User talk:Pri2000

Pra2310, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pra2310! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anupamaa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please check MOS:TV, as per WP:TVCAST Try to avoid using the section as a repository for further "in-universe" information that belongs in the plot summary; instead, focus on real-world information on the characters and actors and WP:TVPLOT Plot sections should summarize the core storyline(s), but not offer a scene-by-scene sequence of everything that happens Sid95Q (talk) 06:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for this contribution. But I didn't do experiments. Or shared scene by scene summary. Even I understands it to be short. But the things which are necessary should be included. Even in plot and Characteristics of every character. So it's a request please don't revert it again Pra2310 (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

You should be aware about Wikipedia:Edit warring. If someone reverts your edit rather than engaging in an edit war you should start a discussion on Article's talk page. Sid95Q (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

I didn't engaged in war. I just put forwarded my opinion. But the way of my speaking looks like a fight. And I'm sorry for that. Because I always speak that thing which strikes my mind. Thanks for giving me this info. But you're an old user and I came here 3 months back. So you yourself may understand that it's necessary to keep plot updated with necessary events. Even I was the one who requested semi protection to the page due to some anonymous users adding their own cooked up story to plot which didn't had any senses. So please don't revert my edits. Even I edit storyline and cast section when I feel it's necessary. Otherwise I just update episode counts Pra2310 (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have violated the 3RR at Anupama, you are already eligible for block; please take this as a last warning. 180.151.238.61 (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

English

Your edits to Anupamaa contain many errors. You wrote "at last moment", "tries to help Shahs", "Next day", "only to know about house", "shows interest in buying factory's property" and "speaks bitter truth". All of these are missing the word "the". You wrote "They wins", "Paritosh, Pakhi and Vanraj apologizes" and "Anuj and Samar forms". But "They win", "Paritosh, Pakhi and Vanraj apologize" and "Anuj and Samar form" are correct. You wrote "crosses all his line", but "crosses all his lines" is correct. You wrote "Samar-Nandini's world", but "Samar and Nandini's world" is correct. You wrote "Social Media", but "social media" is correct. Please write in correct English. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

thanks for pointing out my mistakes. I'll keep a check on it henceforth. But right now I'll only change episode counts because of warning issued due to my stupidity. And I'm extremely sorry for that behaviour. I won't revert changes now. I'll add recent plot after 1-2 weeks. Pra2310 (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sid95Q (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

thankyou so much Pra2310 (talk) 01:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anupamaa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop restoring awkward English after it has been corrected. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm extremely sorry for my behaviour. And I left message on talk page of show as well as of users also. I just asked don't remove characteristics and at least necessary events and story of parallel leads from show as a show can't run with just protagonist of the show. Parallel leads and negative leads are equally important as they're the pillar characters of the show. And if you don't want to involve them in main plot then add a parallel arc section like many shows. As Samar,Nandini and Kinjal are parallel leads and pillar characters of the show. And also they used before marriage surnames of some female characters instead of after marriage surname. And words like Baa, Bapuji as nicknames. But it's their position in house. Because they are elderly people of family. These words aren't their nicknames. So please consider it and don't revert my edits. It's a humble request. Kindly consider this issue. Pra2310 (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey there

Hello Pra2310,
I understand that you are very passionate about editing Anupamaa and adding plot summaries and fixing stuff as it comes up. While all that is good, I need you to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia – a summary of knowledge. Adding everyday events from the show is not what needs to be done here. For example, check out Balika Vadhu's plot – it is just a mere summary of the 8 years the show ran for.

You do need to understand that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Plot plays a trivial role in the overall encyclopedic value of the article. You should read MOS:PLOT and WP:PLOTSUM to understand and write better plot summaries.

In the message above, I have linked three different policies/guidelines in bold. Could you do us all a favour and give them a read? The way you are currently going, will definitely end up in a block – everyone here is a volunteer and patience runs out eventually. Best wishes! If you do have any further questions, please feel free to reply back here. 2405:201:4013:8128:F569:B633:BD68:D21B (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ok I'll read it. But can you please do me a favour? Can you please assist me in making new wiki articles. On which I'm currently working by collecting info from different mediums. You can see my projects on which I'm working on my user page. And one more thing can we add a parallel story section for parallel leads of story Samar, Nandini and Kinjal as their parts are very important in protagonist's life. Pra2310 (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you should read WP:NACTOR before embarking on the new articles. Articles on actors are created only if the person meets the notability criteria. The guideline states, Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Anagha Bhosale has not had any significant roles outside Anupamaa, while Nidhi Shah has only played significant roles in two other shows - Kartik Purnima & Tu Aashiqui. I really doubt that either of them would qualify for standalone articles. 2405:201:4013:8128:F569:B633:BD68:D21B (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ok. But they both are talented like Anagha's male counterpart in the show, the parallel male lead Paras Kalnawat aka Samar. Both the actresses will reach the criteria soon. Thanks for informing about the same Pra2310 (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

