Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary Semi-protection: - IP vandalism. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 21:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Only one of these appears to be vandalism, the remainder appear to be attempts (though not nessecarily done well) to update the article. Amortias (T)(C) 21:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Literally just reverted more.BabbaQ (talk) 00:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, see also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#203.145.95.X_harassment,_personal_attack_and_possible_part_of_off_site_canvassing_behaviours. Citobun (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. This is preposterous at this point. This talk page has been unprotected for less than two weeks and there have already been a number of disruptive comments from IP users, ranging from WP:NOTFORUM to grossly offensive. The initial semi-protection from a few weeks ago demonstrably worked, and it should be reimplemented. Curbon7 (talk) 03:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV pushers are back again... sigh. Probably needs permanent semi or pending changes protection, this is a slow moving but perpetual problem. Montanabw(talk) 03:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP edits from Showbiz826, pushing the same image they've been doing for months. Ravensfire (talk) 04:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as protection goes off, the unhelpful anon IP edits begin again... Montanabw(talk) 04:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Kaltenmeyer (talk) 04:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 04:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Reason: Extended-confirmed protection:A presumed sockpuppet of Anshuman Tiwari Official (talk · contribs) hijacked this page to turn it into his pet vanity page. I'd ordinarily ask for a semi, but the presumed sock is autoconfirmed. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 04:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 05:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 05:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 05:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs reverting a well-sourced birthday change. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 05:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by new or unregistered users. Its protection recently expired although it has been protected many times in the past. Snuish (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 06:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 08:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant disruptive IP editing. Citobun (talk) 09:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Reaction to the verdict in the O. J. Simpson criminal trial (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of edit warring by Sundayclose. This user continually keeps reverting edits which have been either sourced or cut down so as not to be excessive, and he accuses others of assuming ownership over the article when he is asked to bring any doubts to the talk page. He has already been issued a warning to avoid breaking the three-revert rule. Jienum (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)