Talk:Audrey Assad: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:58, 7 January 2020

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Music Career section needs an update

The Music career section of this article is out of date. It ends with "The House You're Building", ignoring any discography after that (which is in the article itself!). I'll try to update later, but right now I"m tied up on a couple other articles. Luthien22 (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Audrey Assad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120625184252/http://urbanchristiannews.com:80/ucn/2012/02/audrey-assads-heart-receives-rave-reviews-highest-sales.html to http://urbanchristiannews.com/ucn/2012/02/audrey-assads-heart-receives-rave-reviews-highest-sales.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Audrey Assad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130125120125/http://www.hmmagazine.com/2012/02/audrey-assad-gets-five-star-reviews/ to http://www.hmmagazine.com/2012/02/audrey-assad-gets-five-star-reviews/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published interview citations

In addition to adding a tag to call the ReFill team, to fill bare URLs, I added other tags to call attention to pervasive problems (in particular, lack of sourcing for many purported factual statements).

But one tag can be quickly removed, when an editor can speak to a particular WP:OR and WP:VERIFY issue. The article repeatedly cites a source by "Amos, Evan", which links to an interview transcription at commons. Apparently, a WP editor called up the artist, asked a series of questions, and then posted the transcript to commons. This appears to me to be an attempt to do an "end-around" WP prohibitions of original research and self-published material—i.e., material appearing in WP for the very first time—in particular, material that lacks reliability because it is presented without the participation of a publisher, where fact-checking or other journalistic standards might expect to be applied. The "Amos, Evan" citation appears to violate WP policies and guidelines, in this regard, and I think should be removed.

Otherwise, the article's sources were given a "once-over", and made more uniform, and completed where such was possible. Cases where content in the article was not found in the citation were removed (e.g., see the Billboard 200 entry, now in Further reading). Note, there are still many places where citations are lacking (inline tags placed after checking the nearby citations), and several examples where the only source cited is a personal Tweet or Facebook post of the article subject. Hence, the refimprove tag at the article head.

Finally, I understand the perspective that one need not over-tag. But the appearance of some sentences with ^{[citation needed]} tags does not mean that all sentences have been checked—they have not, in today's edits—and so the reader, coming to the article or to a section, is entitled to a warning that the content they are reading is less reliable than they might hope. Cheers, and happy New Year, fellow editors who care about reliability at WP. 2601:246:C700:19D:A098:24BE:6BDE:95CA (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
+== Self-published interview citations ==
+In addition to adding a tag to call the ReFill team, to fill bare URLs, I added other tags to call attention to pervasive problems (in particular, lack of sourcing for many purported factual statements).
+But one tag can be quickly removed, when an editor can speak to a particular WP:OR and WP:VERIFY issue. The article repeatedly cites a source by "Amos, Evan", which links to an interview transcription at commons. Apparently, a WP editor called up the artist, asked a series of questions, and then posted the transcript to commons. This appears to me to be an attempt to do an "end-around" WP prohibitions of original research and self-published material—i.e., material appearing in WP for the very first time—in particular, material that lacks reliability because it is presented without the participation of a publisher, where fact-checking or other journalistic standards might expect to be applied. The "Amos, Evan" citation appears to violate WP policies and guidelines, in this regard, and I think should be removed.
+Otherwise, the article's sources were given a "once-over", and made more uniform, and completed where such was possible. Cases where content in the article was not found in the citation were removed (e.g., see the Billboard 200 entry, now in Further reading). Note, there are still many places where citations are lacking (inline tags placed after checking the nearby citations), and several examples where the only source cited is a personal Tweet or Facebook post of the article subject. Hence, the refimprove tag at the article head.
+Finally, I understand the perspective that one need not over-tag. But the appearance of some sentences with {{cn}} tags does not mean that all sentences have been checked—they have not, in today's edits—and so the reader, coming to the article or to a section, is entitled to a warning that the content they are reading is less reliable than they might hope. Cheers, and happy New Year, fellow editors who care about reliability at WP. [[Special:Contributions/2601:246:C700:19D:A098:24BE:6BDE:95CA|2601:246:C700:19D:A098:24BE:6BDE:95CA]] ([[User talk:2601:246:C700:19D:A098:24BE:6BDE:95CA|talk]]) 17:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)