Jump to content

User:Yae4: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 7: Line 7:


* [https://web.archive.org/web/20181012174427/https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/ct-xpm-2014-05-21-ct-perspec-climate-0521-20140521-story.html The silencing of global warming critics] - "Whoever undertakes to set himself up as judge in the field of truth and knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20181012174427/https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/ct-xpm-2014-05-21-ct-perspec-climate-0521-20140521-story.html The silencing of global warming critics] - "Whoever undertakes to set himself up as judge in the field of truth and knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."

What [[Paleoclimatology#History_of_the_atmosphere | was happening]] 40-60 [[Paleoclimatology#Reconstructing_ancient_climates|million years ago]] (and how did temperatures compare with now)?


=== Hall of Fame ===
=== Hall of Fame ===

Revision as of 10:36, 5 April 2020

Moron Alert, Anybody knows?

  • Do you know a test in which the theory of anthropogenic global warming could be falsified?
  • What do you think is the proper level of CO-2 in the atmosphere?

What was happening 40-60 million years ago (and how did temperatures compare with now)?

Hall of Fame

Page view chart (clicking Log scale check box is suggested)

Page view chart (clicking Log scale check box is suggested)

Why I no longer do Did You Know for new articles

The objectives are good, but results I observed did not meet enough of the objectives to support continued involvement. Sure, there was a blip in page views, for one day. The hope was interested editors would help improve the articles after they appeared on DYK. Actual results were no edits, vandalism[1][2][3] or not much better.[4] Most of the article improvements came from interaction with DYK reviewers, but I found the process to be difficult. "Bring me another rock"[5] is how I'd describe the process, although surprisingly it is not frequently referenced in Wikipedia.[6][7] "Bring me another hook" is a somewhat fun game to play, but it's a variation of "bring me another rock," and it took far too much effort for the short time the hook was used on the home page. So, I thank the editors who helped improve the new articles and create hooks for my 5 DYKs, but I'm dropping out of the league. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hall of Shame (or Articles FUBAR'd by climate change alarmists)

Page view chart (clicking Log scale check box is suggested)

Other Efforts

Page view chart (clicking Log scale check box is suggested)

Intro

No associations or affiliations to declare. Long experience with several android devices, and computers running GNU/Linux or BSD. Tests services and software from /e/, Purism, LineageOS, microG, and others. Had good, bad, and awful experiences. Tries to be neutral, but dislikes advertising and popularity contests driving Wikipedia. Will support deleting advertising, and adding criticism. The truth shall make you free.

-- Yae4 (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
This user is in the free and open-source software task force.
This user participates in
WikiProject Biography.

I hesitate to put this summary here, but because I'm being repeatedly accused of bias or COI, because block logs get re-organized and confused, and because | Caliwing AKA Indidea is requesting Unblock, here it is for reference and background.

Some things I've learned about eelo AKA /e/ and e foundation by participating at Wikipedia:

The renaming of eelo to /e/ for trademark name issues is a repeat mistake by e's founder. Mandrake GNU/Linux previously had to be renamed for the same reason. This is not in the e ROM articles because it hasn't been made notable by reliable sources.

The /e/ ROM article was started in late November 2018 by Mnair69. According to e foundation's about pages and forums, he was and is their "community leader." He was investigated for sockpuppetry (and meat puppetry) in December 2018 during the Article for Deletion discussion. No administrator action was taken:

e ROM Articles for Deletion

Mnair69 Sockpuppet investigation

At that time the suspected meat puppets' associations were not disclosed. Now several likely (Conflict of Interest) associations are apparent. Indidea is likely e's founder, and has been blocked for spam/promotion. One is an active supporter on e's telegram and forums. Another is a developer for e foundation. At least two others are members of e's Board.

Most of those user accounts are mostly inactive since the AfD, but the article, and related articles were significantly edited by Caliwing and Indidea . Indidea was blocked for being an obvious spam ID, connected with e foundation's founder's personal blog (web search "Indidea"). Caliwing and Indidea accounts were found to be sockpuppets, and Caliwing was blocked: Indidea AKA Caliwing Sockpuppet Investigation

IANAL, but this all looks like violation of European Fair-trade law: Wikipedia Conflict of Interest - European Fair Trade Law

-- Yae4 (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC) & Yae4 (talk) 22:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Resources

User script

  • Notifier: Notifies other talk pages of a discussion on the current page

Task center

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Yae4&oldid=949240467"