Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 4

< April 3	April 5 >

April 4

File:Pac-12 Women's Basketball Tournament logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from List of Pac-12 Conference champions ★ Bigr Tex 18:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo currently being used in Pac-12 Conference Women's Basketball Tournament and List of Pac-12 Conference champions. Usage in the main article about the tournament was lacking the separate, specific non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c so I added the rationale since it appears this is still the logo being used according to pac-12.com/womens-basketball/womens-basketball-tournament. Usage in the list article does have a non-free use rationale, but I don't think it satisfies WP:NFCC#8 (per WP:NFLISTS) and so it should be removed. The seems to logo be for the tournaments held in Seattle, which started in 2012. The tournament format itself started in 2002 (according to the main article), rbut the list includes conference champions as far back as 1987 so the logo does not represent the first 15 to 16 years of the tournaments existence. Suggest keep for "Pac-12 Conference Women's Basketball Tournament" and remove from "List of Pac-12 Conference champions". -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image is used with the consent of the Pac-12 and Stat Broadcast. Furthermore the Pac-12 has asked that the logo be used for all articles referring to the tournament in Seattle. Failure to do so would mean that ALL logos should be deleted on Wiki. Bigddan11 (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not require the consent of the copyright holder for the use of non-free content, which is why it is treated as non-free. WP:NFCC is not applied to event logos based upon what the Pac-12, Stat Broadcast, or any tournament organizer/sponsor wants anymore then any of the article content of event articles is added or removed simply based upon what the subject of the article wants. The article is for reflecting what is written about the tournament, etc. in reliable sources, not for promoting the tournament or its imaging: in other words, it's not owned by either organization. If they wish the logo to be used in a manner not subject to NFCC, then maybe they should consider agreeing to release a freely-licensed version for upload to Wikimedia Commons. A non-free version of the logo may be used as long as the usage complies with NFCC, which I do not feel is the case for the list article. I am not saying that the file should be deleted; I am only saying it should be removed from the article where its usage doesn't comply with NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Buster Keaton Rides Again.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn but will post a newer nomination on this one and the screenshot soon. (non-admin closure) George Ho (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was created as attempt to replace the opening title screenshot. The file itself was previously the DVD cover but then replaced by the more recent poster. Looking at the poster, it is not a mere photo scan of the authentic poster. It appears computer-generated. Therefore, the screenshot should be the infobox image, neither the poster nor the DVD cover. George Ho (talk) 02:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, this is the poster and was downloaded from an internet site, not made-up, George's screenshot of the title page has been superseded but there appears to be some Wp:own issues involved. Check the lengthy edit history of a non-issue. Really, a Wp:lame argument here. Sheeesh. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The poster was made decades after the short film's release. How can it supersede the title screenshot, made in 1960s? Also, I tried finding the poster from 1960s but could not find it. --George Ho (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the hierarchy of image use for a film article article's infobox, it is 1) film poster 2} DVD/Video cover and 3) screenshot image of a title frame. The wikifilm group's MOS dealing with the use of an image in the infobox:

"Ideally, an image of the film's original theatrical release poster should be uploaded and added to the infobox to serve as an identifying image for the article. Poster images can be found at websites such as Internet Movie Poster Awards or Internet Movie Poster Database. If a poster image cannot be found for the film, or if the film did not have a theatrical release, then a cover image of the film's display case (VHS, DVD, etc.) may be used instead."

Please note the following proviso: "In the absence of an appropriate poster or cover image, a screenshot of the film's title card may also be used." What don't you get? A title frame can only be used if there is no film poster or other image from a media source. As a courtesy to you, I re-inserted the title frame, but it is a lousy image to begin with and only qualifies as a non-free image if there is a legitimate rationale provided, which I had done. Originally, I had written the entire film article on this particular documentary on a sandbox file, and found the same title frame but also located a film poster, so I discarded the first image. When I was about to put the article into the main space, I discovered another article on the same topic was already there. I then edited that article with new information and reference sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 08:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be some confusion as to the source of the poster; it is found on this website. The National Film Board of Canada (NFB) may also have a copy of the original film poster, although in the case of The Railrodder and its accompanying "behind-the-scenes" documentary, it may not have had a traditional theatrical release, but still may have been premiered at film festivals or broadcast on television. The warehouse fire in 1969 resulted in the destruction of approximately 70% of the NFB items in storage, so my initial enquiries about obtaining a copy of the film poster were not successful. Buster Keaton Rides Again and The Railrodder were circulated in a number of different versions including 16 mm film, Lsser Videodisc, VHS and DVD formats, as a combined set or issued individually. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a 1960s poster. Even the website doesn't have it. The poster from the source, by looking at it, is probably recently made and digital-generated. --George Ho (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It does not have to be a 1960s-era poster; any poster or DVD cover if they exist can be used to illustrate a film subject. Have you not read the proceeding information as to the standard required for an infobox image? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about what the guideline says, "original theatrical release poster"? George Ho (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read on: if the film did not have a theatrical release, then a cover image of the film's display case (VHS, DVD, etc.) may be used instead." FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are possible proofs of theatrical release: college showing in 1974, "Half Day" (1965), TV showing in 1969, showing from 1989 (French)—"Complexe Desjardins IV". --George Ho (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again: If a poster image cannot be found for the film, or if the film did not have a theatrical release, then a cover image of the film's display case (VHS, DVD, etc.) may be used instead." FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about Laserdisc? It was earlier than VHS and DVD releases. --George Ho (talk) 08:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saw it, but not really sure that the LaserDisc cover was suitable, as again, it was a dual set, the same reason that the first poster issued by the NFB was replaced by a "dedicated" film poster. There is no evidence that the poster in question is not appropriate as it is the illustration that is found on a number of websites, just as the MOS directs: "Poster images can be found at websites such as Internet Movie Poster Awards or Internet Movie Poster Database". The NFB image in their catalogue is also unsuitable. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This morning, I received an email from Albert Ohayon, the resident collections expert at the National Film Board of Canada who confirms there was never any film poster created for Buster Keaton Rides Again. He also confirms that the poster is a DVD cover. What more is needed to end this action? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I like to use an earlier image than a DVD one. A historical value is the most important of an image. If a DVD image is replaceable by earlier image, perhaps either a screenshot, Laserdisc image, or VHS image. George Ho (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you not noticed that the original screenshot is still being used? In the infobox, there is a standard that is in place for the use of images. The image is the one that the NFB identified as DVD cover art of the film, and the only other images used by the NFB are unsuitable at this point. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then which image shall be used as infobox image, the screenshot or the DVD cover (or poster)? I can't swap it now yet. George Ho (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting the film group MOS (again): If a poster image cannot be found for the film, or if the film did not have a theatrical release, then a cover image of the film's display case (VHS, DVD, etc.) may be used instead." This can't be more clear, the cover art is not only suitable but is already in place. The screenshot is still being used, just not in the infobox. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your view contrasts with mine. I guess we'll wait for third opinion then. George Ho (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, this is not my opinion, viewpoint or idea, this is the Wiki Film Group's MOS directive. Have you not read this? If a poster image cannot be found for the film, or if the film did not have a theatrical release, then a cover image of the film's display case (VHS, DVD, etc.) may be used instead." The NFB confirms that no theatrical poster exists and that they use the DVD image already identified in the article. There is no rationale for a screenshot to replace cover art in an infobox if there is already a suitable image. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop re-quoting the rule? Why not just paraphrase it or something? It says that, if there is no appropriate poster or cover, a screenshot might be used instead. I don't know why the DVD cover is deemed an appropriate infobox image in the first place other than to make up for absence of a poster. DVD covers might be appropriate for TV seasons or old pornos (...no need to explain further about them). For reasons against DVD cover as an infobox image, as you said, it is the package of the short film and the documentary. Also, it is more recent/current than older shots or covers. Also, historical value of the image does not hold up. If you find my reasons invalid, I see no other reason to discuss this with you then. George Ho (talk) 00:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before, the rule for infobox images in a Wiki film article is clear and unambiguous, if no original poster exists, use DVD or VHS cover art. It does not say a screenshot might be used instead. Your reasoning that the DVD cover art is not appropriate even though that is what the NFB uses, and is found on countless websites to illustrate the film in question, is completely baffling to me. Just saying that you think a screenshot is more important is fine, I incorporated it as a part of the content. It's not a particularly good image compared to the artwork that illustrates the article. If you have a problem with the Wiki Film Group's Manual of Style which specifies the use of images in a film article infobox, take it up with the group. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film/doc is not even a guideline. They are just instructions for the template, and you've used the same ol' quotes that isn't a "guideline" in the first place. WP:FILMNFI, a shortcut to the section of the real MOS guideline, discusses how to be careful with non-free images. Neither that nor WP:IUP is adequate about this dispute, unfortunately. --George Ho (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't think there's a knock-down policy-based (or guideline-based) reason to favour either the title card or the more recent poster. There's an editorial decision to be made about which would be more appropriate, but there is a good policy-based reason to say that we can't use both of them. I'm not sure FFD is the right place for making the decision as to which is used. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:10, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John, if a rule is not enough to pick which image is appropriate, can you prefer which is good as the infobox image per WP:consensus? George Ho (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@George: I'd personally lean towards the use of the DVD rather than the title card in this case, as in most cases. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:FILMNFI. these three tenets for using a non-free image must be met: (1) No free equivalent (no theatrical poster exists) (2) Minimal usage and minimal extent of use (only use in the infobox) (3) Significance (NFB identifies the DVD image as appropriate and is composed of an illustration from the film drawn in a 1960s "psychedelic" style with title of the film; this "head-and-shoulders" front view illustration showing the trademark outfit of rumpled clothes and porkpie hat, recreates a key comic scene in the film where Buster Keaton retrieves a tea service from a storage box, one that seemingly holds everything required on a long transcontinental trek; the same illustration is used on an earlier poster as well as being the basis of the cover art used in The Railrodder). As per discussion, I would not be in favour of using the screenshot as the infobox image, it is simply a poor representation of the film, showing only the lead character's back. Buster Keaton was an iconic film comic, and you just don't get that from the screenshot, the primary reason for replacing the image with a more appropriate one. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Latrice Butts.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned photograph previously published on various social media websites. Lacks educational value. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lkkjkjkjkhkh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned photograph. Personal snapshot with no educational value. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gridstream™ Solution.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image. Advertising/self-promotional. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

