User talk:Medvegja

Pargali Ibrahim Pasha

The sources clearly say he was Greek. Removing them isn't going to help you. In fact it can be considered vandalism. If you do this again I will report you. Athenean (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Tenet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 16:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 21:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Malsori Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dajç and Bojana

Darragjat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bojana

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maligrad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm WhiteWriter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mamuša because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! you must present some new sources, and you must not delete the sources. WhiteWriter^speaks 18:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Can you just tell me where did you saw there results? I cannot find in on this page you placed as reference... --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians

Your recent editing history at Albanians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Albanians

You are reverting to an edit where you've provided no edit summary or explanation, and changed cited content without discussion. Open a talk page discussion and explain what you are doing and why and wait for consensus agreement. DeCausa (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Albanians. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 21:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on Balkan-related articles

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

It'd be prudent to use the talkpage and the mentioning of your sources more often and also: më qetë.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 22:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported

Here [1]. Athenean (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have noted at WP:AE that you never reply to comments left here on your talk page. The fact that you are not interested in discussions or in reaching agreement with other editors may lead to sanctions against you under WP:ARBMAC. The admins at AE are considering banning you from Albanian topics. It might be in your best interest to respond to the complaints at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Medvegja. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your advice.

Topic ban

Per this, you are now indefinitely topic banned from all articles and discussions pertaining to Albania, broadly construed. If you have a question as to whether something violates your ban, feel free to ask me and I'll respond as soon as I can. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."