This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Japanese Mythology infobox
Just as a question.. why was the infobox changed back to Japanese mythology? Even though the idea of mythology isn't inheirantly an offensive phrase, it's still pretty strange that infoboxes such as the one on christianity aren't called christian mythology because people object to it being branded "myth". 213.40.67.6500:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Because it's part of the Japanese mythology WikiProject, and because the infobox covers not just Japanese religion, but also Japanese folklore. And so far, no one has objected. If you feel the name needs to be changed, it's best to raise the issue on the infobox talk page or (better yet) at WP:Jmyth or WP:Japan. -- Amcaja01:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Okiagari-koboshi, was selected for DYK!
Hi Brian. I saw your DYK entry, Tourism in Cameroon, and I'd like to complement you on it - it certainly might reach good article status at the state it is in. I've got three questions:
On a whim, I expanded Waza National Park, but Google doesn't turn up very many reliable looking (read: non-blog, non-advertising) potential sources. Do you think any of the sources you used would be able to help it out?
In the notes section, you list page 174 alone and pages 174-175. Would it be proper to merge those into one ref?
Thanks for the compliments! I'm trying to get Cameroon up to FA status, which involves some work on redlinks in the article. Tourism in Cameroon was one of those. To answer your questions:
Yes, I do have enough to expand Waza National Park by at least a little more. I'll take a look at it sometime in the next week or so to see what I can do. Good job on finding the sources you did online and not resorting to unreliable blogs and the like as a lot of others might have done.
The reason I did the 174–5 thing is because the bit being referenced is a summarative statement covered by material on both of those pages. The references to page 174 and 175 individually are on those pages alone. So, in the interests of verifiability, it's probably best to leave the pages referenced separately where possible.
No, that is near the village Rhumsiki, southwest of Waza. I really should write up that village; it's a major tourist draw in Cameroon. — Amcaja06:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Alright, thanks. I saw a reference to "Rumsiki" without the h, and it seemed to suggest it was quite near - maybe in - the park. For the record, ghits for the spelling without the "h" are higher, being 15,000 to 1,000. However, Rumsiki has no incoming links, while Rhumsiki has several, so I'm not sure what the better page title would be. Picaroon18:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, and to complicate things, there are also Rhoumsiki and Roumsiki. I'll try to check a few maps and go with what the published consensus seems to be (as opposed to the blogs and things you mentioned earlier). — Amcaja22:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Igbo people
Brian, at [1] you say you are going to keep reverting till they provide a source, but the number that you are reverting to is unsourced and seems to me to be wildly high; the other might be a tad low, but seems much more likely; I'd have thought 25-35 million (and, no, I don't have a source). You might want to look & see if there is any basis for the number you are defending; I suspect that there is not. - Jmabel | Talk06:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out. I've tried to find a citation to put an end to the constant changing of that article's population statistic. See Talk:Igbo people and see what you think. — Amcaja10:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Images and headings
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your change moving the images below the section headings. The manuals of style says (at WP:MOS#Images) to be sure to place the images above the section headings so that they don't cut the title off from the text. --Sopoforic00:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. This flies against all common sense and all my experience on Wikipedia, so I've posted a question about it. Seems more useful to have all section headings left-aligned rather than allowing images to bump some of them over. — Amcaja02:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Beaufort beer label.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beaufort beer label.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot05:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Tourism in Cameroon, was selected for DYK!