sir you warned me against reverting. But there's a user named Vucein who always revert my edits. He uses words like Baa and Bapuji as nicknames. But they aren't nicknames. And there are many other things. Please review my last changes which I made before his revert and please warn him also against it Pra2310 (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

1) they both are talented Talent is not a criteria for notability here – many talented people do not have articles.

2) Vucien is not wrong here in reverting. We follow a certain set of style in writing known as the Manual of Style or MoS in short. MOS:NICKNAME is part of that guide on how nicknames of people should be written. However, you are correct about the "Baa"/"Baapuji" thing, and I will convey it to them as such.

3) "Love interest" is just an euphemism on "boyfriend"/"girlfriend" and therefore un-encyclopedic – per WP:EUPH such terms should not be used.

4) I would really suggest that you do not go about making anymore reverts while discussions are ongoing. Continuously reverting edits is known as edit warring and will get you blocked. Discussing and reaching a consensus is easy, you can see my talk page here (see the second section) for an example. 2405:201:4013:80F4:1DB:51CC:DE38:6D55 (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Tellychakkar as a source

Hello again,
Please remove the Tellychakkar sources you have added to Anupamaa. Sources must be reliable as per the policy on WP:RS. Tellychakkar is not a reliable source and is even listed as a source that should not be used at WP:ICTFSOURCES. 2405:201:4013:802B:78FF:DB7F:87D5:906C (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Please take this as one final warning

Even after all the effort I put in explaining the errors in your edit to Anupamaa's cast (two sections above), you have gone ahead and re-inserted your text. Please stop your disruptive editing immediately, or you will be blocked from editing. We've assumed good faith and tried to give you more than adequate leeway to understand and work collaboratively, but you continue to act disruptively. 49.36.176.190 (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

see I considered to your warnings. And I saw you warned Vucein too. But they're constantly removing plot to 1 month old track, adding unsourced ratings and many more. So can you please report against them? I tried but failed as they don't have any user page. But it's necessary for them to be warned or blocked for some time due to constant removal of track, adding unsourced ratings etc. It's necessary to keep the track updated. Pra2310 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anupamaa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

please clearly tell about the source which I added. So that I doesn't repeat this mistake again. And please visit the talk page of Anupamaa . I left a message there 2 days back. And please tell me the reason why that thing suddenly happened ( please answer to this question in Anupamaa's talk page not my talk page) Pra2310 (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

The reason the warning was left was this edit - [1], where you added a rating with no source and analysis without a supporting source. Without a source, readers cannot verify that what's in the article is correct. Ravensfire (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok. As you earlier said I can't add Tellychakkar. So now I added it through reputed News Channel ABP News. So is it okay or not??? Pra2310 (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Sudhanshu Pandey article

@Pra2310, the article is at Draft:Sudhanshu Pandey as it's not ready for the main article space. Please improve the article there and work towards it being accepted by a reviewer. Note - I'm leaving you a response here as Talk page without a related article are routinely deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I tried to publish this matter in Draft's talk page but it didn't published claiming this article has been deleted Pra2310 (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Capitalization in Wikipedia

Hey, you've added a lot of short descriptions to articles which is great, but Wikipedia follows normal capitalization rules, while you used capital letters for a lot of those descriptions. For example, you added "Indian Television Series" and it should have been "Indian television series". It would be greatly appreciated if you would go through the articles you've edits and update those descriptions, rather than rely on someone else to do the cleanup. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 13:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

ok Pra2310 (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for making those updates! Ravensfire (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Mythological

Hi, please avoid using the term mythological when applied to a TV show based on religious beliefs as it is not neutral and causes ill will, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok. I'll rectify it Pra2310 (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Anupamaa

