Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Abdur Rahman Madani (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Abdur Rahman Madani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion tag removed. Sources provided do not support notability. The 2 Muslim aid references are passing mentions and dont support the claims made,2 "about" sources support information but not notability, and the BBC source is a passing mention only. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC Flat Out let's discuss it 00:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Paucity of independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails GNG. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 02:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It honestly should have been speedy but if the template was removed, I guess AFD is the only option. Clearly not notable at all and the "citations" are just grasping for straws. Seems like fanboyism, actually. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Snow, this late in Spring?! --Randykitty (talk) 09:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong and speedy delete - abjectly fails WP:BIO guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Nomination. OccultZone (Talk) 15:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The new sources that meet WP:RS only mention him in passing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.