User talk:Timothyjmartin

Welcome!

Hello, Timothyjmartin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Timothyjmartin/sandbox/Le Naturaliste, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Box of wolves (feed) 06:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Timothyjmartin/sandbox/Le Naturaliste

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Timothyjmartin/sandbox/Le Naturaliste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.timothymartin.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/LE-NATURALISTE-Artaujourdhui-cmp.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Box of wolves (feed) 06:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note

If you are Mr. Martin, you may want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on donating copyrighted materials and editing articles about yourself before continuing. Thank you.

Box of wolves (feed) 06:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I see that you have donated multiple images to Commons under a licence that permits anyone to distribute, copy and modify them for any purpose, including commercial, so thank you for that Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78689

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Timothyjmartin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team, Thank You for your prompt response. I am writing regarding my recent account block. The reason for my blocking was "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: just self-promo.". Now I have read the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically in the aspect of self-promotion. I have completely rephrased my content and removed those were indicating self promotion I sincerely apologize and will never repeat that mistake. I request you to please unblock my account so I can contribute an accurate, well-researched, and impartial content Thank You for considering my response.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Wikipedia Team, Thank You for your prompt response. I am writing regarding my recent account block. The reason for my blocking was "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: just self-promo.". Now I have read the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically in the aspect of self-promotion. I have completely rephrased my content and removed those were indicating self promotion  I sincerely apologize and will never repeat that mistake. I request you to please unblock my account so I can contribute an accurate, well-researched, and impartial content Thank You for considering my response. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia Team, Thank You for your prompt response. I am writing regarding my recent account block. The reason for my blocking was "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: just self-promo.". Now I have read the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically in the aspect of self-promotion. I have completely rephrased my content and removed those were indicating self promotion  I sincerely apologize and will never repeat that mistake. I request you to please unblock my account so I can contribute an accurate, well-researched, and impartial content Thank You for considering my response. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia Team, Thank You for your prompt response. I am writing regarding my recent account block. The reason for my blocking was "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: just self-promo.". Now I have read the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically in the aspect of self-promotion. I have completely rephrased my content and removed those were indicating self promotion  I sincerely apologize and will never repeat that mistake. I request you to please unblock my account so I can contribute an accurate, well-researched, and impartial content Thank You for considering my response. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Timothyjmartin (talk) 10:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timothyjmartin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I appreciate your attention to my previous appeal, and I understand the gravity of the issue that led to my account being blocked. The reason cited for the block was "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: just self-promo."

Upon careful reflection and a deeper understanding of Wikipedia's policies, I now recognize the error in my approach. I understand that Wikipedia is a platform dedicated to building a comprehensive and unbiased encyclopedia, and that contributions should be made with the primary goal of providing valuable information to the public, rather than for self-promotion or personal gain.

I am writing to emphasize my commitment to adhering to Wikipedia's principles and guidelines moving forward. I fully acknowledge that my previous actions were not in line with these principles, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused. I have learned the importance of putting the needs of the Wikipedia community and the integrity of the encyclopedia above personal interests.

In the future, I pledge to contribute in a manner that upholds Wikipedia's values and aligns with the encyclopedia's mission. My focus will be on providing accurate, well-researched, and impartial content that benefits the wider readership. I will refrain from any actions that could be perceived as self-promotion and ensure that my edits contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding on Wikipedia.

I kindly request your reconsideration of my appeal. I am eager to make amends and contribute positively to Wikipedia's collective efforts in building a reliable and comprehensive encyclopedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response. Timothyjmartin (talk) 04:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am summarily declining this request because it was clearly written by an AI. This wouldn't work to get the AI unblocked anyway- but since it is you who is blocked, not an AI, we want to hear from you. Please write a request in your own words. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.