Please don't use edit summaries like "Please come on my talk page rather than undoing my edits". Wikipedia's ideal approach is called WP:BRD. You Boldly make a change, but when it's Reverted, you start a Discussion on the article talk page. Discussions about article edits are often best on the article talk page as other editors can find them much easier than on a random person's talk page. The edit-war you were involved in on Anupamaa could have resulted in a block for you (and probably the other editor) as you went past the WP:3RR limit. A similar message will be left on the other editors talk page, but this is about YOUR actions. Continuing to hit the revert button over and over will often lead to a block. Please don't revert quite so much, discuss more. This is a warning about exceeding the three revert limit. Read the WP:3RR page and understand that continuing to edit-war will be reported to the editwar noticeboard. Ravensfire (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

I understand this. But Vucein is complete psycho. I visited his/her talk page. He/She do same thing with everyone's edit just to become extended confirmed user and engage in edit war with everyone. And doesn't come to talk page to resolve this issue Pra2310 (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

You can only control what YOU do. There are standardized warning templates and when you get involved in an edit-war with them, start a discussion on the article talk page (without personalizing the dispute! Remember to focus on the edits, never on the editor) and then leave them a message on their talk page pointing to the article talk page. Especially when they made the initial Bold edit, the onus is on them to work towards consensus. But that takes two people. WP:AVOIDEDITWAR and WP:DR have good advice. If they continue to revert over a period of days, you can go to WP:EWN or WP:ANI but realize that anytime you bring something to the admins, your own actions are also scrutinized. If they go past 3 reverts in a 24 hour period, leave a 3RR warning on their page and if they revert again, go to the EWN. Again, make sure you're doing things right, as you can also end up blocked if you both breach 3 reverts. Ravensfire (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

And your second sentence is a pure personal attack. Please strike it through or remove it. Personalizing a dispute like that does not help anyone. Image if you were the one being described as such. You'd be less likely to work with that person, right? Don't do personal attacks. Ravensfire (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

ok Pra2310 (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pickles. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Shivangi Joshi

Hi, I don't know why you undid my edits. Did you read my edit summary.

1. We don't add wikilink to common occupations like actors per MOS:OL.
2. We only add names of notable parents to the infobox per Personbox documentation.

I have no intention to edit war with you. Hope you yourself will undo your edits. Regards. Eevee01^(talk) 12:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for adding wikilink to profession. But I don't agree with notable parents case. As self made actors specially most of the ITV actors who actually doesn't belong to any background in TV industry and are self-made doesn't have notable parents as you said that one should add notable parents. That means ITV actors' parents doesn't hold any right to be mentioned in wikipedia because they aren't notable. See wiki of almost every ITV actor. Their parents have mention in wikipedia. I'll not add wikilink to profession. But please don't remove any actor's parents mention on the grounds that they aren't notable. Even I'm not interested in any edit war. Because my war with a user who engage in edit war with every other editor, which was purely unintentional lead me to get warning. So please don't remove parents mention. Pra2310 (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

I won't remove it. But this manual of style has nothing to do with someone's background, it applies to everyone. For example in Shraddha Kapoor's infobox (she is from film background) only her father's name is mentioned. Similarly in Deepika Padhukone's infobox (she don't have any film background), only her father's name is mentioned because he is a notable badminton player. You may find parent's name mentioned in other not well maintained wiki article, but you won't find such cases in any well maintained, Good or Features Articles. Eevee01^(talk) 03:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jiya Shankar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

please can you tell me about which edit that I did mistakingly by not adding reference. I'll alter it. Pra2310 (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adding a birthdate without a reference. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ok. I'll not do. That happened by mistake in Jiya Shankar's case. Pra2310 (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rupali Ganguly, you may be blocked from editing. Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Madalsa Sharma.  Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 18:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Pri2000 (talk) 19:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. I'll rectify it to tv series Nazar Pra2310 (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Relatives in infobox

The infobox is for the most important information about a person. Relatives only go there if they are notable themselves (have their own articles). MB 02:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ok. It's the first article which I created. But I've seen many other ITV actors getting mention of their parents in their wikipedia articles even after not being notable personalities. Pri2000 (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

You should see the documentation at Template:Infobox_person/doc that says "Names of parents; include only if they are independently notable or particularly relevant." Also see WP:BLPPRIVACY and all of WP:BLP. Birthdates are not allowed without being widely published in reliable sources. MB 02:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Anagha Bhosale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anagha Bhosale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anagha Bhosale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Princepratap1234 (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

please don't nominate it for deletion. It consumes much time to publish an article Pri2000 (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Pri2000,

Do not move an article that is the middle of an AFD discussion to Draft space. It is disruptive to the discussion. Please participate in the AFD discussion and ask for the page to be moved to Draft space instead. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyrighted images

