User talk:Sammyrayy

This is Sammyrayy's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everybody Wants to be Poppy (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources provided are reliable. See the notability criteria for songs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everybody Wants to be Poppy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Everybody Wants to be Poppy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notsammyray! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Notsammyray, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Snackmurat. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Titanic Sinclair have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Snackmurat (talk) 05:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic Sinclair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Titanic Sinclair while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jazmin Bean have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jazmin Bean was changed by Notsammyray (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-12-14T15:57:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anti-icon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anti-icon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i was working on an article with this image, but did not finish. please, when i reupload, allow it. Notsammyray (talk) 02:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to R.E.M. (song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article LG Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Instagram is not an acceptable independent source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 00:43, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notsammyray,

I have removed the PROD tag due to your objections on the article talk page. PRODs are supposed to be uncontroversial deletions and any editor can remove a PROD tag from a tagged article or file. Please realize that this might result in a nomination at AFD for this article so it is worth your time trying to respond to criticism of the article and work on improving the article.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kate Bush (album)

The article Kate Bush (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM. MusicBrainz and Discogs are not acceptable or reliable sources. KateBush collectables is a primary source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LG Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LG Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LG records

I did in fact give multiple reasons, the first of which is that your changes are unsourced and totally unsupported by any reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at LG Rblx, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not move this article or restore the content again - it is straight up vandalism at this point as it appears to be nothing more than a hoax given that there are absolutely no sources anywhere to be found, reliable or otherwise about "LG Rblx" PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at LG Records. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 21:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the evidence of self-promotion, I have extended this block to an indefinite one. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not self-promotion??? I am not associated with this label at all, I am just a fan. I really like editing Wikipedia and I have some really helpful edits I'm waiting to make on notable subjects. In the future, I will provide much more reliable sources. LG does exist, however I see now how it's not notable. Here is a link to prove that it was real and I didn't make it up: https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/label/lg-records-8/download-streaming-albums/2997877 Notsammyray (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please I understand why I am being blocked, but I'm just trying to help please please don't make it indefinite. Notsammyray (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A good place to start would be to explain this edit summary in more detail. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They announced this change in an in-game Roblox event. Here is the message they posted on Discord: https://imgur.com/a/4uE4Pmr

If you don't believe me you can join it here https://discord.gg/SaVDVpJm

They also announced it via Instagram on the tenth slide of this post https://www.instagram.com/p/Cg0KKyyoEg5/

I'm really not trying to vandalize anything, i was only trying to help Notsammyray (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notsammyray,

I noticed that I earlier posted a message to your talk page when your article was PROD'd so I thought I'd respond to your comments. To be unblocked, you'll need to file an unblock request as stated in the block message. But before doing so, you must move on from LG Records and accept that the community has decided that they don't want an article on this subject. If you persist and try to create it again, you will just be reblocked.

Think about those other article subjects you want to contribute to and mention a fwe in your unblock request. Most of all, the admin reviewing your unblock request wants to see that you will not create similar articles and you are commited to being a productive contributor who will learn more about Wikipedia's guidelines, policies and standards and abide by them. They want to be convinced that they will not have to monitor you or reblock you.

If this is too much work for you, well, there are plenty of other websites online that you can contribute to and hang out at besides this project. If you want to edit Wikipedia though, you need to make a persuasive unblock request that convinces the reviewer that any problems you have are in the past. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My concern stems from the fact that one of the sources provided at the now-deleted article was an Instagram account that is presumably yours. That, coupled with your claim that you are in direct contact with the alleged founder of this company (real or not), suggests a conflict of interest. I feel that taking Liz's advice above would be the best approach here. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of LG Records

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page LG Records has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sammyrayy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked because I added a subject that was not notable with little sources and evidence that it existed. From now on, I will provide several reliable sources on all edits I make and I will NOT add any content in which there could be a possible conflict of interest. I understand my mistake and it will not happen again moving forward. I have made some valuable edits in the past, especially on music subjects and I will continue to do so if I regain access to Wikipedia. I would be very grateful to continue being a user here, as I truly respect the project and have never intended harm on it. Notsammyray (talk) 07:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the exact, specific nature of your conflict of interest, does not convince me you'll leave LG Records alone, and does not generally come across as convincing. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question

Hey, how did you know Angry was released through DistroKid may I ask? Is there a possible way of seeing that for every song? 213.238.185.46 (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]