Talk:Libs of TikTok

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hat speech and public blaming

2604:3D08:357F:7A00:D11D:794A:8F10:89D8 (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Not clear what changes you want made, though I can imagine. --Pokelova (talk) 19:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Useful Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can someone please set all refs URLs to 'live' - did this but edit failed as article was protected while I was editing. Cheers. --70.113.252.165 (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Pokelova (talk) 19:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) , (ip changed but same editor)--69.107.153.172 (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

I don't have a dog in this fight, and simply came here for more information, but this article is horrifically biased. Wikipedia is supposed to be an unbiased source of information. This article very clearly has a strong slant against the subject of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2c1:8200:620:e118:c627:b6aa:166a (talk • contribs)

What parts of the article are biased? X-Editor (talk) 19:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really? The entire article reads from a very clear left-wing perspective. Just about every line in the content section of the article is extremely biased. About the only line from a right-wing perspective mentions how they are outraged she was doxxed. And after reading the rest of the rest of the article, that line gives the impression that conservatives are just being whiny babies. This article could very well have been written for any left-wing website. Here's an exercise... imagine this article on a left-wing site and imagine an article about Libs of Tiktok written on a right-wing site and how different it would read. Now throw both out and start over without a clear bias from either side. Gamezero05 talk 19:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)\[reply]

If you want to add the right-wing perspective, go ahead, nobody is stopping you. X-Editor (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to add the right wing perspective. I want to remove the left-wing perspective and make it neutral. Gamezero05 talk 19:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the left-wing perspective does not make the article neutral, it would only make the article biased against the left, which is the opposite of neutral. X-Editor (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense. This article is filled with left-wing bias. Not right-wing bias. The only bias to remove is left-wing bias. In doing so would make the article neutral. Presenting different viewpoints is fine as long as it's made clear that these are the opinions of a particular group. But this article as a whole in the way it is written is completely biased when it should be neutral. Gamezero05 talk 21:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Presenting different viewpoints is fine as long as it's made clear that these are the opinions of a particular group." That's exactly what I was suggesting. Fix the article if you think it is biased. X-Editor (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You did not fix the article or add any new perspective, you just resorting to whitewashing the subject. X-Editor (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamezero05: If you think there are specific neutrality problems with the article, go to WP:NPOVN. X-Editor (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be cleaned up big-time. Gamezero05 talk 19:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The whole page is Leftist transgender and covid mandate propaganda. It's not neutral. WP has became a political ground for modern western leftists. All cats are british (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@All cats are british: If you think there are specific neutrality problems with the article, go to WP:NPOVN. X-Editor (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender and covid mandate propaganda are not neutral. All cats are british (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@All cats are british: Did you not read what I posted above? X-Editor (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You say "nobody is stopping you" and then undoing their edits? You are the one who is stopping. All cats are british (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The reference to the "Don't Say Gay" bill should be changed to the "Parental Rights in Education" bill. There is no bill by the name listed in the current version and it smacks of bias. VerticalEarth (talk) 20:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. X-Editor (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't say gay bill

Wikipedia, in order to stay neutral, should call the parent's rights in education bill by it's proper name, instead of calling it the don't say gay bill. Or if you do call it the don't say gay bill, say that that is what critics call it. for example, say the parent's rights in education bill, which critics call the "don't say gay bill". 100.16.159.129 (talk) 20:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.16.159.129 (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC) 100.16.159.129 (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. X-Editor (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serious BLP violations in this entire article

The entire purpose of this article seems to be about naming the person behind Libs of TikTok. seeing as the creator isn't a noteworthy or newsworthy personality, I think that it is a serious violation of Wiki:BLP and should be considered for deletion immediately. PeaceThruPramana26 (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to nominate the article for deletion if you feel like it violates our policies. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What part of the BLP does the article violate? X-Editor (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:PUBLICFIGURE, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:BLPSTYLE, WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPNAME and given the current overreliance on source 2, WP:PRIMARY Nameomcnameface (talk) 22:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's literally just defamation and left propaganda (transgender and covid mandates-based ideologies). It's not a notable account at all, just a tiktok Repost account. WP is an encyclopedia. All cats are british (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social media site. All cats are british (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is full of defamation and propaganda. It's all against Wikipedia's purpose. All cats are british (talk) 22:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]