Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:44, 20 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 15:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism[edit]

User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 15:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While this could be considered a sandbox, it's also possibly an old draft from August 2006 that is seemingly covered now by List of non-state terrorist incidents. There's a list of source but no idea what they are for and otherwise the proposed structure of each year having a page such as 1995 in terrorism seems to have been resolved instead with pages titled List of terrorist incidents, 1995. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Acceptable userspace notes page. Not a draft. I corrected the tag, replacing the incorrect tag added by Binksternet 10:54, 13 December 2014‎. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Notes for what? It's a series of links to a possible structure for terrorism articles that was never used. And I have no idea why you'd call it a user page. There's literally no mention of any user. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • There is an answer to every sentence you wrote, but none would seem to lead towards discovering a reason for deletion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. Not worked on since 2006; no need to keep this indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9   17:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Decade-old stale draft.  — Scott talk 18:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.