Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Roe (talk | contribs) at 16:55, 18 June 2022 (→‎User:Moondragon21: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled

User:Harushiga

I have created over 25 articles, none of which have been removed nor tagged. I'm planning on creating more, so having this right would hopefully lessen the backlog of reviewers. Harushiga (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles look clean. Good work, Harushiga. Can you explain, though, what this was about? Schwede66 01:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this was for my edit in Draft:Alice and Therese's Illusion Factory. I didn't reply to it because I wasn't sure if I even violated anything. I never copied anything verbatim, but I guess my paraphrasing of the article I cited was still close to the original for it to be a copyvio. Can't verify it since the edit history got hidden, and I already forgot how I wrote it. Harushiga (talk) 03:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the swift reply, Harushiga. The issue was with this source:

  • Draft: Tadashi Hiramatsu serving as the assistant director
  • Source: Tadashi Hiramatsu is serving as the assistant director
  • Draft: Yuriko Ishii designing the characters and serving as chief animation director
  • Source: Yuriko Ishii ... designing the characters and serving as chief animation director

The other source listed has since been archived:

  • Draft: Masaru Yokoyama composing the music
  • Source: Masaru Yokoyama ... composing the music

That looks rather close, doesn't it? Schwede66 04:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, nevermind what I said; it was a valid copyvio after all. I believe this is only a single occurrence, because getting the talk page message still made me more cautious, and I've since made sure to actually paraphrase information from the sources I use, at least with the articles I wrote. Harushiga (talk) 04:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I've run a few of your latest creations through Earwig and they were all clean. I thus assume that you've learned from it. I've assigned autopatrolled for 3 months and watchlisted your talk page; make sure that no copyvio complaints turn up during that time! Once the three months are up, put another request through and ping me. If you stay clean, we can then make it permanent. Schwede66 09:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Itcouldbepossible

I have created around 50 articles. I am requesting autopatrolled rights so that new page reviewers doesn't have to spend time to review my pages. It would make their job a little easy, and they would be able to review other articles, which are actually needed. The NPR always has a huge backlog. Itcouldbepossible Talk 15:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since 45 of those were created in the last two weeks and were mostly quickly-reviewed stubs,  Not done for now. Thank you for thinking of the NPP backlog but we need to see a quite significantly longer track record. Also, unless you're only interested in creating stubs, we need to see long articles that show you're familiar with our content policies. – Joe (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot Joe for reviewing my request. Possibly you are right in thinking that I shouldn't have autopatrolled rights at this moment, but just to add, I have developed quite a few drafts extensively, and also a few articles. Some of them are Nayantara (TV series), Harano Sur (TV series) and Gaatchora. If you are talking about creating big articles, then I mostly focus on bengali TV shows, which you might already know from my user page. Those recent stub creations were create articles on the species of some things that which I had read about recently. I am currently being mentored by FormalDude, and you can see the mentorship here and here. I had requested for this right because if I go for creating stub like articles (though not all) in the future again, I don't have to contribute the NPR backlog again. If you have seen my talk page archive, then only once an issue was raised regarding one of my creations, that too a minor one, which is solved now. Would you suggest me when and after meeting what criteria I can reapply again, and the request would get accepted. Thanks again for you kind explanation. Sincerely, Itcouldbepossible Talk 11:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Itcouldbepossible, like I said, it's a question of time. Autopatrolled is only useful for editors that regularly create new articles and only safe to give to editors whose creations we can be sure don't need review. You've created a good number of articles, but almost all of them are copy-and-paste stubs created on a single day. Which is fine – but it gives me no an indication of whether you will be a prolific creator in the long term or whether your future creations on different topics are likely to need review. If you want something concrete: wait six months and reapply if you're still creating articles regularly and haven't encountered any problems with them. – Joe (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DIVINE

I mostly create article related to Nepalese politicians and Nepalese people. I'm quite confused about the length as i have to be honest here that most of my articles are stub when i create them and i contribute only by getting more information. If i am not qualified not a worry as i'll keep contributing by just thought thought to apply it as it will surely help not to create more backlog. Regards, DIVINE 📪 20:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for volunteering, but since several of your articles have been deleted, I think they'd benefit from continued review.  Not done. – Joe (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moondragon21

Prolific new article writer (about 2177 new entries). Have looked through contributions and found few issues. Schierbecker (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... tough one. On the one hand, there are a lot of notifications about deletion nominations and draftifications on their talk page. On the other, very few of these seem to have stuck. Extending AGF, we could assume that the high number of articles they've created is magnifying the normal 'error rate' (on their part and on reviewers'). I've checked their more recent creations and don't see any issues myself. This user also a legitimately "prolific" article creator so granting autopatrolled is going to help the NPP backlog. So on balance,  Done. Thanks for the suggestion. – Joe (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PopePompus

I've created 29 articles about Astronomy and my home state of Iowa. None have been deleted. I plan to create quite a few more Astronomy-related articles, and since I'm quite familiar with the notability requirements as well as the layout of such articles, I don't think they need to be patrolled. PopePompus (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:KHR FolkMyth

User created 26 clean articles about folktales, most of them through AfC. As the topic is mostly not a hot one like bios or politics, I think the autopatrol right can be given (there are thousands of articles at AfC). Please note that I've no connection to the editor, though I accepted several KHR's articles at AfC. Artem.G (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nardog

I want to stop contributing to the NPP backlog and having to wait for weeks to see my articles show up in search engine results. Nardog (talk) 23:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thank you. – Joe (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Silence of Järvenpää

Used created 27 clean articles on music. Please note that I've no connection to the editor. Artem.G (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]