Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl/Archive 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 06:58, 2 January 2023 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:Qwerfjkl) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archive 15Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 25

Tech News: 2022-46

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Great baths (disambiguation)

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Great baths (disambiguation) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Baths (disambiguation)

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Great Baths (disambiguation) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Citizens through descent categories deletion question

Hi, I saw that you closed the discussion Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_6#Category:Citizens_through_descent as merge per proposal – the proposal being for "citizens of X by descent" categories to be merged to "people with acquired X citizenship" categories – despite there being:

  • 1 !oppose, as the result would be confusing. A comment against this from the proposer acknowledged that there are two 'categories' of people included in the category to be merged and a better solution could be discussed.
  • 1 !merge per proposal, and
  • 1 !merge to a different set of categories, as the commenter noted that more articles in the category were "citizens of X nationality born abroad" than those who later acquired citizenship

I agree with the first and last !votes, and perhaps the category should have been split so that there will be less confusion in sorting the articles, but in any case, three contrasting !votes is not a consensus at all, and I don't believe this discussion should have been closed. I am here to encourage you to reverse the merges and relist the discussion, rather than taking this to the more laborious WP:DELREV. Kingsif (talk) 23:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

@Kingsif, I agree this should be relisted. I didn't notice the second merge !vote mentioned different merge targets. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
@Kingsif,  Reverted and relisted. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
@Qwerfjkl: Ah, thanks! Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

DabCatter

DabCatter is working well but I found one minor issue: the page may get deleted between compiling the list and editing the page. I think the only cases are Great Baths (disambiguation) and Great baths (disambiguation). Can you check the page still exists immediately before editing it? Certes (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

@Certes, sure, I just didn't think any would get deleted. I could also check if it's already tagged with {{R to disambiguation page}}. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
We're now down from about 1300 to 27 untagged redirects: quarry:query/68885. The ones I checked are now. Would another run pick these up, or shall I edit them manually? Certes (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
@Certes, I've added the exists() check, and I've run it on those pages. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Qwerfjkl,

Did you intend to tag this category page for deletion? You closed a CFD with this category as a merge but the other category has not been created yet. Please do not just close the discussions but also handle the follow through on what should happen with the categories involved in the discussions. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liz,
As with § CFD categories, I've listed the category on the WT:CFDW page. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #547

Tech News: 2022-47

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/34 (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 16:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Qwerfjkl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! gobonobo + c 16:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Question from Ameer al safar (08:17, 22 November 2022)

Hi Mentor, When I recently created a film article, I found the producer Sandip Senan and director Tharun Moorty don't have a Wikipedia article, when I check to create Sandip Senan, I found there are some warnings about previous deletions. Could you check and advise me regarding this? Do I need to try it or avoid creating it ? awaiting your response. --Ameer al safar (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

@Ameer al safar, it appears the page was moved to draftspace because it was not ready for mainspace, at Draft:Sandip Senan, and then deleted because that draft was abandoned (CSD G13). You can request it be restored at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13. — Qwerfjkltalk 13:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
@user:Qwerfjkl Hey, just got it recovered, could you check? Only the filmography section I can add, some rest details are there, could you give me an advise that do I need to work on it or not? Because now I have doubt that the topic is eligible or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameer al safar (talkcontribs) 07:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
@Ameer al safar, it could be notable under either WP:FILMMAKER or WP:GNG. The subject seems to have produced a lot of notable films, so they might be notable. — Qwerfjkltalk 07:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok will collect more details as I can. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameer al safar (talkcontribs) 07:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Eton college categories

You closed the CFD Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 14#Eton College categories in accordance with the unanimous opinion. Thank you. Sadly the outcome is unreasonable. For example the bot upmerged the category at John Moyer Heathcote[5] which had the effect of removing the article from the Category:English barristers tree because Category:Barristers educated at Eton College was a subcategory of that also (see archive) and so the English barrister category was not required directly in the article. This seems likely to be a general problem. I have corrected only two cases. What should be done? Thincat (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

  • The creation and populating was done by Rathfelder quite recently at his usual breakneck speed. (People educated at Eton are of all nationalities, so the inclusion was wrong anyway.) Would it be possible to undo the edit made by Rathfelder to populate the category? Most of the Eton categories will be OK but I agree that barristers will not necessarily be in another 'barristers' category. Clergy too perhaps. (This said, an upmerge to 'English barristers' (or British would be better) would be correct most of the time.) Oculi (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #548

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

Tech News: 2022-48

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #23

20:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Question from Ameer al safar (07:58, 30 November 2022)

Dear Mentor, I have created a bio article Sreejith Sarang, he is one of the well-known editors in India. could you check and advise me on anything else I should improve? The article has a deletion history 3 years back. But I believe that he is eligible with his current portfolio. I have added a stub temp too, as the article lacks some information. Please check and give me a concise advice. --Ameer al safar (talk) 07:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

@Ameer al safar, it was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreejith Sarang as failing WP:GNG. You need to make sure there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". — Qwerfjkltalk 09:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amadea (yacht)

Information icon Hello, Qwerfjkl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amadea (yacht), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded TheresNoTime
removed TheresNoTime

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Question from Akashbajwa111 (19:58, 2 December 2022)

Does Wikipedia pay? --Akashbajwa111 (talk) 19:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

@Akashbajwa111, pay editors? No, see WP:VOLUNTEER. — Qwerfjkltalk 21:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)