Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microchip Is The Mark Of The Beast Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. There is no reasonable prospect of this being kept. BD2412 T 00:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Microchip Is The Mark Of The Beast Theory

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly translated and poorly sourced. Also: Moulatsiotis in one of his interviews in 1995 said that "In the future, a mark will be most likely made, it will be a chip, a biometric ID or a scanner in the forehead". [5] Judging from what Moulatsiotis said his predictions were probably right.. Really? Guy (help! - typo?) 07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

weak KeepWhilst its badly written its a "rel" theory that has been around since god knows when.Slatersteven (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]].Slatersteven (talk) 09:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The section Number of the beast#The mark of the beast and microchips contains a better summary of the subject. While the subject is noteworthy, there is nothing worth keeping or merging in this article, and the title is not worth keeping as a redirect to that section. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What monks proclaim when they are preaching is a matter of faith, not fact. The Three Secrets of Fátima are a matter of faith, not fact. That other monks have got hold of this and propagated this is a matter of opinion, rumour and gossip from the aforesaid so-called sources. This article does not have WP:NPOV and proceeds to make claims upon claims. Article is pedalling a point of view based on nonsense. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Indiscriminate entry about New World Order conspiracy theory culture and a WP:POVFORK. —Paleo Neonate – 11:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Number of the Beast covers this subject referenced reasonably well. Probably no reason to keep a redirect for the clumsiness of the title. --intelati^talk 14:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: We already have a perfectly good coverage at Number of the beast#The mark of the beast and microchips. This is just a poor-quality POV fork of that. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor-quality POV fork, as argued above. XOR'easter (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV fork of Number of the beast#The mark of the beast and microchips that suggests via WP:OR that the whole idea started in Greece. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Piling on, there's nothing worth merging or saving in this POV fork, even if notability were established it would be TNT-worthy. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above comments. --- FULBERT (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.