User talk:173.67.205.203: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:36, 24 March 2020

The Kid

Hello,

I noticed you remove Jake Schur from the wiki page The Kid. The wiki page has several sources claiming this actor is portraying a major character in the film. The citations provided prove that Jake Schur is portraying the title character. Please reply to this discussion before editing on The Kid again. Thank you.

Cardei012597 Cardei012597 (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:173.67.205.203, please respond. Cardei012597 (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Read through this reference: Fleming Jr., Mike (September 20, 2017). "Vincent D'Onofrio Sets Jake Schur In Title Role Of 'The Kid'". Deadline. Retrieved January 4, 2019. He is the title character. Cardei012597 (talk) 23:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with Angel Has Fallen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Pokémon: Sun & Moon: Ultra Legends episodes (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft was resubmitted before administrative action was taken on the request to redact copyright violations. Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously, and cannot consider promoting a draft into article space that has copyright violations in its history. If this draft is resubmitted again before the copyright violations are resolved, it may be nominated for deletion, or a block may be requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Pokémon: Sun & Moon: Ultra Legends episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Pokémon: Sun & Moon: Ultra Legends episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from removing ^{[citation needed]} tags without adding the requested citations, attacking other editors in edit summaries, and repeatedly reinserting unsourced WP:BLP into articles after it has been challenged. This kind of behaviour frequently leads to editors being blocked from editing. You have been warned. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STOP attacking other editors in edit summaries.[1] This is your last warning. If you are citing a different source from the one already linked inline, there are polite ways to say that. Implying that it should be a given to have seen your source and repeatedly questioning their intelligence for not having somehow figured out what you are talking about is not one of them. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm TheDoDahMan. Your recent edit(s) to the page Bumblebee (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDoDahMan (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Aranya. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Doctor Sleep (2019 film). Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Aranya (talk | contribs) 04:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Mulan (2020 film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The Fountain

Some editors have ideas that cast sections are unnecessary, and when they have an excuse they will remove the section. They will usually say the "Casting" section (or sometimes the Infobox) already contains that information. There are other editors who don't like having the actors names included directly in the Plot section either.

Between those two groups you end up with articles that can be slightly more difficult to quickly skim read but ultimately the information is all there somewhere. See WP:MOSFILM#Cast point 3, which doesn't quite summarize all the arguments and discussion behind cast sections. I'm not going to revert your changes but someone else probably will, and they probably wont even bother to explain either. -- 109.76.221.165 (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Sleep

Hello, here are the actor details we have:

Trailer shows "Ewan McGregor / Rebecca Ferguson / Doctor Sleep / and Cliff Curtis"
YouTube page says, "'Doctor Sleep' stars Ewan McGregor ('Star Wars: Episodes I, II & III,' 'T2 Trainspotting') as Dan Torrance, Rebecca Ferguson (the 'Mission: Impossible' films, 'The Greatest Showman') as Rose the Hat, and Kyliegh Curran, in her major feature film debut, as Abra. The main ensemble cast also includes Carl Lumbly, Zahn McClarnon, Emily Alyn Lind, Bruce Greenwood, Jocelin Donahue, Alex Essoe and Cliff Curtis."

The "and Cliff Curtis" bit seen in the trailer, in billing-block terminology, means "such words tend to be used when a major star has a small but significant role". See breakdown. This is further confirmed by Cliff Curtis being at the end of the sentence in the YouTube page's description.

Further, the official site repeats McGregor, Ferguson, and Curran together twice here:

"Ewan McGregor, Rebecca Ferguson and newcomer Kyliegh Curran star in the supernatural thriller, directed by Mike Flanagan, from his own screenplay based upon the novel by Stephen King."

"'Doctor Sleep' stars Ewan McGregor ('Star Wars: Episodes I, II & III,' 'T2 Trainspotting') as Dan Torrance, Rebecca Ferguson (the 'Mission: Impossible' films, 'The Greatest Showman') as Rose the Hat, and Kyliegh Curran, in her major feature film debut, as Abra. The main ensemble cast also includes Carl Lumbly, Zahn McClarnon, Emily Alyn Lind, Bruce Greenwood, Jocelin Donahue, Alex Essoe and Cliff Curtis."

