Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faiz Syed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Faiz Syed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now that the self-published refs are gone we're left with a non-notable person who is associated with several non-notable organizations. The author was a sock master undertaking multiple paid-edits. for (;;) (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks significant notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As it turns out, what Caroline A. Murphy wrote up is the biography of someone who thinks transgendered people are defective and dirty, and that men should be allowed more than one wife (cause it alleviates poverty?). I'm not yet ready to say this person is not notable--he's not notable as a scholar, but he may well pass the GNG based on his preaching persona. Weak keep. Oh, I defluffed the article some. Murphy (or the puppet) was a notoriously bad writer of promotional fluff; the article could do with some help. Drmies (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please Delete per nomination and be done with this drivel. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing actually convincing for his own notability, SwisterTwister talk 19:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Evidence of notability not apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.