Hi, you have added copyrighted images to Wikimedia Commons, which is a violation of its policy. I have reverted these in Madalsa Sharma and Rupali Ganguly, using images from Bollywood Hungama, which allows free use of its images. Please do not revert these changes and understand the copyright laws of Wikipedia and Wikimedia. Best regards,  Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 18:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ok. But it was my pure work. And same images are used by multiple sites. And the images which you used specially for Rupali ji are several years old Pri2000 (talk) 19:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

"pure work" only counts if you have taken the photo of the actor on your own camera, not if you have cropped a photo from the internet. And age of a picture does not matter as log as it is correctly sourced.  Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Pri2000, please see WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT. Don't upload copyrighted images otherwise you can be blocked for copyright violation.Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Anagha Bhosale. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ok. But please don't delete it. It consumes much time to publish a single article Pri2000 (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Muskaan Bamne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muskaan Bamne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muskaan Bamne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Princepratap1234 (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of characters in Anupama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of characters in Anupama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in Anupama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234 please don't delete this article. Because cast section of main show only includes relation of every character to principle Characters. Nothing more else. But it contains what kind of a person any character is. So please don't delete this article. Pri2000 (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Pri2000: first of all , using @ is not the right way to ping the user. Use this {{Ping|username}} to ping the user. Now second thing is that please read WP:TVCAST and i have only nominated it for deletion and it will be deleted only after getting consensus on the discussion page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 19:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

please see other shows also. Like Sarabhai v/s Sarabhai where a separate page is present for characters to let people know what kind of people those characters were. Similarly Wagle Ki Duniya it has separate page for episode list. Because sometimes plot summary or just mentioning character's relationship with each other is not enough to let people know which character was what type of person. Please see Anupamaa cast as well as plot carefully. In plot the evil Characters are sometimes shown helpless or bechara in Normal language. And good characters seemed villians. That's why I made this page Pri2000 (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Pri2000: please discuss this on AFD page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Indent

Please WP:INDENT your message on talk pages. you can also check WP:AFDR. Venkat TL (talk) 11:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Overcite on Bipin Rawat

Please read WP:OVERCITE and WP:TOI. Venkat TL (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

@Venkat TL:sorry. I won't do it again. But atleast we can add his major contribution links like "Pehli Goli Bharat Nahin Chalaega" speech and him warning against Biological warfare using Covid 19 by enemies China and Pakistan and challenging both coward enemies for face-to-face battle links to him. Pri2000 (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Pri2000, we don't add everything on Wikipedia unless it's important and notable. See WP:TRIVIA.Princepratap1234 (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

About your edit summaries

You've called me not confirmed and I'm spreading fake news in the edit summary of Sreemoyee. Btw I'm extended confirmed editor, and now I've provided source from Hindustan Times. Probably you aren't Bengali, so you can't read those sources. Also 19 December is after 8 days. As a result I've reverted your edits. Thank you. Happy editing! Shinnosuke15, 17:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

@Shinnosuke15:You're right. I'm not Bengali and can't understand this language because I'm a North Indian. However I read it after translating it using translation tool by Google. There the editor wasn't confirmed. Though HT is a confirmed source don't add ending date till last episode gets broadcast officially on Disney+ Hotstar and Star Jalsha both. I didn't call you not confirmed user. I called the journalist who provided that article on Google not confirmed. Pri2000 (talk) 19:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I have understood. Shinnosuke15, 01:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Is this your account [2] as User page content is same Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

no. I heard this user for the first time. And I'm not someone's sock. Pri2000 (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

I think he/she stalked my user page as the same language is used which I use. But both of us are different. I just update episode counts in YRKKH. As I watch Anupamaa and TMKOC and other Sab TV shows mainly. Rest highlights of other star shows come by as a pop of recommendations by Instagram. Otherwise I'm not interested in Star shows. And one thing the person mentioned his/her religion just like me. So obviously both of us are different. If you find out that user's activity suspicious report her. But not me please. Pri2000 (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

She also copied that she is a science student. I understand that she copied content from your user page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

That's why I said that she stalked my user page . Report that person please. As it'll lead people to think that one of us are each other's sockpuppets. Pri2000 (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

You can't report someone for this. You should tell her on her talk page to not copy content.Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

ok. Thankyou so much Pri2000 (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

