Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Red Bulls II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep anyone? (NAC) SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New York Red Bulls II

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the WP:FOOTYN guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per nom. Not notable. DES ^(talk) 18:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @Ukexpat: and @DESiegel: - team plays in the United Soccer League as fully professional, national league per WP:FPL. The team, despite being a reserve team, clearly meets WP:FOOTYN as having competed in a national competition. Fenix down (talk) 18:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 19:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 19:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sport-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 19:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets notability standards as a fully professional team in a league listed at WP:FPL. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:FPL only actually applies to players not teams, however, they pass Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability#Club notability. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I meant that comment more to illustrate that they don't just play in any old league. Fenix down (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Fenix down it plays in the United Soccer League which is a WP:FPL league and passes WP:FOOTYN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NYRB II are a USL team. Clearly meets WP:FOOTYN. – Michael (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as relevant as any of the other teams in USL '''tAD''' (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - The club obviously meets WP:FOOTYN, as do all U.S. clubs in the USL, NASL, and MLS due to their automatic entry into the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 14:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 14:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - clearly notable given the league in which they play. Giant Snowman 20:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.