User talk:VersaceSpace
| This is VersaceSpace's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
SuggestBot
Max Muscato Page
Hi VersaceSpace. I read you response. Thank you for offer to help, I would like that. I'm new to wikipedia and this is the first page I've created so what would be the next step for us to collaborate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmuscato (talk • contribs) 05:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Maxmuscato, so first off, you're not using external links correctly. Instead of linking to your album via external link, you should just cite that. Also, everything that's unreferenced needs to be either referenced or removed. I also shortened the lead, the only things adequate for the lead are prominent details about you, not your parents, or anybody else. Your brother is an exception since he appears to have greatly influenced your work. versacespacetalk to me 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi VersaceSpace. I removed the links to my album as you instructed. Could you give me an example from my template of when you mentioned "everything thats unreferenced needs to be referenced or removed." I'm a little confused on that. Thank you for shortening the lead and removing certain information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmuscato (talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Maxmuscato! Whenever you want to add content to Wikipedia, the content you add needs to be sourced, generally to a reliable news article. Everything that is not currently sourced needs to be either removed or sourced. For example, the majority of the early life section is not sourced. Most artists have a generally small early life section. View: Doja Cat, Cardi B, Bebe Rexha, Pete Wentz, Rihanna. These articles have small early life sections because there's not a lot of articles about their early lives! Other articles such as Lorde, Taylor Swift, and Diplo, don't even have their own sections for their early life, and instead those elements of their life are incorporated into other sections. It's your choice but I would either shorten or remove that section. Also remember to sign your comment using four tildes (~). versacespacetalk to me 15:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi VersaceSpace. I removed the links to my album as you instructed. Could you give me an example from my template of when you mentioned "everything thats unreferenced needs to be referenced or removed." I'm a little confused on that. Thank you for shortening the lead and removing certain information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmuscato (talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Maxmuscato: hey. I'm writing here because if this thread is not edited a least once per month it will be archived and I won't be able to edit it. If you still need help with your article, I'm here. versacespacetalk to me 12:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Some "Old Fogey" advice
Hi there, VersaceSpace. I've just removed an infobox from your userpage that reveals personal information we generally advise young editors to keep off the project. Please remember that every single user page is publicly visible, and not everyone who reads these pages does so with good intentions. As well, as an Oversighter, I've suppressed the versions of the userpage that included this personal information; however, in this case I have wound up suppressing every single edit to your userpage. I wanted to reach out to you to let you know why you can't look at prior versions of your userpage. You might find [page] provides some really useful principles and tips. As a project, we're interested in helping you to have a safe and enjoyable time as you develop your editing skills. I hope you'll understand what I've done, and why I've done it. If you have any questions, you can reach me at my talk page or use the "Email this User" feature. Risker (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Risker: Is this change rooted in policy or courtesy? If it's the latter, can you please remove your edit to my talk page? versacespacetalk to me 12:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Answering here, to keep the conversation together. The userbox I removed contains material covered under the Oversight policy. I'll un-suppress the edits that don't contain the userbox if you really, really think it is important to you, but please don't re-insert that specific userbox. Please note that the suppression isn't a courtesy in any way; there have historically been cases where this kind of information was abused by bad actors to [attempt to] place one or more young editors in harm's way. This isn't just bad for the young user - it is bad for Wikipedia, too. Frankly, most of that guidance for young editors is applicable to *all* editors. Risker (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Risker: I just read the policy on oversight/supression and it says that information like credit card numbers, home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers are examples of content that should be supressed. Age is not on par with any of those. Even the title of the section is contradictory to the action: Removal of non-public personal information. I made this information public, and for a reason. If I didn't want the information to be there, I would not say it anywhere, let alone on in a large rectangle that can be seen by anyone who opens my userpage. Putting my age on my userpage will not put me in "harm's way", and if it did it would be none of your business - in fact, even if that statement I just made ages badly, it would still be none of your business. versacespacetalk to me 04:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again. I had a look 'round the age-related userboxes. How about {{User teen2}}? BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- I just put that one in, thanks for looking. I had plans to just add that I'm a high schooler but this works too. versacespacetalk to me 12:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again. I had a look 'round the age-related userboxes. How about {{User teen2}}? BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Risker: I just read the policy on oversight/supression and it says that information like credit card numbers, home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers are examples of content that should be supressed. Age is not on par with any of those. Even the title of the section is contradictory to the action: Removal of non-public personal information. I made this information public, and for a reason. If I didn't want the information to be there, I would not say it anywhere, let alone on in a large rectangle that can be seen by anyone who opens my userpage. Putting my age on my userpage will not put me in "harm's way", and if it did it would be none of your business - in fact, even if that statement I just made ages badly, it would still be none of your business. versacespacetalk to me 04:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Answering here, to keep the conversation together. The userbox I removed contains material covered under the Oversight policy. I'll un-suppress the edits that don't contain the userbox if you really, really think it is important to you, but please don't re-insert that specific userbox. Please note that the suppression isn't a courtesy in any way; there have historically been cases where this kind of information was abused by bad actors to [attempt to] place one or more young editors in harm's way. This isn't just bad for the young user - it is bad for Wikipedia, too. Frankly, most of that guidance for young editors is applicable to *all* editors. Risker (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hot Pink (album)
