Jump to content

Talk:Oscar Isaac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pictureperfect2 (talk | contribs) at 08:23, 28 June 2022 (Proceed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleOscar Isaac is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted

Citation for His Ancetsry

cmon Israeli thats unlikely —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.241.66 (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life section

Personal Life section could be added. I don't know the specific rules for inclusion but I think it's weighed on notability and I think he has passed it in my view, as of late he's gotten quite "big".

Also not just this section but expanding the others with "fluff". --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 01:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lets try to avoid any gossip column material though. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Informal peer review

I will be look through this article per a request on my talk page. My comments are below:

No archived link available for either of these, unfortunately. I've replaced them with one image from 2012.
That is a shame, but the replacement image looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For this part, including Baltimore, New Orleans and Miami, I would unlink Miami if not Baltimore and New Orleans are not getting linked as well. It is not consistent and I would believe a majority of readers would already have some level of familiarity with Miami.
  • I have a clarification question about this part, as he said one does not worry about having to make them likeable. There is nothing wrong with it, but I'd imagine that an actor would still want to make even a villain engaging to an audience. I know that is not the same as making them likeable, but I am curious if he goes into audience expectation for villains more? This is not necessarily to add to the article (as it would put too much weight on this one part), but I'm genuinely curious.
As I understand, he thought it would allow him to explore his character's further sides, which I've incorporated there.
  • I have a clarification question about this part, he initially considered himself unfit for the part. How did he see himself as unfit for either Poe Dameron or a part in Star Wars in general?
Added whatever else there was in the source. He feared he wouldn't make the character interesting and asked why him and not someone else.
  • I have a question about this part, To avoid "green screen alien space land". Is this quote in response to his work on Star Wars or is this a more general statement?
The source does not specify, but I believe the "alien" part refers to X-Men since he was not satisfied with the film, but he could just as well mean Star Wars for the whole part.
  • I have a question about this part, the film tells the story of a noble family who become ensnared in a war for the desert planet Arrakis. I have not seen Dune (and to be blunt, I have no desire to do so), but I have read the novel a while back. Does the film present this as a "war"? I am only asking because that is not how I remember it being represented in the book.
I've tweaked it slightly to remove "war". While certain sources use this, others don't. I have only seen the first twenty minutes of the film so I can't personally judge it.
  • In this part, $399 million against a budget of 165 million, the $ sign should be on both numbers. I'd make sure that is consistent throughout the article.
  • Has Isaac ever received any pushback or criticism for playing "a wide range of nationalities"?
If anything, he has been praised for it. I know normally, something like this receives criticism, but I believe it's because he was able to escape being pigeonholed into the roles of lowlifes, drug lords and hot-headed Latino, which is sadly very common for Hispanic actors in Hollywood.
  • Are the 2010 reports about him having a wife incorrect? If so, why is that notable enough to mention here? I'd get it if multiple article incorrectly said he was married, but if it was only one publication, it seems rather trivial to me.
I think I read this in other reports but I don't remember if it was their own report or if they were all merely basing their assumption on this report. I will look further into it.