Cliff Curtis is not mentioned as starring and is instead mentioned at the very end, which fits the billing-block terminology. So the trio of McGregor, Ferguson, and Curran is the appropriate rule of thumb to have when writing about who is starring. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but when you look at the billing block on the website under the legal tab, it says both Kyliegh Curran and Cliff Curtis in the official billing block.

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at It Chapter Two, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 01:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Grudge (2020 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2019

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge on the Run, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tekken (2009 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 21:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.67.205.203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NinjaRobotPirate is harassing this address in every way possible. People who have used Wikipedia on this address have not done anything wrong in the time this address was unblocked from November 20 to just now. This Household feels like NinjaRobotPirate is just attacking me because they think it’s fun. Not because the address did anything wrong. How is it block evasion when this address doesn’t even have an account? How do you even know that the same person is doing all of this stuff? It could be loads of people. And attacking someone for block evasion, when yo7 don’t even know who’s controlling the account is just wrong. 173.67.205.203 (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's block evasion if you, or anyone else at this IP address, has an active block on another IP address. Blocks apply to people. It doesn't require an account. And yes, we have ways of telling it's the same person. I see nothing wrong with this block. Yamla (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months to prevent you from evading blocks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

173.67.205.203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've waited until I was unblocked to start editing stuff again, and as far as I've seen, I've never done anything wrong. I was just adding stuff that was true. I looked at sources, and added sources as well. I also stopped people from adding false claims like that one editor who was adding names to the cast of Soul, when the sources claim otherwise. Why are you blocking me? Is it because I did something wrong? Or is it just cause you want to harass me? Because this isn't funny if the latter is the case. All I want is to edit freely, while also following the guidelines. If I can't get to do that, then I guess you're just another fake news source.173.67.205.203 (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I've waited until I was unblocked to start editing stuff again, and as far as I've seen, I've never done anything wrong. I was just adding stuff that was true. I looked at sources, and added sources as well. I also stopped people from adding false claims like that one editor who was adding names to the cast of Soul, when the sources claim otherwise. Why are you blocking me? Is it because I did something wrong? Or is it just cause you want to harass me? Because this isn't funny if the latter is the case. All I want is to edit freely, while also following the guidelines. If I can't get to do that, then I guess you're just another fake news source.[[Special:Contributions/173.67.205.203|173.67.205.203]] ([[User talk:173.67.205.203#top|talk]]) 19:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've waited until I was unblocked to start editing stuff again, and as far as I've seen, I've never done anything wrong. I was just adding stuff that was true. I looked at sources, and added sources as well. I also stopped people from adding false claims like that one editor who was adding names to the cast of Soul, when the sources claim otherwise. Why are you blocking me? Is it because I did something wrong? Or is it just cause you want to harass me? Because this isn't funny if the latter is the case. All I want is to edit freely, while also following the guidelines. If I can't get to do that, then I guess you're just another fake news source.[[Special:Contributions/173.67.205.203|173.67.205.203]] ([[User talk:173.67.205.203#top|talk]]) 19:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've waited until I was unblocked to start editing stuff again, and as far as I've seen, I've never done anything wrong. I was just adding stuff that was true. I looked at sources, and added sources as well. I also stopped people from adding false claims like that one editor who was adding names to the cast of Soul, when the sources claim otherwise. Why are you blocking me? Is it because I did something wrong? Or is it just cause you want to harass me? Because this isn't funny if the latter is the case. All I want is to edit freely, while also following the guidelines. If I can't get to do that, then I guess you're just another fake news source.[[Special:Contributions/173.67.205.203|173.67.205.203]] ([[User talk:173.67.205.203#top|talk]]) 19:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 : ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''.<!-- Template:uw-ablock -->
 <!-- Template:uw-ipevadeblock -->
+{{unblock|reason=I've waited until I was unblocked to start editing stuff again, and as far as I've seen, I've never done anything wrong. I was just adding stuff that was true. I looked at sources, and added sources as well. I also stopped people from adding false claims like that one editor who was adding names to the cast of Soul, when the sources claim otherwise. Why are you blocking me? Is it because I did something wrong? Or is it just cause you want to harass me? Because this isn't funny if the latter is the case. All I want is to edit freely, while also following the guidelines. If I can't get to do that, then I guess you're just another fake news source.[[Special:Contributions/173.67.205.203|173.67.205.203]] ([[User talk:173.67.205.203#top|talk]]) 19:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)}}