The article Hot Pink (album) you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Hot Pink (album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi VersaceSpace! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:51, Tuesday, March 9, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Super Straight
Your page move just showed up on my watchlist. I would not recommend doing what it looks like you're about to do, which is to move a draft that has already been declined at AfC to the mainspace anyway. It is likely to be deleted. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have not moved it to the mainspace and do not plan to do that until this article is reviewed and eventually passed. versacespacetalk to me 02:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- In the future, please wait until that point before moving mainspace pages around, then. We try to avoid having disambiguated titles (like "Super Straight (song)") when there is no entry at the un-disambiguated page ("Super Straight"). Thanks, GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I moved the pages because the original draft was listed as a "sexual orientation" even though the content in the draft does not state that. That was the primary reason for the move. versacespacetalk to me 02:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I see that you also moved the draft, which is perhaps all you were trying to do, but you also moved a mainspace page: [1]. It's fixed now, either way. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I moved the pages because the original draft was listed as a "sexual orientation" even though the content in the draft does not state that. That was the primary reason for the move. versacespacetalk to me 02:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- In the future, please wait until that point before moving mainspace pages around, then. We try to avoid having disambiguated titles (like "Super Straight (song)") when there is no entry at the un-disambiguated page ("Super Straight"). Thanks, GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Super straight (term) (March 14)
|
Hello, VersaceSpace!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creepTalk 14:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
|
Doja Cat
Courtesy link: Doja Cat
So, from what I've read MOS:IRELEV talks about it. One picture per section should be enough for reader to understand the topic, there is no need for two pictures to be featured in a section about one era, since they portray the same promotion curse with similar visuals. For my deletion of multiple image template from 2021 section, I didn't see anything like that in any other article, I don't think it's needed for collaborators pictures to be featured in Cat's article, until they would be seen on a stage together or something like that. Plus, Minaj picture is a little too big, that's why I added upright parameter. infsai (dyskusja) 22:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Infsai: my question is, what constitutes "too many images"? There's really only two for the Hot Pink era, and the multiple image template showcases her collaborations well. You can change the parameters of the Nicki Minaj photo. versacespacetalk to me 23:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Like I said above, in my opinion there is no need for two pictures to be featured in Hot Pink section, one would be enough to ilustrate this era. And about that multiple image template, in my opinion it's unnecessary. Both of those factors made me call it "too many pictures." infsai (dyskusja) 23:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Infsai: I think it's worth noting that the era in question was stretched out for a very long time, seven singles and over a year and a half (so far) is very long and therefore I think the inclusion of these photos are appropriate. versacespacetalk to me 00:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Long time ago in Lady Gaga article in section about The Fame and The Fame Monster there were also two photos, however only one remained. Taylor Swift's 1989 era also was very long and had 7 singles, but on her article there is only one photo for that era. My point is that even though era might be long, but only one picture would be enough to ilustrate it, since it's only one era. infsai (dyskusja) 08:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Infsai hey! I don't think it's something to fret about, honestly. Also note that perhaps there was only one image in those articles because there was only one appropriate photo. The photos in Doja Cat's article properly demonstrate that part of her career. versacespacetalk to me 12:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Long time ago in Lady Gaga article in section about The Fame and The Fame Monster there were also two photos, however only one remained. Taylor Swift's 1989 era also was very long and had 7 singles, but on her article there is only one photo for that era. My point is that even though era might be long, but only one picture would be enough to ilustrate it, since it's only one era. infsai (dyskusja) 08:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Infsai: I think it's worth noting that the era in question was stretched out for a very long time, seven singles and over a year and a half (so far) is very long and therefore I think the inclusion of these photos are appropriate. versacespacetalk to me 00:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Like I said above, in my opinion there is no need for two pictures to be featured in Hot Pink section, one would be enough to ilustrate this era. And about that multiple image template, in my opinion it's unnecessary. Both of those factors made me call it "too many pictures." infsai (dyskusja) 23:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi VersaceSpace. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 00:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Hello, I'm VersaceSpace. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! versacespacetalk to me 01:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
NOTE TO VIEWERS: TEST EDIT versacespacetalk to me 01:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can try these out in your sandbox if you like, spare your talk page. For an overall look at the warning templates, WP:Template index/User talk namespace is a good place to start. The documentation for each of the templates often has helpful information about when it's appropriate to use them. Happy
editingwarning! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 01:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Article Submission
Hi, I have made the corrections to the article Draft:Abdiqani Sheikh Omar Hassan Please check