Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests
Requests for assessment
Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria(FAQ) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. Please consider entering articles you have improved in the military history article writing contest.
Experienced assessors are encouraged to take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#AutoCheck report for July and check a few of ≈ B-Class assessments. Feel free to downgrade them if you consider they don't meet one or more the criteria. Please also delete any that you have checked. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Assessment, whose articles often overlap with military history topics.
Finnish IV Corps (Continuation War)created from scratch. –Ljleppan (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)- Auto-assessed by MilHistBot as C-class with b1=no. I've since added a few missing references and think it's a B given every non-lede statement has an inline-ref. -Ljleppan (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ljleppan: Assessed by @Gog the Mild: as start with b1=no and b2=no, while I agree with b2=no, I don't see why is b1=no. OakMapping (talk) 20:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Auto-assessed by MilHistBot as C-class with b1=no. I've since added a few missing references and think it's a B given every non-lede statement has an inline-ref. -Ljleppan (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah! I was passing through, noted that coverage was weak, amended b2 and didn't really look at the rest. Can't even remember how I stumbled across it. As B1 was bot assessed and the bot has clearly slipped a cog I have changed it to yes. Apologies for the confusion and for not pausing a little longer over the article. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm happy with the C-class for now and will relist for b2 once I find time to expand this further. -Ljleppan (talk) 11:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah! I was passing through, noted that coverage was weak, amended b2 and didn't really look at the rest. Can't even remember how I stumbled across it. As B1 was bot assessed and the bot has clearly slipped a cog I have changed it to yes. Apologies for the confusion and for not pausing a little longer over the article. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- 1918 protest in Zagreb - please assess for B-class. Thanks--Tomobe03 (talk) 06:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- note: bot assessed as C with an objection regarding referencing, but I cannot determine the cause.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- An error. I have corrected it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- note: bot assessed as C with an objection regarding referencing, but I cannot determine the cause.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cuban Revolutionary Army - Some edits/reorganizing made by some editors, including me. Ominae (talk) 11:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ominae: Start-class. B1=no, there is a lot of stuff without citations. B2=no, there are several engagements listed in the infobox but the body of the article gives no detail on any of these. B3=no, lead is too short. OakMapping (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Battle of Parwan - Many new infos and 2 new sections has been added since the time it was rated C and Stub class in various projects. Disputed about the army strenghts have been introduced, aftermath section has been expanded. Legacy section has been introduced. All with references. Hardly anything is left to be added. --81.213.215.83 (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Battle of the Indus - Was rated C-class. Since then, The background section has been vastly expanded and improved with citations. Battle and aftermath section has also been so. Legacy section has been introduced. Hardly anything addable is left. --81.213.215.83 (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Harry Crerar. Having overhauled Miles Dempsey I now attempt Montgomery's other army commander. If only we had a Canadian version of Zawed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wieger StG-940 - Added some new references and expanded a bit. Ominae (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- 40. Fallschirmjägerbataillon Willi Sänger - Some major rewrites and added citations that are reliable than the one left originally on the wiki page. Can someone check if the infobox data is correct? Ominae (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Massacre of Wassy One of the first articles I heavily reworked about a year ago, forgot to submit it for review Sovietblobfish (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sarandoy - Rewritten most parts of it and gave it a lot of citations. Ominae (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Please also check the military history assessment backlog for articles needing assessment.