Jump to content

User talk:Ingenuity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusicManiac1950 (talk | contribs) at 20:40, 31 January 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Wgullyn! We're very happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:15, Thursday, March 18, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Wgullyn,

Any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you must post a notice on the talk page of the page creator informing them that a page they created has been tagged for deletion. You did not do this with Jeugdbondsuitgeverij. This isn't that surprising because you are a very new editor and I'm surprised you are already tagging pages for deletion. Please be very careful with this. It is difficult to create a good article so there must be good grounds for deleting one.

I recommend you use WP:TWINKLE because once you have set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator if possible", the program will post these notices for you. If you have any questions, I encourage you to visit the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll do that in the future. Wgullyn (talk) 01:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Phillip Adams (American football)

On 9 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Phillip Adams (American football), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that in this edit to NEXT for AUTISM, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

The Original Barnstar
For fighting vandalism Gandalf the Groovy (talk) 13:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Wgullyn. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 00:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Wgullyn (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure who I’m talking to but I am assuming Wgullyn is included in the discussion. This person arbitrarily deleted edits I made out of honour and respect for a friend who had passed. I posted my own content produced as a well-known researcher and climate scientist that honoured that sadly passed Gettelman’s work. It doesn’t seem to me that Wgullyn should have that latitude. Byrnejames Byrnejames (talk) 00:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

Just cleaning up some of these pages, sincerly apologize. Incredible93 (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for letting me know. I'll remove the warnings from your page; please remember in the future to explain content removal - it looks very much like vandalism if it isn't explained. Wgullyn (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if i revert some of these better edits back with an explanation Incredible93 (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's fine. Wgullyn (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report removed

Can you please explain why you remove my report for Alexyourstepbro? I noticed your edit summary, but this user didn't provide explanation. He was vandalizing a page. Can we communicate about this? Thanks. Severestorm28 19:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that! I meant to just delete the one I had added but I must have selected both lines. Wgullyn (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For helping out with the anti-vandalism efforts. You often beat me to reverting vandalism as well. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...and a cookie!

Cookies!

Melecie has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

you beat me out too! happy editing!  melecie  t - 01:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

January 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm XRENEGADEx. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of insurance companies in India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Hello! I noticed when you reverted User:2402:8100:206A:2CE3:8DF9:43FF:5688:F622, you removed some of their constructive edits as well. Please be careful when using Huggle, as it can remove good edits unintentionally. xRENEGADEx (talk | contribs) 17:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! I didn't realize they had made the constructive edits. Wgullyn (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it was my mistake >.< it was constructive, but as Kuru pointed out, it was a copyvio so he removed + deleted it. You can remove the notice if you feel like it! Again, apologies for the mistaken notice. xRENEGADEx (talk | contribs) 18:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wgullyn, you've only edited 3 articles, so do you have enough experience to say my edits are unconstructive?

Wgullyn, you've only edited 3 articles on your talk, so do you have enough experience to say my edits are unconstructive? Parilla1954 (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited a lot more than 3 articles. If you would like to explain why you think your edits were constructive, please do so. Wgullyn (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Parilla1954: You have only edited 2 articles, so I'm not sure how you can say that to another user -- unless you've edited before? — Czello 15:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Basildon, to update David Amess was murdered in Southend 2021. Are you editing, or critical? Are you in bed with Czello? Maybe a sock puppy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parilla1954 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary for the edit I reverted made it seem like vandalism. Please don't get aggressive or make accusations. Wgullyn (talk) 15:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:EpicUrMomDoer420 and User:EpicUrMomDoer69

I think these two are the same person, FYI. 747pilot (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I figured that. I think they've both been blocked now. Wgullyn (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About a recent warning you gave me

You claimed my edit was unconstructive, yet you seem to know little about the topic of Quebec politics. The 2022 referendum on electoral reform has been canceled. It will not happen. It is not relevant to the 2022 Quebec general election. As such, it needs to be removed from the page. Would you please remove my warning and reinstate my edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.154.79 (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting the section outright, you should create a new section on the talk page and create a consensus before removing the section. Wgullyn (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (talk) 10:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you! Christelhb (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gary B.

I’m not familiar with the system so I’m not sure what’s happening. Why would you remove the link to the video we produced in cooperation with Gary? It’s a very beautiful tribute to him, and after his passing, is a great tribute to his wonderful life’s work. 2604:3D09:2083:1300:6906:47B:D393:855D (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're talking about User:Byrnejames's edit? I reverted that because Vimeo is not a reliable source for Wikipedia (content on that site is often copyright infringement). Wgullyn (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please point to the ruling within Wikipedia guidelines or any other information that says Vimeo videos cannot be included. Byrnejames (talk) 00:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the content on my Vimeo is mine so I am free to share it and you shouldn’t be censoring my sharing’s of my IP. Byrnejames (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vimeo is well known for hosting copyrighted content. See Wikipedia's link guidelines for more information. Plus, if the content is your own, you should not be promoting it on Wikipedia. Wgullyn (talk) 00:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar For You

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For fighting vandalism especially on the Wikipedia Nursing page Gandalf the Groovy (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my edit

