Jump to content

Talk:Reddit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a04:241e:901:f200:2035:8cfb:772e:5b5c (talk) at 19:08, 31 March 2022 (→‎Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Austin.Lira.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tortalyni.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2020

In section "Controversies", "2020":

  • Original text, for context:

On August 3, 2020, moderators of the subreddit r/Animemes banned usage of the word 'trap' to refer to any person or fictional character. The ban was predicated on the real-world usage of the word "trap" as a slur against transgender people, with moderators citing the trans panic defence. In response, many users of the subreddit contended that 'trap' was not being used in a non-transphobic manner, but instead to endearingly refer to crossdressers, otokonoko, and characters with related identities in animanga.

  • Please change the last sentence to:

In response, many users of the subreddit contended that 'trap' was not being used in a transphobic manner, but instead to endearingly refer to crossdressers, otokonoko, and characters with related identities in animanga. 189.10.216.68 (talk) 00:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneIVORK Talk 00:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reddit 2010 and 2014April Fools prank missing

For some reason I can't edit the article myself, but anyone who can should add the 2010 April Fools prank.

"Reddit’s first massive April fool’s social experiment was to make everyone on site an admin. For 24 hours users could ban one another, modify upvotes and delete comments and votes. This was all, of course, fake. Any modifications to reddit only occurred through the user’s perspective. While many caught on, others began threatening fellow users with their admin privileges and went on mini power trips demonstrating that not everyone can be trusted with great power."[1]

In 2014, Reddit did "headdit" a joke way to navigate and use the website using the webcam.[2]

Bigfreakingkelleher (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can edit the article for you, but ok Chris Ducker (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2021

At this article's first mention of "Steve Huffman" the article should link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Huffman 208.65.167.243 (talk) 16:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Done - The first mention of Steve Huffman is in the lede, and it's already linked. The relevant sentence is Reddit was founded by University of Virginia roommates Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian, with Aaron Swartz, in 2005.The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 16:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, going to accept your request Chris Ducker (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity about Aimee Challenor

As a reader, I am confused by this section under the 2021 controversies. As it reads now it seems like the backlash was against her solely for the actions of her father and boyfriend. Reading the linked articles it appears that she kept her father on as campaign manager after charges were filed. Not entirely sure how to word that. perhaps "In March, Reddit users discovered that Aimee Challenor, an English politician who had been suspended from two UK political parties for retaining her father as her campaign manager after his child sexual abuse charge and partner's comments related to pedophilia, was hired as an administrator for the site." That doesn't really sound right though. What are your thoughts?--76.123.193.174 (talk) 05:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support a rewording and your version, while not ideal, is already clearer than the present state of the section. My suggestion would be "In March, Reddit users discovered that Aimee Challenor, an English politician who had been suspended from two UK political parties, was hired as an administrator for the site. Her first suspension from the Green Party came for retaining her father as her campaign manager after his arrest on child sexual abuse charges. She was later suspended from the Liberal Democrats after tweets describing pedophilic fantasies were discovered on her partner's Twitter account." That way we have a more in-depth description of why she was suspended and which incidents are tied to which suspension. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nsfw content

there's isn't enough talk of the nsfw content on the site and the regulations for it Cyclone26 (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since that appears to be something you're familiar with, maybe you could add it?ImaginesTigers (talkcontribs) 00:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"similar sites"

4chan and Tumblr are not similar sites to Reddit. Lemmy is.

Saying that 4chan/Tumblr are like Reddit is like saying 4chan is like an airplane because it travels very quickly or Tumblr is is like a roll of toilet paper because you can keep scrolling down on both. They are not good comparisons, and they're not justified in the same way comparisons to voat, digg, and hackernews are.

User:Mir Novov what's your justification? Would you say that The New York Times is a similar website to Reddit, since they both show the news? Or Pornhub is similar to Reddit because they both allow their users to upload pornography? I can't understand why you lump Tumblr and 4chan in with Reddit besides "these are popular international websites for English speakers" . I am not trying to be malicious by reverting your edit, I am simply trying to keep the page on point.