This.[3] was actually a sock account.Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234: thankyou so much. I viewed her sockpuppet history. Thanks for warning me against her at right time. Pri2000 (talk) 11:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Archiving and removal

Hey, just wanted to let you know that if your talk page gets too long for comfort, you can choose to archive its contents. Archiving is the preferred method for keeping your space clear, as opposed to deleting sections. However, to be clear, archiving is certainly preferred over deleting but is not mandatory—see WP:REMOVED—you can remove sections if that's what you wish to do. --2405:201:4013:8165:7C06:B1F8:460C:114 (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

thanks. Actually I found those discussions unnecessary that's why I deleted them. Will consider your advice in future Pri2000 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

All were not unnecessary.Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234:but still the talks related to some part was unnecessary. That's why I removed every stuff related to it Pri2000 (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Anupamaaa

Hi dear you have give the reason that " Don't add Sudhanshu Pandey as main lead. Everyone knows that he's negative lead and Gaurav Khanna main lead. Stop being his fangirl. His recent interview revealed how egoistic he himself is that he can't digest himself as villian of show" ... This is Baseless... I'm not being his fangirl at all... And If you are talking about Sir's Latest interview He has Already said that His Character in the show was the hero of the show and he will be.... Before Talking about interviews kindly read them properly. And he has also said that New Characters arrive and depart as they can't show us the same story everytime like earlier Apurva Agnihotri was also a part of Anupamaa PriyaMishra0121 (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

I think you're forgetting that it's the official Hindi remake of popular show Sreemoyee. And Apurva Agnihotri was just meant to fill resort episodes. Not as a love angle for Anupamaa. Here Anuj is none other than Sreemoyee's Rohit Sen and Vanraj Shah is Anindya Sengupta. And you're forgetting that Vanraj's character is a women abuser character who used to insult and mentally harass Anupamaa. Just because makers are giving importance to such a cheap character don't think it's a lead. Even Anupamaa played by Rupali Ganguly doesn't said that she's heroine of the show. So do Gaurav Khanna. And Anuj is a permanent character. Once an actor starts calling himself the hero of show even after being villian his downfall starts. And the person who abuses women can't be a hero. Actually in show both Hero and Heroine is Anupama. But some people shows up their ego by calling themselves hero and defending each and every wrongdoing of their character Pri2000 (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) @Pri2000 and PriyaMishra0121: Both of you need to read WP:TVCAST, WP:PROTAGONIST & WP:NOTFORUM. Terms like "hero", "heroine", "main lead" etc. are unhelpful and to a large extent un-encyclopedic when they are not used by the producers or the soap's credits. Characters and cast evolve with the show; at present both Sudhanshu Pandey and Gaurav Khanna's characters come under the umbrella of 'main' characters and should be listed as such.
  On another note, Pri2000, accusing somebody of fancruft without evidence backing the claim, is a borderline personal attack—please refrain from doing so. Moreover, your feelings about a character and their actions (Just because makers are giving importance to such a cheap character don't think it's a lead.) are not relevant to their status on the show—if the producer credits a character as 'main', they will be listed so, regardless of who they abuse.
  Lastly, this is not a discussion forum or a Fandom—do not express your personal feelings about an actor or the role they play. 2405:201:4013:80E2:A925:81D:9B20:C04 (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@2405:201:4013:80E2:A925:81D:9B20:C04: sir I just tried to make her understand which character is more important. As it's a hindi remake of popular Bengali series Sreemoyee. There Anuj's character is none other than Rohit Sen the love interest and deceased husband of Sreemoyee. While Vanraj Shah is Anindya Sengupta the former husband and father of Sreemoyee's children. There also The sequence is as follows: Sreemoyee(Anupamaa), Rohit(Anuj), Anindya(Vanraj), June(Kavya) and Pratyush (Samar). Makers never said who's main or who's not main. But they often give promos including Anuj and Anupamaa only. Indirectly indicating who is main. And the editor made Vanraj important just on the basis of actor playing Vanraj Shah's character as hero of the show, comparing Anuj's character with the filler character Advait Khanna and over glorifying Himself by saying makers would have cancelled the show on his rejection for the role. If makers would have said the same then it would be okay. But not any other actor claimed the same even after having much important role in the show. Even actress Rupali Ganguly playing Anupamaa, Gaurav Khanna playing Anuj, Paras Kalnawat playing Samar, Anagha Bhosale playing Nandini and even Madalsa Sharma Chakraborty playing Kavya never said the same. I just arranged the order according to original series Sreemoyee as all characters are having similar importance in show Anupamaa as Sreemoyee.

