Talk:Switzerland

Drug addiction in Switzerland

Hi,

I was reverted for reinstating a long-standing material and sourced to WP:RS info about drug addiction in CH. Instead as a compromise I left the first paragraph and suggest to move the rest to health in Switzerland for details. Cheers, Swiss romulus (talk) 06:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit request

You have some typing errors in the second sentence of section 5 (economy). 31.54.65.124 (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Please list in a form your concerns like "modify X -> Y". Thank You.(KIENGIR (talk) 03:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC))

Tourism index

I know CH has very good infrastructure when it comes to tourism. Everything WORKS. Besides personnel is generally well trained and some chefs are graduates from top hosteling Schools (e.g. Lausanne "ecole hoteliere"). Swiss people are generally very hospitable. Cleanliness is also a plus factor for CH. Safety is generally good. All this should be mentioned in the economy section. May be there is a summary Index for tourism (besides the Tourism revenues rankings). On the minus side: cost of living which is already reported in the economy section. Cheers. Swiss romulus (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Minus the fact of racial discrimination of non-Europeans visitors:

32% of the population say they have experienced some form of discrimination or violence in the past 5 years (2021).

On the main table you separated the Christians, but not the nontheists into: 1. atheists, 2. agnostics, 3. indifferent/other nontheist

Be fair. Do the same! See: antiagnostic atheism, because you claim that openness to the possibility of magic is tautological to its rejection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:587:410d:3400:b418:d480:bab5:8a50 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

That data doesn't seem to exist. On the Federal level surveys they just report "No Membership".Tobyc75 (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected?

I notice that this article is semi-protected. Where is the rationale for that protection discussed?

Thanks. 2601:200:104:9F00:580B:8670:2E4F:3AC0 (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Doesn't count as a discussion, but maybe the protection log helps you? User:Samsara (who applied the protection in 2017) is kind of active, but hasn't edited since late June. You may have to wait a while for an answer at their talk page. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 16:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)