User talk:NawJee

hello.how do you make an article.

Please take this to Wikipedia:Teahouse. The hosts would be glad to help you with any queries you may have. NawJee (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need help with an edit, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, About watchlists, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft improvement or deletion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Lack of references in an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NawJee

Thank you for creating Saguenay Fire.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@North8000:, thank you. I have written articles about a number of other wildfires, as well. If you don't mind, please have a look at them and let me know how I can improve them and other wildfire articles I intend to write. Thanks! NawJee (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@NawJee: Thanks. The new article review is usually pretty quick. The 20 most active reviewers need to handle about 700 articles per day. I'd be happy to take a closer look at Saguenay Fire for starters. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@North8000: Oh, wow! I didn't know that. Good lord, sounds like quite a bit of work. And sure thing, that works perfectly. I can apply your suggestions to other pages, then. Thank you so much. NawJee (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll do it two ways. Where I can I'll just make and explain a few edits. Feel free to undo if you wish. And for other I'll ask questions / provide feedback here. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I took a look and made one change and explained. Previously, after a brief look, I saw a lot of unexplained/ambiguous sentences and figured that I'd be giving you advice on this. But, upon close look, those shortcomings appear to be coming from the sources, not the Wikipedia editor. North8000 (talk) 15:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

For example:" The fire destroyed hundreds of miles of forests along its shores." What's "it"?; a fire does not have shores. And "150 miles" alone doesn't say anything.

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Good edits vs. Okay edits, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello NawJee. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NawJee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NawJee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Yunshui ^雲_水 06:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Yunshui:, hope you're doing well. I understand the policies regarding paid editing and I don't have any connection to the subjects of the articles I've written and published. NawJee (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Not only do I struggle to believe that, but your recent page creations at Draft:Bridger Aerospace and Draft:Xeros Technology Group are also in clear violation of the unblock conditions you agreed to at User_talk:NawJee/Archive_1#Unblock. I am therefore restoring the indefinite block on your account. Yunshui ^雲_水 06:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Yunshui:, I just re-read the conditions provided by ToBeFree and MER-C. I thought that it is okay if I create articles through AfC. I just checked that ToBeFree had said that I shouldn't create articles and drafts about living persons, recently deceased people, and companies. This is an honest mistake and I hope you will understand. NawJee (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Fire

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi NawJee! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Avoiding edit conflicts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodbury Fire has been accepted

Woodbury Fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Paul Orajiaka moved to draftspace

You were unblocked on the condition that you submit all articles through AfC and do not create them in mainspace, [1] as such I'm moving Paul Orajiaka and Moving Mountains (company) back to draft. Spicy (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Spicy:, I thought that was for new articles only. Thanks for the check. I'll keep it in mind, look for additional references and updates, and put them through AfC. NawJee (talk) 19:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NawJee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, my account has been blocked again due to a simple oversight on my part. I wrongly believed that I can create articles about notable subjects as long as I publish them through the AfC process. However, I checked the conditions provided by ToBeFree and MER-C after this block was placed and realized that I had to have that restriction removed through a discussion with the administrators. Can my account be unblocked now, please? NawJee (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi, my account has been blocked again due to a simple oversight on my part. I wrongly believed that I can create articles about notable subjects as long as I publish them through the AfC process. However, I checked the conditions provided by [[User:ToBeFree|ToBeFree]] and [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] after this block was placed and realized that I had to have that restriction removed through a discussion with the administrators. Can my account be unblocked now, please? [[User:NawJee|NawJee]] ([[User talk:NawJee#top|talk]]) 16:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, my account has been blocked again due to a simple oversight on my part. I wrongly believed that I can create articles about notable subjects as long as I publish them through the AfC process. However, I checked the conditions provided by [[User:ToBeFree|ToBeFree]] and [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] after this block was placed and realized that I had to have that restriction removed through a discussion with the administrators. Can my account be unblocked now, please? [[User:NawJee|NawJee]] ([[User talk:NawJee#top|talk]]) 16:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, my account has been blocked again due to a simple oversight on my part. I wrongly believed that I can create articles about notable subjects as long as I publish them through the AfC process. However, I checked the conditions provided by [[User:ToBeFree|ToBeFree]] and [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] after this block was placed and realized that I had to have that restriction removed through a discussion with the administrators. Can my account be unblocked now, please? [[User:NawJee|NawJee]] ([[User talk:NawJee#top|talk]]) 16:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}