Hi, RobNS. I've removed your edits to Cameroon regarding its military pending a source citation. I'm currently trying to get the article up to Featured Article status, and to that end, unsourced information cannot be present. Can you provide a source? Thanks, — — Amcaja (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Brian, no problem. Actually, all I did was transfer some of the information from the Military of Cameroon page into the Cameroon main page, since it didn't have a wikilink to a Cameroon military page. I didn't actually add or change any of the information. --RobNS23:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Location Maps
On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries. New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps. As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries. Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design. Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option. There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman7 Feb2007 20:05 (UTC)
I'm sending a photographer to the Annie Awards this Sunday, on behalf of Wikinews. I'm giving the photographer a sheet of people to lookout for, including John Lasseter, Bill Plympton, Genndy Tartakovsky, Andreas Deja, and a bunch of voice actors. Anyone on the nominee list that you ID as being really important to get a pic of? -- Zanimum22:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello Brian - I have watched your minstrel show article and it has shaped up very nicely. Many kudos! It has occurred to me that Prof. Irwin Corey ('the world's foremost authority') is a nearly perfect example of the "stump speech" interlocutor still extant among comedians today and that he could be included as such an example in the legacy section of the article. However, since it is simply a personal observation (although a thoroughly grounded one, having seen him in performance numerous times, and since I worked with him on a video in NYC during the late 1990s) I have hesitated to edit this into the article myself because you seem very concerned that such an observation be accompanied by a citation. So, I have decided to simply offer this up as a humble, but friendly suggestion.Wlashley23:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. The "Legacy" section of minstrel show is already quite long, I think, so it might be more noteworthy to mention Corey in the article stump speech (minstrelsy). However, you're right; it would be nice to have a source citation to back up the connection. Let me know if you find such such a source; I'll look myself once my attention returns to minstrel show (currently it's on Cameroon). Thanks again for your help. — Amcaja (talk) 22:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations
Congrats on the Atangana article reaching FA status ! I am still stuck with the Fon , Fon of Bafut and Achirimbi II articles. Not getting time to visit the University libraries for the Ritzenthaler books. Also could not make time to visit the Smithsonian to see the documentary about the festivals of Cameroon. Will get around to expanding the articles one day. Till then, congratulations on a job well done ! ray08:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Ray! It is tough to find time to do the research for Wikipedia sometimes, isn't it? I really enjoy it though; writing articles helps me to synthesize the information I might otherwise just forget if I simply read about things. Keep up the good work on your end; perhaps we'll find ourselves collaborating sometime. — Amcaja (talk) 22:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
From me too; I saw this on the front page and figured it must be you. Nice work! I'm constantly impressed by your dedication. So are you still in Japan? How's life? I'm back to teaching here in SE Asia... good times, good times... --Dvyost11:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, long time, right? Thanks for the congrats; that's funny you could tell it was me without having to check the history . . . :) Yup, still in Japan, and loving it for the most part. What country are you in? — Amcaja (talk) 22:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
In Thailand, but working with Burmese refugees. Good times, good times. Next stop--back to school for the Ph.D.! Take good care of yourself out there... --Dvyost13:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, yes. A lot of my American friends who lived in Anglophone Cameroon tried to learn Pidgin, but some people refused to ever speak it with them. It's certainly stigmatized by the educational establishment. A related phenomenon is Camfranglais or Frananglais, a modern pidgin. This BBC News story talks about its precarious status. Perhaps I should write an article . . . . — Amcaja (talk) 01:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Brian. I've always thought that the two terms refer to the same thing. Also, i think they (it is) are spoken in other countries such as Côte d'Ivoire. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ®11:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello Brian, I have a little volume of Dibdin's Sea songs 'A New Edition' (words only) published by HG Clarke & Co (66, Old Bailey) and Hayward and Adam (Paternoster Row) 1846, prefaced by a Memoir (no named author). As I haven't got the big edition with the tunes in I don't know if this is the same memoir as that one, but this gives the birthdate as 15 March 1745, which is not quite the same as in the Wiki article (saw your note). I presume the other is from Encyclopedia Britannica? I have an interest in Dibdin as I sing some of his songs. Not sure how to verify this information. Should I add it as a footnote or something? Also I'd like to slightly enlarge references to his roles and songs etc. Any advice gratefully received! Best wishes, Dr Steven Plunkett04:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Steven. Unfortunately, my knowledge of Dibdin is pretty shallow; I came to his page due to Dibdin's association with early blackfaceminstrelsy, and that's about the extent of what I know about him. As for his birthday, the date currently given in the article has no source provided and is listed with a question mark. If you have a source that provides a different date, by all means, please change the date and start a "References" section to list your source. Add a footnote to show where you got the information. In short, sourced information trumps unsourced information. If someone wishes to dispute your changes, the footnote can be expanded to denote the fact that sources disagree on the exact date of birth. Best, — Amcaja (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, South Cameroon Plateau, was selected for DYK!
MWHS has been inactive for months. I think it's safe to replace the page wholesale when you do. - ∅ (∅), 13:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. Thanks for the heads up. I've put the article on the back burner for now, but I do intend to return to it. I'll go section-by-section, as I agreed in the mediation, but I'm sure we'll find out if they're really watching it or not. — Amcaja (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
"Duh"?
So it's obvious that it's a screen capture. However, can you say that it could not have been taken from a web site that made the screen capture? It doesn't even begin to qualify as a "duh". - A Link to the Past(talk)02:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant "duh", as in "Why didn't I supply the source when I uploaded it?" It was directed at me, not you. — Amcaja (talk) 04:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I wasn't "vandalising" wikipedia I was adding info - this has completely ruined my thoughts of wikipedia. I'm not a "Vandal" and I won't be using Wiki again.