I made and edit on video game streaming services that was 100% constructive criticism and it mentioned nothing but truth Plsubnanprog (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't be putting your personal opinion of companies on Wikipedia. If you continue to vandalize, you will be blocked from editing. Wgullyn (talk) 02:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a personal opinion it was the truth Plsubnanprog (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's your opinion. Stop trolling now or you will be reported. Wgullyn (talk) 02:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

section added

Please what I did was revert the edits and my name was all over this odious name and I don’t want to be associated with this edit,please remove my edit of 17 September with my name2A03:2880:32FF:F:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you talk to someone, click the "New section" button. Your IP hasn't made any other edits, I don't know which edit you're talking about. Wgullyn (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Hamburger

Hi My edits were not promotional. I was randomly assigned to this page and was adding citations to magazine articles and also added a citation to the website of the company she worked at. While the second may not be the best place to cite something it was adding a citation to an article that before had only one. Furthermore I did it because in researching I noticed that the mission listed here for En Garde Arts is not correct. I intend to add my changes back in because I think that adding citations is objectively good and also that this having an incorrect mission listed for the company is a problem. But I will wait for a while to allow us to try to develop a consensus around that. If you can find another source for the currently unsourced mission statement that I'm saying is incorrect then I'd be fine with leaving it but otherwise I do think it should be corrected. KNY22 (talk) 02:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KNY22 Good day. What you added is considered promotion especially in the lead section as it should be about the subject. The existing lead is written in neutral point of view and it should be. Cassiopeia talk 02:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to why you aren't acknowledging that there were factual errors on this page that I was getting rid of. It seems like it would be good to get rid of those and then deal with a tone problem if there is indeed one with what I wrote rather than keep an unsourced inaccurate statement? Also there is only one section to this article (unless you mean paragraphs in which case I'd be happy to put things in a different paragraph). If the issue with what I wrote is with the sentences around the mission I propose "En Garde Arts creates site specific theatre experiences and includes non-arts partners in the creative process in order to foster dialogue." If you have an objection to the sentence about the awards I thought that was notable and was also including it as a way to cite the time out article which I thought was a good citation to add but I don't mind citing the article for a different reason or if you both prefer taking that out all together. However the mission is currently misstated and needs to be changed. KNY22 (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@KNY22 sorry for reverting that edit. After looking at it again, I thought you were the one who added the "serial cultural entrepreneur" line. I've reverted my edit. Sorry about that! I've also removed my warning from your talk page. Wgullyn (talk) 04:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I appreciate that. KNY22 (talk) 04:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thankyou for nominating the article on Max Zumstein for deletion. This is going to be a huge task to sort through the articles we have on non-medaling Olympians and fiture out which ones might meet other inclusion criteria and which ones do not. It does not help that the articles when made were almost all made as purely Olympian stubs, even for people who had significant levels of other competition appearances.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Su-35 China section

Hello Admin.

I removed the false news from Indian media. This false news was later debunked by creditable source. Therefore, it has no value at all.

--2601:242:C001:2A20:94D9:5868:A27A:EA72 (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! First, I'm not an administrator. When you removed the content, you failed to provide a source. If you can give a source for your claim, I'll reinstate your edits. Wgullyn (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Please see the source.

Indian Social Media Goes Nuts Over Fake Claim of Su-35 Shootdown

--2601:242:C001:2A20:94D9:5868:A27A:EA72 (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll revert my edit now. Wgullyn (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome sir.

I already reverted it.

--2601:242:C001:2A20:94D9:5868:A27A:EA72 (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TheKringeGaming

Hello, Wgullyn,

You tagged this page for deletion ONE MINUTE after it was created. This is not acceptable in Draft space unless there is content that violates copyright or is a BLP violation. Please give editors much more time to develop an article before considering it for deletion, at least for drafts.

In fact, it is much more important to tag inappropriate pages for deletion in main space, where readers might see them, than in Draft space, where they won't. I would encourage you to spend your time patrolling article space rather than Draft space. Please consider that content creators can spend hours, weeks and even months developing and improving their articles and give them a break. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I tagged that because the person creating the article is clearly the owner of the channel. Searching up the channel's name shows it only has around 50 subscribers - clearly not notable. Wgullyn (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Draft:Mæy Käh

Hello, Wgullyn,

i think this page shoudln't be deleted because mæy käh does indeed dox as shown here: https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sras60 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom-cartoon (talk • contribs) 03:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tom-cartoon: attack pages are not allowed on Wikipedia, regardless of what the subject might, or might not, have done. If you do anything like this again, you will be reported to administrators. Wgullyn (talk) 03:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New section

Hello Wgullyn, You mentioned in my article to contact you directly on your talk page to discuss. Your comment was that although the topic was notable at this time, now the format was incorrect. You are correct, I manually added the logo text box. I was in help chat and several people could not help with finding the correct template for the this company. If I understand your notes, I have now done the secondary sources correctly, and am only lacking proper format of the box with business logo. If I delete the box completely, is that possible for approved submission? Get this out there and let people who have more experience edit the page? Here is the page. Thank you for your feedback. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Friendly_Folk_Records — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicManiac1950 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MusicManiac1950: I fixed some of the formatting on that page and added an infobox (I think that is what you were trying to do?) Before you resubmit the page, I would suggest removing some of the external links - most Wikipedia pages shouldn't have too many of them. Cheers! Wgullyn (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for fixing the format and adding the correct infobox. I had contributed to many articles over the years as an anonymous person, just because it made me nuts if I saw incorrect information. This creating an article turned out to be a lot of work. I never realized how much work went into this process. It gave me a newfound respect for the people in the Wikipedia world. I will remove some of the external links. There were so many to choose from. Thanks for the tip, and again thank you for all your help. Cheers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ingenuity&oldid=1069143824"