This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. A year ago, a strong consensus was established that "Company + App name" is a valid form of natural disambiguation, even when the company names is not part of the app name. That said, I would have opposed the move had it not been for the fact that there are Google Wallet and Microsoft Wallet. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A) There is no publicly available usage data for Apple Wallet passes, thus distinguishing a select few of them as "common" either shows a bias or is an assumption that cannot be proven.
B) There are thousands of businesses that integrate with Apple Wallet. Either all of them must be listed or none of them. If you wish to track the former, it should go on a separate page. Tytygh55 (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are inventing reasons for undoing my contributions. As I mentioned in your user talk page, neither “unnecessary section” (your first attempt) not “lacks citations” (your second attempt) are valid reasons for removing other user’s contributions. In fact your undos are against Wikipedia editing guidelines.
> Either all of them must be listed or none of them.