Talk:Norton Internet Security

The good article status of this article is being reassessed by an individual editor to determine if the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page, but the decision to list the article as a good article should be left to the editor initiating this reassessment.

^{Date: 08:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)}

Norton Internet Security has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 11, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
February 22, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 7, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
March 7, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 27, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
April 1, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
June 14, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
August 18, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Good article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software GA‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computer Security: Computing GA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Norton Internet Security article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Norton Internet Security/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviewing this article shortly. Techman224^Talk 23:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is a good article?

A good article is— </noinclude>

Well-written: Y
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; Y and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.Y
Verifiable with no original research: Y
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;Y

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); Y and

(c) it contains no original research. Y
Broad in its coverage: Y
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Y and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) Y.
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Y
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Y
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: Y
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; Y and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Y