User talk:ALLBN

Welcome!

Hello, ALLBN, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:ALLBN/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jalen Folf (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to publish the Conservation CATalyst page I have been working on but can not do so...please help. Thank you! ALLBN (talk) 18:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)ALLBN[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ALLBN/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:ALLBN/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you would block me??? I have made one page for a group that was deleted by Orangemike. I worked with him to understand why it was deleted and he reverted the deletion so I could correct it, but before I could I was blocked???? I understand that some of the language was a bit biased that I took from their website however I also had dozens of independent sources and was trying to be impartial. Why dont you help people improve instead of bulling them? ALLBN (talk) 21:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry Deb, I am feeling very frustrated... I was trying to do a good thing, make pages for nonprofit organizations I want to know more about. There is a steep learning curve with Wikipedia and I have felt very bullied while I am trying to do my best. I read your FAQ page and it explained a lot. I had no idea I could label my page "under construction", that is exactly what I wanted to do. Is it possible to be unblocked and have my original page undeleted so I may put it "under construction" while I try to improve it. It is frustrating to spend so much time on something and have it deleted in a second. I welcome your contributions and advice for us novices. thank you ALLBN (talk) 22:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC) ALLBN[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ALLBN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I understand that some of my language was biased however I was not intentionally promoting, and once it was pointed out I tried to fix it (but could not because I was blocked), I will not do it again, and try my best to make productive contributions instead ALLBN (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Procedural accept; block was already lifted. Yamla (talk) 10:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ALLBN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I understand that some of my language was biased however I was not intentionally promoting, and once it was pointed out I tried to fix it (but could not because I was blocked), I will not do it again, and try my best to make productive contributions instead ALLBN (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I was a little hasty in blocking. I failed to recognise that you were still in discussion with User:Orangemike. Please follow his advice. Deb (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deb- I can not follow Orangemike's advice because you also deleted the page when you blocked me. I have never been able to revise the mistakes I made on this (my first) page because as soon as it was published it was deleted and as soon as it was reverted back it was deleted again and I was blocked! Could you please revert back my page so I may amend this and please label it under construction so this does not happen immediately after again. Thank you! ALLBN (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)ALLBN[reply]

Never mind, I thought it was faster to remake the page. It is underconstruction. ALLBN (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)ALLBN[reply]

Draft:Conservation CATalyst

Moved to draft and will start improving. Cheers, CompassOwl (talk to me!) 17:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!!! : ) ALLBN (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC) ALLBN[reply]

I am not sure where the page went to? Do you mind publishing it if you think it is OK? Thanks again for all of your help and guidance!!! Much appreciated! ALLBN (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)ALLBN[reply]

October 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Conservation CATalyst, from its old location at User:ALLBN/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I am trying to tag Conservation CATalyst with "woman scientist" "conservation" etc. to help expedite the approval process but it will not allow me to? Any advice or assistance is greatly appreciated. One of my goals for 2020 was to build my first WIki page and I am hoping to accomplish it.

(@Nathan2055:)

Thanks again!!! ALLBN (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC)ALLBN[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conservation CATalyst (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also see WP:BOMBARD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conservation CATalyst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Conservation CATalyst, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ALLBN! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conservation CATalyst

Hello, ALLBN. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conservation CATalyst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Conservation CATalyst

Hello, ALLBN. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Conservation CATalyst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]