one. Ergo, I think the articles should stay as they are. [[User:Robert Brockway|Robert Brockway]] ([[User talk:Robert Brockway|talk]]) 11:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
:::if Israel is a democracy, then sure Hitler was a democrat too. ridiculous. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.60.142.240|91.60.142.240]] ([[User talk:91.60.142.240|talk]]) 17:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The photo of rescuing of the woman is a PR photo from IDF. Is it possible to show this more clearly to the reader?
The photo of rescuing of the woman is a PR photo from IDF. Is it possible to show this more clearly to the reader?

Revision as of 00:51, 19 September 2019

Different model?

This article, as well as Israel–Syria relations and Iraq–Israel relations, is quite problematic. It's not just that the states of Israel and Lebanon hasn't 'normal relationshiå', but Lebanon, Syria and Iraq does not (and has never) recognized the state of Israel. Thus having articles included in 'Bilateral relations of ...' categories become misleading. My proposal is to make some changes in these articles, making clear that they are not part of the 'x country-y country relations' articles, remove them from the 'foreign relations' templates and to make them as articles categorized under the Arab-Israeli conflict instead. --Soman (talk) 08:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what became of this. I do understand the rationale here however I feel that the aim of the articles is to explain bilateral relations - Israel and Syria do have bilateral relations even though they do not have formal diplomatic relations and Syria does not recognise Israel's right to exist. They interact at the UN (perhaps speaking at rather than to each other), and they interact through intermediaries, including the UN and Red Cross right at the cease-fire line. Conflict is also a form of relationship, albeit a generally undesirable one. Ergo, I think the articles should stay as they are. Robert Brockway (talk) 11:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The photo of rescuing of the woman is a PR photo from IDF. Is it possible to show this more clearly to the reader? The account of how the woman was recued - what is the source? It describes a positive action from IDF, but is this individual incident representative under this heading? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.84.83.189 (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added sources regarding Lebanese GDP and penalties issued for spies and treason convicts in Lebanon (as well as for the de facto suspension of the death penalty in Lebanon) These sources are perfectly reliable (coming straight from the IMF, The Daily Star and a renowned trusted NGO. Any further edits shall be founded on concrete evidence contradicting these already provided, as FACTS are strictly not open for discussion. Thank you Mohammad Abulhassan (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Israel–Lebanon relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 July 2019

There should be a section about the maritime border dispute between Israel and Lebanon, as discussed in these pieces: [1] [2] HeadofNoState (talk) 20:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. You'll need to write the paragraph you want added yourself. Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]