Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Jane Howlett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, passes WP:Prof#C3--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Jane Howlett[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACADEMIC EvergreenFir (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: straightforward A7 for me Dschslava^Δxparlez moi 05:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom.--Savonneux (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Having been elected a fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 2014,[1] meets WP:PROF criterion #3. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:Prof#C3. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Comment Author has commented in good faith on the teahouse regarding preserving the article. If the decision is to delete, please consider moving to their sandbox and contacting them to explain. TimothyJosephWood 12:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT3. Membership of the AAS clearly fulfills WP:PROF#C3. The very first reference in the article said as much, so a little bit more diligence by the nominator and the delete !voters might have been in order, to avoid biting the new editor of this article. Joe Roe (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Their election to the Australian Academy of Science satisfies WP:PROF C3 as stated above. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As meeting WP:PROF - this nomination was one of several for Australian academics, as explained here - Arjayay (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.