I hope that my comments are helpful. I will read through the article again later this week or likely over the weekend. I have honestly only seen Oscar Isaac in Star Wars, and while I found him to be likable, I was largely disappointed in the sequel trilogy. I only mention this to say that I am coming at this from very much an outsider's point of view. As I have told you before, I do highly respect you for working on articles about very popular/famous celebrities who are still very much in the midst of their careers. That is a difficult thing to do well and that deserves respect. Have a great week! Aoba47 (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Aoba. These are definitely helpful. I have addressed these, and look forward to your reread. Getting recognized for my work from fellow Wikipedians, especially those whose contributions I admire so much, means a lot. The main reason I take on the articles of popular actors/singers is they are visited by millions of readers every year so it’s important for these to have the best quality possible. I do intend to expand articles of underrated artists in the future though.
I’ve watched Isaac mostly in indie films and I find him to be underrated at times, but I’m happy he’s slowly getting his due recognition. If you're ever in the mood for a slow crime drama, watch A Most Violent Year. Other good performances include Ex-Machina (though this one is more Alicia Vikander's film) and Inside Llewyn Davis. He truly shines in these small-scale films. FrB.TG (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the kind words and I will definitely watch some of these in the future. I look forward to re-reading the article in the near future. He is definitely getting more and more recognition and I'd imagine that his career will only continue grow as Moon Knight become integrated in the MCU and when the Metal Gear Solid film is released, though I'm more so looking forward to watching him in more scaled back films. Aoba47 (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For this part, he worked as an orderly at the hospital his father worked at, I could see a link for orderly being useful for readers who are not super familiar with the concept. For instance, I've heard of it before, but I could not really give you a definition of it.
  • I have a question about this sentence: Instead, he studied performing arts at Miami Dade College and continued to act in plays. Did Isaac graduate from Miami Dade College and if so, what degree did he get? When I Googled this, I saw some sites report that he received an associate degree from the college.
He did graduate but like with Julliard, I didn't find any mention of a degree. Was the source you found by chance a reliable one, which says he received an associate degree?
  • I am not familiar with performing arts schools, like Juilliard School, aside from just knowing that they exist and are highly respected. However, when I read this sentence, Isaac graduated from Juilliard in 2005, I did wonder what kind of degree he received from this graduation. Is this known?
The official website mentions him as one of their graduates but unfortunately, I found no reliable source, which has info on his degree. Many (unreliable) websites say he received a bachelor's degree though.
  • For this parenthetical, who played the title role, I would use Robin Hood instead of title role because it is separated enough from the film's title that I had to look back to make sure who this character is in this context.
  • I am uncertain if this is notable enough for this article, but when Scenes from a Marriage was released, most of the coverage I saw about it was about Isaac's full frontal nudity in it. Just curious if that is notable enough to mention here?
Oh, good it's about his nude scene. When I started reading this sentence, I thought you were going to ask about the mention of Isaac smelling Jessica Chastain's armpit because that went quite viral. :D Anyway, I've mentioned his full frontal nude scene.
  • Not to get stuck on the Star Wars casting bit, but I have a question about this sentence: Isaac doubted if he would make the character interesting. Could you clarify what is meant by this? To me, it reads more like he had a negative attitude about the character and how he just did not find him interesting, but I am guessing that is not what is meant.
I didn't know if I could make it interesting", "I don't know why me and not anybody else". From these two sentences, I gather he doubted his ability to make it interesting as in not the character was dull or anything but rather he thought that it was out of his depth. I've changed my sentence to "Isaac doubted if his performance would make the character interesting". Hopefully, it clarifies it.

I believe that is everything. Wonderful work with the article. My comments above are pretty nitpick-y, and I am looking to seeing this in the FAC space in the future. Have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Aoba. You too have a great weekend. FrB.TG (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the Filmography section?

It would make a lot of sense to add a filmography section for him.Barnacles14 (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since we have the article List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac, a filmography section isn’t needed here. FrB.TG (talk) 20:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed

Seeing that Aoba and another user are some of the few users on this page not sure how to remedy the following: Edits on here are not correct or factual at times. Additionally the volume of material is more than is necessary however if the editing was done to a higher standard that wouldn't matter as there are other articles with the same circumstances. The only solution seems to be discussing the edits that are a problem and also the methods being used... Please stop reverting so as to make future editors have to reverse more than ONE edit to accomplish anything. Manual reverts are a hassle, obviously.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you fully know how punctuation works and make no grammar mistakes in your edits, you won’t be reverted. FrB.TG (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not your personal project. You are not on Wikipedia to fix what you see as tiny punctuation errors. The edits I question have nothing to do with commas or punctuation. You make wrong edits. I will show you the ones to which I am referring.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You left out the words "he was" and that is something you have likely done before. You can't omit words which are essential to proper grammar.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's optional to use "he was" in "While (he was) an infant". They both mean the same thing. When you can write something with fewer words, you do that. As for your punctuation mistakes, this isn't the first time you've made them. I've already explained in details to you why the commas need to be placed and I already pointed out your grammatical error in my revert. The fact that I still have to explain this to you shows just how stubborn your approach is. FrB.TG (talk) 21:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing stubborn about it. You could go to a large percentage of the pages on here, maybe more than 80 percent and your style if you want to call it that would be questioned. You and maybe three others are adding material here and no media outlet would ever publish something in the style you choose.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 00:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Funnily enough, it was you who changed to "while an infant". At least, stand by your own changes before criticizing "my" style. FrB.TG (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was because I was making another edit and it was simpler to fix in that fashion.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of efforts to reach consensus here has been noted.Pictureperfect2 (talk) 08:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]