Talk:Monsanto legal cases: Difference between revisions
rating |
New section - request to improve article |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
:::A number of editors had already been editing [[Monsanto_legal_cases#RoundUp]] for that in the last month. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 05:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
:::A number of editors had already been editing [[Monsanto_legal_cases#RoundUp]] for that in the last month. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 05:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
::::Well it's nowhere to be found in the article. So let's add it. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">[[User:Minor4th|<b style="color:#000;font-size:100%">Minor</b>]][[User talk:Minor4th|<b style="color:#f00;font-size:80%">4th</b>]]</span></b> 22:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
::::Well it's nowhere to be found in the article. So let's add it. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">[[User:Minor4th|<b style="color:#000;font-size:100%">Minor</b>]][[User talk:Minor4th|<b style="color:#f00;font-size:80%">4th</b>]]</span></b> 22:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::::After rechecking, I found it - it was sort of hidden. I rearranged the paragraphs and cleaned up the wording. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">[[User:Minor4th|<b style="color:#000;font-size:100%">Minor</b>]][[User talk:Minor4th|<b style="color:#f00;font-size:80%">4th</b>]]</span></b> 22:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
:::::After rechecking, I found it - it was sort of hidden. I rearranged the paragraphs and cleaned up the wording. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">[[User:Minor4th|<b style="color:#000;font-size:100%">Minor</b>]][[User talk:Minor4th|<b style="color:#f00;font-size:80%">4th</b>]]</span></b> 22:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)++ |
||
==Needs work== |
|||
This article is such a mess and could be made much better and shorter with good, efficient writing. I am going to alert [[WP:LAW|Project:Law]] to see if I can get some interest in making this article better.<b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">[[User:Minor4th|<b style="color:#000;font-size:100%">Minor</b>]][[User talk:Minor4th|<b style="color:#f00;font-size:80%">4th</b>]]</span></b> 22:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:22, 3 December 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monsanto legal cases article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
Premature edit action
The Bold - Revert - Discuss cycle is a useful part of Wikipedia procedure.
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Monsanto legal cases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130302160548/http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/print.php?article=120 to http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/print.php?article=120
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121109090402/http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib-agricultural-information-bulletin/aib786.aspx to http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib-agricultural-information-bulletin/aib786.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313033656/http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/10-1068.pdf to http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/10-1068.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905011001/http://scc.lexum.org/en/2004/2004scc34/2004scc34.html to http://scc.lexum.org/en/2004/2004scc34/2004scc34.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217134621/http://www.brookspierce.com/news-publications-10.html to http://www.brookspierce.com/news-publications-10.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150108132339/http://www.epo.org/news-issues/issues/melon.html to http://www.epo.org/news-issues/issues/melon.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131006060813/http://legalnewsline.com/news/236012-ala.-sc-makes-ruling-in-cases-over-300m-monsanto-settlement to http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/236012-ala.-sc-makes-ruling-in-cases-over-300m-monsanto-settlement
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2003/09/60132?currentPage=all
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016004552/https://articles.law360.s3.amazonaws.com/0228000/228390/monsanto.pdf to http://articles.law360.s3.amazonaws.com/0228000/228390/monsanto.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903061851/http://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/index.php/environment/9839-changes-to-the-contaminated-land-regime to http://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/index.php/environment/9839-changes-to-the-contaminated-land-regime
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
section on Roundup
This should be added to the section on Roundup. The judgement against Monsanto amounted to 298 million dollars with much of it puntiative damages. The source is here. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/08/lawsuit-brings-289-million-verdict-against-maker-of-roundup-weed-killer/Claustro123 (talk) 02:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Also there is more here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/10/business/monsanto-roundup-cancer-trial.html
Claustro123 (talk) 02:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- There's a bit of work going into this right now actually. We do have to be careful because it is generally considered in the independent scientific community to be WP:FRINGE that glyphosate causes cancer as alleged. WP:DUE with that in mind is why there's a delay, but I'm working on summarizing some sources right now. There's likely to be upcoming commentary on it in the coming week since it's still the weekend for a lot of scientists, so it doesn't hurt to wait a little bit in terms of WP:RECENTISM to really dig into more in-depth content. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- The outcome of the recent verdict against Monsanto needs to be added. It is one of the most significant Monsanto legal cases of late. It's been more than a month since the verdict. Time to update the article. Minor4th 21:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- A number of editors had already been editing Monsanto_legal_cases#RoundUp for that in the last month. Kingofaces43 (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Well it's nowhere to be found in the article. So let's add it. Minor4th 22:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- After rechecking, I found it - it was sort of hidden. I rearranged the paragraphs and cleaned up the wording. Minor4th 22:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)++
- Well it's nowhere to be found in the article. So let's add it. Minor4th 22:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- A number of editors had already been editing Monsanto_legal_cases#RoundUp for that in the last month. Kingofaces43 (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- The outcome of the recent verdict against Monsanto needs to be added. It is one of the most significant Monsanto legal cases of late. It's been more than a month since the verdict. Time to update the article. Minor4th 21:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Needs work
This article is such a mess and could be made much better and shorter with good, efficient writing. I am going to alert Project:Law to see if I can get some interest in making this article better.Minor4th 22:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class Agriculture articles
- Unknown-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- C-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors