Jump to content

Talk:Ben & Jerry's

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZScarpia (talk | contribs) at 09:54, 4 September 2023 (→‎Israel and Palestinian Territories/West Bank exit: -- comment.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Indian Lands

Surprise, surprise, a leading "Indian" spokesperson has taken up the idea and says he'd like to have his band of "Indians" land back, the HQ of Ben & Jerry's was erected on--2001:9E8:565B:6800:B87B:B2D0:FC51:5C60 (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That information has been synthesized by a fellow editor in the article. I think the community would be more than happy to add more information if a follow-up is issued by the company (spoiler alert: they won't issue a response to the request for giving the land back) EytanMelech (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Israel and Palestinian Territories/West Bank exit

The sub-sections "Sales in Israel and Palestinian Territories" and "Exit from West Bank" overlap some extent. Maybe ZScarpia, Burrobert, Iskandar323 and Jbbdude they should be merged. Before noticing the overlapping I updated the sentence now starting "In 2019" in the "Sale of company ..." sub-section which now also relates to the subject.

Perhaps also the releasing of the statement, apparently by B&J but actually by Unilever, [1] should be mentioned. Mcljlm (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Speaking for myself, I'd say that you should go ahead and make the changes you think would be beneficial.
Regarding statements issued by Unilever, if you think clarification is needed that they were issued by Unilever rather than the independent B+J board, go ahead. It is noted in at least one place that the B+J board reacted to one of the statements.
I made the following change to text about anti-BDS laws and policies in US states, which was an attempt to simplify the content, to remove what looked like slight editorialising and to clarify that the laws and policies are 'anti-BDS' rather than 'anti-Boycott' (as per the cited source): [1]
    ←   ZScarpia   09:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


References