Jump to content

Talk:Legal recognition of non-binary gender

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ayvind-Bjarnason (talk | contribs) at 01:57, 14 June 2021 (→Portugal has no non-binary gender recognition: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Legal recognition of non-binary gender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Legal recognition of non-binary gender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan, "recognition", 2003 vs. 2009

I thought about reverting this edit, which had an edit summary saying, "Pakistan: earliest Legal recognition of third sex/gender appears to be 2003. Removed inaccurate words about developments in 2009", but decided not to revert it. The edit removed words which it claimed without support to be inaccurate, and removed the source cite which supported the removed words. I see that the unsupported assertion re 2003 in the edit summary is not mentioned in the article. The relevant 2009 events are covered elsewhere in the Pakistan section. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:08, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's time to add Maine to the list: http://www.maine.gov/sos/news/2018/genderdesignationdlid.html

Maybe time to start making a map?

-- 2620:15C:183:202:BA56:C9C:9A25:8941 (talk) 17:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States section

We currently claim that Oregon was the first state to support non-binary gender designations on driver's licenses, but actually it was Arkansas (which we don't mention at all).[1][2] Kaldari (talk) 01:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new paragraph about Arkansas. Kaldari (talk) 02:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please correct the date for colorado recognition, today's date being 18 Nov, how can the date of recognition be 30 Nov? Thanks 84.101.48.162 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States - convert to table?

With so many US states adding legal recognition, taking effect on different dates, with state IDs and/or birth certificates affected, it might be time to make a table to convey this information in a way that makes verification and comparison simpler (e.g. that allows people to see what their state's policy is without reading the entire section). --Jamie7687 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Genderqueer

Category:Genderqueer has been nominated for renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Thought this was relevant to this page and yes I am the nominator. --Devin Kira Murphy (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Germany section

Under the section about Germany, somewhat vague language is used ("is thought to be") that suggests stipulation or the lack of information from a source. Maybe this could be reworded in order to provide a more neutral and factual standpoint. EmilyVisco (talk) 04:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think someone was afraid to be clearer because they didn't want to be accused of being POV. Germany actually did introduce an indeterminate category in 2013 (and thereby was the first European country to have done so), but in the beginning, there was quite some disinformation about what the change actually meant, some people - erroneously - pretending that this was only about postponing the mention in the register as long as the gender wasn't clear. But it had been said in parliament at the occasion of the vote that this could be a life-long status and the courts have subsequently applied it in this way. That being said, I'm not going to be the one who will change the sentence, it's not worth a fight. If you're dauntless enough to do it, good luck... Sigur (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal

The map lists Portugal in the "Non-binary / third gender option available as voluntary opt-in" category, yet the country has no section in the article, nor was I able to find any evidence that that is the case.

Have I misunderstood what that label means? If so, does anyone have any sources we can quote to create a section for Portugal in the article?

Alternatively, should the map be rectified? JNat megaman (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal has no non-binary gender recognition

As the title says, Portugal has no non-binary binary gender recognition. The image presenting the areas with such recognition highlights Portugal. This is just not true. Please change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttvwiki (talk • contribs) 17:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ttvwiki. If you could provide Reliable sources for this information, I will gladly change the map. Alternatively, since anyone can edit Wikipedia, feel free to change the map yourself if you want (provided you have sources backing up your claim). ¡Ayvind! (talk) 01:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

https://g1.globo.com/sc/santa-catarina/noticia/2021/04/12/justica-de-sc-reconhece-direito-de-pessoa-se-declarar-com-genero-neutro.ghtml Nosferattus (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wheres the indonesia subject for the non binary law?

I don't know please explain to us! don't let them carried away! why it just India alone not Indonesia? 125.166.91.114 (talk) 10:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC) I want to see that Indonesia could legalize nonbinary law![reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legal_recognition_of_non-binary_gender&oldid=1028449943"