I'm not sure what you're referring to, since the only two contributions from your IP address are to my talk page. Can you point to a specific edit or set of edits that were labeled vandalism? — Amcaja (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Brian, Thanks for your contribution and effort to help us bring Compsognathus to FA status. They were very much appreciated (at least by me). Just a note: could you add a bold "support" next to your struck "Oppose" so that Raul could see it when reviewing FAC. Thanks again. ArthurWeasley17:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I also wanted to say thank you for reviewing the article, Brian. Your comments and contributions have certainly improved the article. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester17:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
You have been invited to join the WikiProject Africa,
a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Africa. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!
My edit which you marked rv was not vandalism. I only deleted duplicate text. I do not think it makes any sense to repeat whole lines verbatim in the summary, so I kept only what I thought were the most important statements in the summary. --KarlFrei15:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Rather than removing lines completely, then, it would make more sense to rephrase them. The summary is supposed to be just that, a summary, and should duplicate information from the main article. — Amcaja (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Definite article in DRC
Can I ask your help with something? I noticed you are a member of WikiProject Central Africa. Should articles on DRC include the word "The" in their title? I'm thinking of National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and others which have recently been moved. Personally I think yes they should, as this is what english speakers normally say (despite the general ban on articles in wikipedia). Could you let me know what you think by commenting at Talk:Democratic Republic of the Congo. Many thanks!! AndrewRT(Talk) 21:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Cameroon
Just translated French Cameroun. Actually, I have some sources somewhere that details lots better the colonial war with the UPC (the French article was a bit of an apology of colonialism...) Lapaz00:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Why was my edit reverted? The band are well established as a screamo band. Hardcore is a wider term than necessary to describe them, and punk is just wrong, really. Plus they are referenced as a screamo band on the emo (music) page. I queried this on the talk page, but it received no response, so I figured I'd ask you directly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Proctor (talk • contribs) 00:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC).
Hey I Am trying to create a Three Kingdoms Portal Do You Think You Could Help Me Out?
Winn3317 01:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
That sounds like a really good idea. Unfortunately, I'm pretty swamped in real life and on Wikipedia at the moment, so I don't think I can do much to help. Maybe post a note at Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms and at the Chinese history project? — Amcaja (talk) 02:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
please cut back on the reverting
please do not revert; discuss the things you are unhappy about first.
Any reason why you keep removing the Kokopelli / Trivia reference to a music festival, with the name and logo of kokopelli?
Agreed, initially I added a link to their website and you might think of it as "linkspam", but when I added the info again (this time without the link to their website), you deleted it again.
What's the difference between an Arizona pizza company's logo featuring kokopelli (including website link), and an music festival logo (even without website link).
Sorry, you're right. The pizzaria trivia item was linkspam as well. I've removed it. Thanks for the heads up. The other two "trivia" items should probably be cut as well, but because they are about people with Wikipedia articles of their own, I'm going to leave them be for the moment. Should the music festival you mention ever get its own Wikipedia article, the trivia blurb is more likely to be pertinent. — Amcaja (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Washi
Hi - I enjoyed your pic of millet beer in Cameroon, then noticed you are now in Japan & evidently have an interest in traditional life. *If* you happen to pass by the workshop of a maker of Japanese handmade paper (Washi) and can take some pics of the papermaking process (which is very interesting), it would be a great addition to the rather thin Washi page. I will have a go at the text as I have good access to books on the subject, but I can't get to Japan for real life pics. Thanks! Mark Nesbitt07:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Requesting Permission to Publish Photo. Hello Brian [name withheld for privacy reasons], Thomson Learning would like to publish the photo "A bush taxi gets stuck while trying to pass a stalled logging truck on the road between Abong-Mbang and Lomié, East Province, Cameroon." in a Sociology textbook. Did you personally take the photograph? If not, can you tell me where you found the image? If it is your photograph, can I obtain your permission to publish the image with a signed permission release form? <email address removed> -Thanks, Jill
Brian - I see you've removed my mention of the cereal shapes that can be found in the Lucky Charms cereal. Can you explain why you removed the entire entry? Would it be reasonable to at least include a description of the cereal pieces? Thanks. 76.173.233.3221:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, that would be fine. What I was more concerned about was the symbology being mentioned. We need a source to back up any assertions that the cereal shapes are supposed to convey Christian messages (per our policy concerning original research). Feel free to reinstate what you feel relevant. — Amcaja (talk) 22:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
about Donkey Kong(witten in Japanese)
If you can't read my Japanese, please take your message into my note.