Jump to content

User talk:Sergecross73: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Sergecross73/Archive 73) (bot
Line 125: Line 125:
:I would ''think so'', but I must admit I don’t work in RM in an admin capacity much. I tend to just be a participant at RMs, or make uncontroversial moves upon request rather than through RM. I think as long as you’re open and transparent about it so that it doesn’t look like you’re doing any illegitimate tweaking, you’d be fine. If anyone tells you I’m wrong though...then maybe listen to them. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 16:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
:I would ''think so'', but I must admit I don’t work in RM in an admin capacity much. I tend to just be a participant at RMs, or make uncontroversial moves upon request rather than through RM. I think as long as you’re open and transparent about it so that it doesn’t look like you’re doing any illegitimate tweaking, you’d be fine. If anyone tells you I’m wrong though...then maybe listen to them. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 16:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
::OK thanks, appreciate it. --[[User:GoneIn60|GoneIn60]] ([[User talk:GoneIn60|talk]]) 21:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
::OK thanks, appreciate it. --[[User:GoneIn60|GoneIn60]] ([[User talk:GoneIn60|talk]]) 21:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

== Congratulations! ==

It's nice to see you have learn the error of your ways and just let Sgt. Pepper be deleted from the list. All it took was for someone to call you an idiot.

Revision as of 01:33, 19 September 2019

Vandalism pt 22

Serge's 22nd iteration of his own personal WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. Feel free to report anything you feel may need admin intervention. Sergecross73 msg me 03:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They’re mostly either a bit stale, or only made an edit or two, and are mostly disruptive get FOB, so I protected the talk page, albeit shortly, because it’s a talk page. I added it to my watchlist, so I’ll try to keep an eye on it too. Sergecross73 msg me 19:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn’t take action, since I couldn’t truly tell if they were bad faith or misguided good-faith edits. They’ve stopped all the same, though I can look into it if they start up again. Sergecross73 msg me 02:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see this range was reported above. TarkusABtalk 21:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Should also show that they've been at it since 2017. Notice the similarites between [5] and [6] or how about [7] and [8] TarkusABtalk 21:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
TarkusAB - Apologies, it’s been a busy couple of weeks and I’m behind on responses. Upon glance, I believe this may be indef-blocked tripple-ddd, a troublesome editor who obsesses over Sega divisions/staff/credits, often making questionable judgement calls. He’s been caught socking like 50+ times over the last few years. I protected the Sega dev article. I’ll protect others if he continually disrupts them. Keep me posted. Sergecross73 msg me 01:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, I had forgotten all about that guy. And yet he seemed to remember the minor dispute about emulators 5 years ago like it were yesterday. Yikes. Anyways, he said he wasn’t coming back, so I figured the “past of least resistance may just be warning. He’ll probably make less of a commotion if he thinks he left if his own accord. Please tell me if you see him around again though. Sergecross73 msg me 12:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haha. I'm actually not all too familiar with Persona characters besides the fact that I could probably pound everyone in WP:VG to a pulp with him in Smash Ultimate. JOEBRO64 11:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can we get a long range block please [9] and thank you. TarkusABtalk/contrib 13:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would, but I’m still not well versed in the ways of range blocks. Ferret is usually my go-to on that, but he’s been relatively inactive lately. In the meantime, I’m more than happy to play whack-a-mole if you guys keep reporting individual IPs to me. Sergecross73 msg me 20:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
/32 is too wide and definitely catches other people. No comment on whether they're constructive or not. /64 reblocked for 3 years. My last block on this range had been for a year. -- ferret (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Sundstein

I added an external link, in Faroese, mentioning Jóhan's nationality as Faroese. Apologies for any inconvinience Faroeman92 (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not the type of thing that should be verified through external links. You should be adding it as a reference. See WP:REFB on how to do this if you are unaware. For now, just discuss it on the talk page to make sure there is support for inclusion. Sergecross73 msg me 12:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about RM

Had a quick question that perhaps you could help out with or lend some advice. Recently, a "merge" discussion was started at Talk:Gwazi#Proposed merge with Iron Gwazi. Realizing that this was going to need admin assistance and could possibly be seen as controversial, I closed that discussion and opened a formal WP:RM request. 5 other editors already support the move in the closed discussion. Can those responses be inserted into this RM? Perhaps it would close right at the 7-day mark instead of being extended. That's my main concern. Thanks in advance! --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would think so, but I must admit I don’t work in RM in an admin capacity much. I tend to just be a participant at RMs, or make uncontroversial moves upon request rather than through RM. I think as long as you’re open and transparent about it so that it doesn’t look like you’re doing any illegitimate tweaking, you’d be fine. If anyone tells you I’m wrong though...then maybe listen to them. Sergecross73 msg me 16:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks, appreciate it. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

It's nice to see you have learn the error of your ways and just let Sgt. Pepper be deleted from the list. All it took was for someone to call you an idiot.