Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of the Assumption Parish Primary School (Cheltenham)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:54, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:54, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per csd/article creator req. Killiondude (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Our Lady of the Assumption Parish Primary School (Cheltenham)[edit]
- Our Lady of the Assumption Parish Primary School (Cheltenham) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not badly written article about school that is not notable. Most elementary schools aren't. References are almost all from pov, non-WP:RS sources. Wikipedia is not an almanac. Student7 (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cheltenham, Victoria#Education, as per previous outcomes for primary school AfDs. This does not meet the guidelines for a stand-alone article, but it is mentioned in Cheltenham, Victoria#Education, so a redirect or merge to there would not be innapropriate. Quasihuman | Talk 15:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Independant reliable sources cited ~ notability. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 20:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Move to Delete per stated above ~ due to myself being the predominant author of the article, CSD G7 (Author requests deletion, or author blanked) applies. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 05:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect per OUTCOMES. The Mark of the Beast (talk)`
- Delete for failure to satisfy WP:ORG, the relevant notability guideline. Needs nontrivial and significant coverage. Coverage from the school's publications or the organization controlling it lack independence. Trivial coverage, or attention only from local media is insufficient. Edison (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.