As can be seen from other messages on your talk, you pay little attention to policies and guidelines people point out to you. Let me put this out in bullet points.

1. What happened in Sreemoyee is irrelevant to Anupamaa.
2. Indirectly indicating who is main. I believe you have been pointed to read about our policy on original research before—you cannot assert statements based on the conclusions you draw.
3. Lastly, from WP:TVCAST: The cast listing should be ordered according to the original broadcast credits, with new cast members being added to the end of the list. Articles should reflect the entire history of a series, and as such cast members remain on the list even after their departure from the series. Please keep in mind that though "main" cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits, recurring and guest stars will not necessarily be credited in the same order in each episode in which they appear, so their place in the list should be based on the order of credits in the first episode that they appear.
4. In conclusion, Sudhanshu Pandey's name should appear above that of Gaurav Khanna. 2405:201:4013:80E2:C4A7:37:6C46:C7CC (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Semiprotection

I've semiprotected your talk page for a few days, due to obvious reasons. Ping me if you prefer not, or if it needs extended after the 3 days. I see some worthwhile IPs commenting here, so again, it is fine if you prefer not to have it protected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown: Thankyou so much sir for this help.Pri2000 (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Please don't ignore , you made mess there but I have corrected that SPI , place do it properly next time. Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

actually I filed a case 2 months back against a user Vucein and his sockpuppet IPs. So this is my second case. So I forgot how to file it. Thanks for fixing it. But you shouldn't have involved the actor's article in articles for deletion due to this silly fangirl. As I know her well. Who she's. She does same stupidity on Instagram also. And always misbehaves with everyone. I think one more sock should be added. Her name is Adoring Paras Pri2000 (talk) 20:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

about whom are you thinking about?Princepratap1234 (talk) 20:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

it's a user Adoring Paras present on Instagram with the same name. She also did fan activities 2 months back. You can find her contributions in latest 250 edits Pri2000 (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Then you should add his/her name in SPI. Why did you remove message from talk page without replying.Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

thanks for the advice. Sorry for that mistake Pri2000 (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

will she be called checkuser 1 or checkuser 2 Pri2000 (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

checkuser 1 should be used. If you need any help then you can ping me on my talk page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

thanks for the help Pri2000 (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

That account is used by PR of paras, see [4].Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234: yes I know she's fangirl. She's present as Kiki Paras Kalnawat Love on Instagram. These all 3 accounts are run by her on Instagram also. By the way what's the full form of PR??? Pri2000 (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

PR- Public relation, you should have known this😌. Are you on InstagramPrincepratap1234 (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

so is this her new account??? Actually I doesn't know much about these fangirl terms Pri2000 (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

oh I understood it. Like I changed my username in November due to privacy reasons she tried to make fan account here also. But her request declined. Right??? Thanks for the info Pri2000 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

These are not fan girls terms. Every celebrity has PR team who try to spread positive news about them,Public relations.Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

oh. Thanks. But this girl is nothing more than fangirl. I know her very well. She's egoistic, spoilt brat who misbehaves with everyone and often insults his co-actors for illogical reasons and gives stupid reasons to be paired up with any other actress in the ongoing show. As makers continuously declines her request she personally attacks that actress. Previously Rupali Ganguly who plays his mother and protagonist Anupamaa in the show now Anagha Bhosale who's his real life best friend and portrays his love interest Nandini in the show. And one who tries to make her realise her mistakes she personally trolls that person also. Same she's doing here. Trying to do fangirl activities. So she should be blocked from editing here. Pri2000 (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Don't worry she will be blocked and can we talk on mail if you don't mind.Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

sorry. I don't want to talk on mail right now Pri2000 (talk) 21:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Not now, when you are free.Princepratap1234 (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi

It's done like that as you did here [5], better to install twinkle to do it. Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pri2000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234:I know it's you. You're free to scroll my complete editing history. You know I warned that Tajmashaik also to Remove her content who exactly copied text from my user page. And you can scroll my editing history. I created talk pages of many new users. As I often see editing history of new editors to create their talk page. I didn't knew how that user did vote in favour of keep by copying my text. Please don't accuse me for the thing which I haven't done Pri2000 (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Now admin will decide whether that is your account or not and what do you mean by "That's you"?Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

because I saw it's you who filed it. Even I can file sockpuppet against you as I have proves on my talk page Pri2000 (talk) 09:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Are you threatening me , I can report you for this.Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)