Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigachad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Chad (slang). RL0919 (talk) 01:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gigachad[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 00:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 00:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 00:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When social media sites are your only sources, it's an easy call to delete. Might have been able to speedy this one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: This is a pretty easy delete, as there's nothing substantive about this topic besides it being a small part of internet meme culture; easily fails WP:GNG. In other news, the nominator is a "gigachad" . Curbon7 (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete This belongs on KnowYourMeme, not Wikipedia. Additionally, user has been vandalizing articles in the past day based on their recent editing history. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, the article doesn't have enough significance, and the references are from Quora, which isn't reliable at all, and it doesn't have enough coverage. It doesn't qualifies for a Wikipedia article. Cheers. Tahaaleem ^Talk 07:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would tag as WP:CSD but I don't see a criteria it strictly fits. Poor writing of the article aside, I'm not finding that the subject meets GNG. I expect the article will get snow deleted at some point. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Per below redirect to Chad (slang) as a plausible search term. Gigachad is basically a variation of the chad slang term. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's not even an article, it's just spam. Artem.G (talk) 20:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I started with db-hoax, reverted myself as it appeared to be an actual meme, and then tried PROD as I couldn't think of a valid CSD at the time, at which point I realized it was listed here. Not sourced, definitely not worthy of an article. It's a bit funny that in being nominated here, it may be around at least 7 days longer than it should, so I say "Get on with it!" ASUKITE 01:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Chad (slang) I don't think this is speedy material because there is a tiny bit of coverage ([1] [2]) , but definitely a GNG fail here. Plausible redirect to Chad (slang). Jumpytoo Talk 02:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - appears to have been created solely for the purposes of vandalism. Zero claim to notability. firefly ( t · c ) 06:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect to Chad (slang). WP:ITEXISTS and there is a tiny bit of news coverage, but does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Chad (slang), plausible search term.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.