153 [x] 00:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Lemmy since it goes against criterion #13 of WP:ELNO, but forgot to put that in the edit summary; sorry about that. There are (probably literally) hundreds of Reddit alternatives out there; all of them have just as much of a right to be included, and if they all were, then the section would be unnavigable. If you wish for it to be included in the list, create an article about it with reliable sources that prove its notability.
Both Tumblr and 4chan are general-purpose content sharing sites with a discussion component. Them and Reddit are based around an anonymous user base with a unique culture, and especially in the earlier part of last decade, shared numerous cultural ties. - Novov T C 02:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible improvements

Hello! So I have 2 things that I think could be improved on in the same sentence. The sentence is, "Posts are organized by subject into user-created boards called "communities" or "subreddits", which cover a variety of topics such as news, politics, religion, science, movies, video games, music, books, sports, fitness, cooking, pets, and image-sharing." First, where are the user-created boards called communities on the website? From my limited knowledge and being on the website I've only ever seen them referred to as "subreddits". Second, "which cover a variety of topics such as news, politics, religion,..." this should probably be shortened to something like "which cover a variety of topics such as news, politics, religion, and more" or possibly "such as new, politics, religion, etc." I don't really see the need to basically list all of the topics the subreddits cover as there are a whole lot of them. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Animemes

"On August 3, moderators of the subreddit r/Animemes banned usage of the word "trap" to refer to any person or fictional character. The ban was predicated on the real-world usage of the word "trap" as a slur against transgender people, with moderators citing the trans panic defense. In response, many users of the subreddit contended that "trap" was not being used in a transphobic manner, but instead to endearingly refer to cross-dressers, otokonoko, and characters with related identities in animanga. Many users flooded the subreddit with memes making fun of the rule change and the moderation team. Many left in protest, which resulted in a loss of over 100,000 subscribers."

the sources: https://nicchiban.nichegamer.com/2020/08/subreddit-r-animemes-bans-trap-loses-almost-100k-subscribers-in-two-weeks/, https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/08/12/trap-banned-reddit-anime/

Drama specific to a subreddit, in this case r/animemes, is not relevant to the larger topic (being Reddit itself). In addition, I would not consider hitc or nicchiban reliable sources, even on anime topics. For these reasons I'm removing this paragraph from the article altogether unless it can be shown to affect the website as a whole.

SpartaN (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

R/GenderCritical Ban directs to a TERF site

I'm not sure that it's necessarily a good idea to link to a TERF site while citing the ban of r/gendercritical, as it risks compromising the neutral point of view for the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by FloofMother (talkcontribs) 19:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FloofMother: Can you explain what link you're referring to? ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link number 327 — Preceding unsigned comment added by FloofMother (talkcontribs) 19:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FloofMother: I think it should be fine as long as the content the reference is supporting is neutral. However I don't know what would be acceptable in this situation as I tend to stay away from political related things (TERF sites being one of the many things). You might be able to ask at WP:RSN about the source however I've heard that places is only for discussing the reliability of a source and not whether it would be appropriate in certain situations. So I would say wait for a more knowledgeable editor to answer. (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.)Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updated citation for academic studies on the "Science" section

Hello, I am the owner of the blog someone has cited discussing academic research on Reddit. I believe a better source would be this academic journal article: Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics of which I am one of the authors. It gives a much better up to date and in-depth coverage of the quantity of Reddit research, what disciplines are doing it, what topics have been covered, and methods used.

I an new to contributing to Wikipedia, but I have not edited anything myself as I believe it would be a conflict of interest/go against Wikipedia's values.

Throwaway Nay (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Throwaway Nay: Hello Throwaway! Thank you for not editing the article directly as you are correct that you would have a conflict of interest. SOme advice for you would be WP:COI and WP:SELFCITE. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some subreddits have sites!

Well, I've found one: https://okbrofficial.neocities.org/ , https://okbrofficial.neocities.org/home.html https://okbrofficial.neocities.org/articles.html - important links to understand what this community about. There were also sites with other communities from Reddit. Should they be added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.98.48 (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New intro, please

Could someone please rewrite what this is, in the first sentences. I have worked in computers for years, and used them for decades, and I don't even know what is being said, much less basic computer users.... Misty MH (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This might help:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/web/what-is-reddit/
Misty MH (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2022

I wanna fix some mistakes i found 2001:569:502D:8B00:1024:6E70:7F8A:2BD5 (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2022

Johnnysins696969 (talk) 13:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Can I edit this page Im a master of reddit im 56 year old and 312 pounds and I want to discride more about reddit[reply]

Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022

is an British social network located in London