US Hockey logos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξ ^xplicit 02:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logos being used in USA Hockey National Team Development Program and United States men's national ice hockey team . Each file has an non-free use rationale, but the files are essentially the same with the only difference being their respective names. I don't see why both of these are needed per WP:NFCC#3a when one is more than sufficient to serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Each of the articles appears to be sub-entity of USA Hockey which is using File:USA Hockey.svg, whose was discussed at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 67#File:USA Hockey.svg. If the difference between the "USA Hockey" logo and the other two is so minor that the three files are considered to be the same, then once again there's no need three separate files and the usage in the two child entity articles does not seem to satisfy No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. The files should be deleted since the "USA Hockey" logo seems to be the one currently used. The National Team Development Program has its own logo which could be used instead for its article. If, however, the development program/national team logo is considered to be too simple for copyright protection, then WP:NFCC no longer applies , but still there does not seem to be a need for two files. The better of the two should be converted to {{PD-logo}}, and tagged with {{trademark}} and {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} if necessary while the other should be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jetuka Pator Dore Album Art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Borolar Ghor Album Art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raaz1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghulam CD Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muththirai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luck By Chance Album Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keeponly on Luck by Chance (soundtrack) ★ Bigr Tex 18:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in Luck by Chance (soundtrack), Remove from Luck by Chance. The image passes MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC for the notable and sourced soundtrack album at the same time failing the same guidelines for the film. The soundtrack infobox, track listing and reception sections should be removed from the film article for being unnecessary and a Main article template should be at the beginning of the soundtrack section linking to the soundtrack article. Aspects (talk) 03:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RDB soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep only for Rang De Basanti (soundtrack) ★ Bigr Tex 18:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in Rang De Basanti (soundtrack), Remove from Rang De Basanti. The image passes MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC for the notable and sourced soundtrack album at the same time failing the same guidelines for the film. The soundtrack infobox should be removed from the film article for being unnecessary. Aspects (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lagaan Soundtrack.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'Keep only for Lagaan (soundtrack) ★ Bigr Tex 18:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in Lagaan (soundtrack), Remove from Lagaan. The image passes MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC for the notable and sourced soundtrack album at the same time failing the same guidelines for the film. Almost all of the soundtrack information should be removed from the film article for duplicating what is already in the soundtrack article and a Main article template should be at the beginning of the soundtrack section linking to the soundtrack article. Aspects (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Album rangeela cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DilHaiKiMantaNahinAlbumCover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paheli-Film-CDCover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samar CD cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moondru Per Moondru Kaadhal audio CD cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Junoon soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lakshya soundtrack cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shadows of Time soundtrack cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Divine Intervention CD Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kadhal 2 Kalyanam (soundtrack album).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr No Keyia audio cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASK audio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deceased Organ Donation in India - 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly split copy of File:Indianmap007.jpg (using reupload instead of delete, undelete, move without redirect, undelete). Delete this copy and split File:Indianmap007.jpg correctly instead. Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aplusd michael goodmanSM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is from mgoodphoto.com - the official website for the photographer (http://www.mgoodphoto.com/contact.html). The website is copyrighted, and I don't see notification that this is licensed with cc-sa. Deadstar (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arabinamericashort.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description reads: "Ivan Shammas as Osama Ahmed Abou-Bakr in "Arab in America"". Does that mean that this is a screenshot? If so, unlikely that uploader can release this with GDFL. Deadstar (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kit body whiteroundcollar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An almost identical file exists under this name at commons:File:Kit body whiteroundcollar.png. Unless the difference is important the local file can probably be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All that money can buy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. The poster is not critically discussed where it is placed. Steel1943 (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.