Talk:Duang

Linguistics Start‑class Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Start‑class Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Duang appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that nobody knows what the newly coined Chinese word duang (pictured) means?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duang.

Wikipedia

True definition of Duang?

Jackie Chan says, "一個廣告拍完後加上好多特技，頭髮動啊，很黑，很亮，很柔".

It turns out that Duang actually means "to wobble". "動" means "to move". He was actually describing how vivid his hair was.

--－yhynerson1 (talk, contribs) 12:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. It is clear from what Jackie says, above, that the correct English is "brillig."

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 23:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any source to verify that? Betty (talk) 02:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]